journal article·2026-04Open access

Molecular modulation of cell migration via chitosan-based hydrogels: Toward smart biomaterial for wound regeneration

Atefe Hosseinkhani, Reyhaneh Molaei, Ali Roosta, Nazanin Mansouri Ghader Abad, Mostafa Saberian

Abstract

Chitosan-derived hydrogels offer a highly tunable scaffold for orchestrating the multifaceted process of wound repair, yet their full potential hinges on an integrated understanding of biochemical and biophysical cues. Here, we provide a concise yet comprehensive analysis of design parameters that govern cell-matrix interactions, focusing on polymer backbone modification, crosslinking density, and incorporation of bioactive ligands. We demonstrate how precise control of viscoelastic properties viscoelastic properties, including stiffness and stress relaxation, achieved through reversible covalent bonds and supramolecular assemblies regulates YAP/TAZ nuclear localization and downstream PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling to differentially promote coordinated keratinocyte migration, fibroblast proliferation, and endothelial angiogenesis. Functionalization with RGD peptides and heparin-binding motifs further amplifies receptor-mediated adhesion and growth factor sequestration, creating a pro-regenerative microenvironment. We critically appraise the kinetic profiles of growth factor release and immunomodulatory payloads, underscoring the necessity of spatiotemporal precision in smart hydrogel systems and summarize preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrating accelerated wound closure in diabetic and burn models. Finally, we identify pivotal challenges including the quantitative decoupling of mechanical versus molecular influences in vivo, long-term biocompatibility of modified chitosan derivatives, and translation of high-throughput screening data into clinical contexts and propose a roadmap leveraging single-cell transcriptomics and advanced imaging, and AI-driven modeling to overcome translational challenges. This synthesis delivers actionable guidelines for the development of next-generation, personalized wound therapies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/19336918.2022.205552010.1080/19336918.2022.2055520 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.5139810.1002/app.51398 ↗
3. 10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.810.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.8 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00018-019-03107-310.1007/s00018-019-03107-3 ↗
5. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.65059810.3389/fbioe.2021.650598 ↗
6. Molaei R, Hosseinkhani A, Saberian M. Molecular regulation of tissue remodeling through chitosan-based hydrogels in wound healing dynamics. JTEPBR 2025; 9(19): 1361–1375.
7. 10.3390/polym1603034410.3390/polym16030344 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3204010.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32040 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym1619281810.3390/polym16192818 ↗
10. Ma X, Sekhar KPC, Zhang P, et al. Advances in stimuli-responsive injectable hydrogels for biomedical applications. JBS 2024; 12(21): 5468–5480.
11. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13417210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134172 ↗
12. 10.37349/ebmx.2025.10133610.37349/ebmx.2025.101336 ↗
13. 10.3390/ijms2212648610.3390/ijms22126486 ↗
14. 10.1055/s-0041-173179110.1055/s-0041-1731791 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsabm.3c0122710.1021/acsabm.3c01227 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6633/ad36d210.1088/1361-6633/ad36d2 ↗
17. Haugh JM, Chen J, Holt JR, et al. PIEZO1 regulates leader cell formation and cellular coordination during collective keratinocyte migration. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20(4): e1011855.
18. 10.1159/00052827110.1159/000528271 ↗
19. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.71278110.3389/fimmu.2021.712781 ↗
20. 10.1039/D4RA04258A10.1039/D4RA04258A ↗
21. 10.1186/s12951-023-02174-w10.1186/s12951-023-02174-w ↗
22. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.102841010.3389/fimmu.2022.1028410 ↗
23. 10.1002/dvdy.2424110.1002/dvdy.24241 ↗
24. 10.3390/cimb4410033710.3390/cimb44100337 ↗
25. 10.3390/molecules2311281910.3390/molecules23112819 ↗
26. 10.1111/1753-0407.1337210.1111/1753-0407.13372 ↗
27. 10.3389/fphar.2022.82862710.3389/fphar.2022.828627 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41392-023-01501-910.1038/s41392-023-01501-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3426910.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34269 ↗
30. 10.3390/cells1009233810.3390/cells10092338 ↗
31. 10.1002/jev2.1233210.1002/jev2.12332 ↗
32. 10.3390/ijms2216899210.3390/ijms22168992 ↗
33. 10.3389/fendo.2021.74486810.3389/fendo.2021.744868 ↗
34. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.121632110.3389/fimmu.2023.1216321 ↗
35. Melincovici CS, Bosca AB, Susman S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2018; 59(2): 455–467.
36. 10.1098/rsob.20022310.1098/rsob.200223 ↗
37. 10.3390/ijms2501005010.3390/ijms25010050 ↗
38. 10.1186/s12951-022-01390-010.1186/s12951-022-01390-0 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01036.x10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01036.x ↗
40. 10.1172/JCI9355510.1172/JCI93555 ↗
41. 10.3390/ijms2504217210.3390/ijms25042172 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41374-018-0025-810.1038/s41374-018-0025-8 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41388-022-02329-310.1038/s41388-022-02329-3 ↗
44. 10.1038/sj.cr.729025710.1038/sj.cr.7290257 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41392-021-00762-610.1038/s41392-021-00762-6 ↗
46. 10.1101/cshperspect.a04123610.1101/cshperspect.a041236 ↗
47. 10.3389/fendo.2024.140046210.3389/fendo.2024.1400462 ↗
48. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.139547910.3389/fimmu.2024.1395479 ↗
49. 10.1038/s42003-021-02298-510.1038/s42003-021-02298-5 ↗
50. 10.3389/fphys.2022.81475410.3389/fphys.2022.814754 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41598-024-84398-w10.1038/s41598-024-84398-w ↗
52. 10.3390/ph1304006010.3390/ph13040060 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0375310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03753 ↗
54. 10.1007/s42242-022-00194-310.1007/s42242-022-00194-3 ↗
55. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.035010.1089/ten.tea.2020.0350 ↗
56. 10.33263/LIANBS134.16810.33263/LIANBS134.168 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.3c0210810.1021/acsami.3c02108 ↗
58. 10.1039/C7RA13510F10.1039/C7RA13510F ↗
59. Rajinikanth B S, Rajkumar DSR, Keerthika K, et al. Chitosan-based biomaterial in wound healing: a review. Cureus 2024; 16(2): e55193.
60. 10.3390/ma1311266310.3390/ma13112663 ↗
61. 10.3390/polym1610135110.3390/polym16101351 ↗
62. 10.3390/gels1003017510.3390/gels10030175 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.033 ↗
64. 10.3390/molecules2623713610.3390/molecules26237136 ↗
65. Mochizuki M, Yamagata N, Philp D, et al. Integrin-dependent cell behavior on ECM peptide-conjugated chitosan membranes. Pept Sci Orig Res Biomol 2007; 88(2): 122–130.
66. Li YY, Ji SF, Fu XB, et al. Biomaterial-based mechanical regulation facilitates scarless wound healing with functional skin appendage regeneration. Mil Med Res 2024; 11(1): 13.
67. 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-210.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
68. 10.1038/nrm.2017.8710.1038/nrm.2017.87 ↗
69. 10.3389/fcell.2022.90102610.3389/fcell.2022.901026 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41598-024-67646-x10.1038/s41598-024-67646-x ↗
71. 10.1038/s41586-020-2555-710.1038/s41586-020-2555-7 ↗
72. 10.1002/stem.248910.1002/stem.2489 ↗
73. 10.1126/science.aba237410.1126/science.aba2374 ↗
74. 10.1073/pnas.170403011410.1073/pnas.1704030114 ↗
75. 10.1038/s41467-021-25921-910.1038/s41467-021-25921-9 ↗
76. 10.3390/bioengineering1102016810.3390/bioengineering11020168 ↗
77. Wang X, Zhu Y, Sun C, et al. Feedback activation of basic fibroblast growth factor signaling via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in skin fibroblasts. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8: 32.
78. 10.1016/j.reth.2024.10.00310.1016/j.reth.2024.10.003 ↗
79. 10.1186/s11671-023-03903-810.1186/s11671-023-03903-8 ↗
80. Shang S, Zhuang K, Chen J, et al. A bioactive composite hydrogel dressing that promotes healing of both acute and chronic diabetic skin wounds. Bioact Mater 2024; 34: 298–310.
81. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1504129710.3390/pharmaceutics15041297 ↗
82. 10.3390/polym1423516310.3390/polym14235163 ↗
83. 10.3390/ijms2211591610.3390/ijms22115916 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.00210.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.04910.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.049 ↗
86. 10.3390/jfb1602004510.3390/jfb16020045 ↗
87. 10.1039/D4RA08406C10.1039/D4RA08406C ↗
88. 10.3109/02713683.2016.114523510.3109/02713683.2016.1145235 ↗
89. 10.1080/21655979.2021.201762510.1080/21655979.2021.2017625 ↗
90. 10.1002/jbm.a.3725010.1002/jbm.a.37250 ↗
91. 10.3390/gels1005029510.3390/gels10050295 ↗
92. 10.3390/molecules2616473510.3390/molecules26164735 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.02.00410.1016/j.jiec.2022.02.004 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.12932310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129323 ↗
95. 10.1039/D4RA01594K10.1039/D4RA01594K ↗
96. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.104393910.3389/fbioe.2022.1043939 ↗
97. 10.1038/s41392-024-01852-x10.1038/s41392-024-01852-x ↗
98. 10.1038/s41598-019-42848-w10.1038/s41598-019-42848-w ↗
99. 10.1021/acsami.8b1559110.1021/acsami.8b15591 ↗
100. Lončarević A, Ivanković M, Rogina A. Lysozyme-induced degradation of chitosan: the characterisation of degraded chitosan scaffolds. J Tissue Repair Regen 2017; 1(1): 12–22.