The Efficacy of Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Prostheses for Cranioplasty: Evaluation of Postmarketing Data on 2697 Patients
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Cranioplasty is a surgical intervention aimed at reestablishing the integrity of skull defects. Autologous bone is still considered the treatment of choice for cranioplasty. The aims of this study were to characterize and evaluate the efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite (HA) to fill skull defects based on its biomimetic characteristics. Methods The authors analyzed the postmarketing data of all patients treated with custom-made porous HA prostheses (CustomBone Service). Characterization data in terms of physicochemical analysis and mechanical performance of the porous HA prostheses were also reported. Results The low incidence of adverse events (5.72%) due to the use of HA porous custom-made prostheses for cranioplasty is related to the biomimetic performance of the prostheses. The composition and morphology of the porosity enable it to be a useful biomimetic prosthesis for the reconstruction of large and complex skull defects, also able to promote osteointegration. Conclusions These collected and analyzed data demonstrate that porous HA is a suitable material to produce custom-made prostheses to repair craniolacunia. It is a biomimetic implant well-tolerated in both adult and pediatric patients and has been shown to be an effective and good alternative for cranial reconstruction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances · Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia - Italy
Department of Neurosurgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine - Italy
Fin-Ceramica Faenza S.p.A., Faenza, Ravenna - Italy
ISTEC – CNR, Faenza, Ravenna - Italy
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00701-002-0996-410.1007/s00701-002-0996-4 ↗
2. Koç N · Joint Dis Rel Surg · 1999 · 10 · 104
3. 10.3844/ajbbsp.2006.49.5610.3844/ajbbsp.2006.49.56 ↗
4. Thamaraiselvi TV · Trends Biomater Artifs Organs · 2007 · 18 · 9
5. 10.1097/00007632-199410150-0001710.1097/00007632-199410150-00017 ↗
6. Heise U · Int Orthop · 1990 · 14 · 32910.1007/BF00178768 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00621-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00621-5 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.82024030910.1002/jbm.820240309 ↗
9. 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.54110.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.541 ↗
10. ASTM C 1341-00. Flexural properties of continuous fiber-reinforced advances ceramic composites. W. Conshohocken, PA: American Society for testing and materials, 2000 (First Issued in 1996).
11. Zanotti B · Rev Med (Mex) · 2005 · 11 · 153
12. JuvinalRC MarshekKM Shell structure - Reports of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Pisa. Retrieved from http://www.dimnp.unipi.it/santus/MaterialeDidattica/ECM/DispenseECM_CilindriAnelliPiastreGusci.pdf.
13. Nataloni A · Rivista Medica · 2005 · 11 · 135
14. 10.4103/2152-7806.10629010.4103/2152-7806.106290 ↗
15. 10.1080/026886902100003095110.1080/0268869021000030951 ↗
16. 10.1097/00001665-200303000-0000310.1097/00001665-200303000-00003 ↗
17. Grant GA · J Neurosurg · 2004 · 100 · 163
18. 10.1007/s00381-004-1068-210.1007/s00381-004-1068-2 ↗
19. 10.1097/01.prs.0000187152.48402.1710.1097/01.prs.0000187152.48402.17 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.00110.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.001 ↗
21. 10.3171/2009.3.FOCUS09110.3171/2009.3.FOCUS091 ↗
22. 10.1097/00006534-199808000-0000210.1097/00006534-199808000-00002 ↗
23. Liu JK · Neurosurg Focus · 2004 · 16 · ECP1
24. Evans FG · Journal of Biomechanics. · 1969 · 2 · 3710.1016/0021-9290(69)90042-6 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00701-011-1014-510.1007/s00701-011-1014-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.neuchi.2011.09.00610.1016/j.neuchi.2011.09.006 ↗