Effect of 1-Piece Post and Core Fabrication Techniques on Fracture Strength
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture strengths of post and core systems produced with different fabrication techniques and materials. Methods Forty extracted human single-root premolars were used in this study. After root canal treatment, the teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups of 10 each as follows: group C: metallic 1-piece posts and cores fabricated by casting, and serving as the control; group CM: metallic posts and cores fabricated with the copy milled technique; group LS: 1-piece posts and cores fabricated with the laser sintering technique; and group ZR: 1-piece zirconia posts and cores fabricated with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). The posts and cores were cemented to the teeth with adhesive resin cement; then, the specimens were mounted to acrylic resin blocks, attached to an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and loaded with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, until fracture. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results The highest fracture results were found in group ZR (315.4 ± 53.4 N), which showed significant differences from all other groups (p<0.05). The lowest test values were found in group C (230.2 ± 29.8 N). Group LS (250.9 ± 29.0 N), group CM (253.0 ± 22.4 N) and group C did not show any significant differences (p>0.05). Conclusions Custom-made zirconia 1-piece posts and cores, fabricated using the CAD-CAM procedure, can be an alternative treatment method when compared with other techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun - Turkey
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun - Turkey
Private Practice, Samsun - Turkey
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0011-8532(01)00006-410.1016/S0011-8532(01)00006-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90008-810.1016/0021-9290(83)90008-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90099-110.1016/0022-3913(89)90099-1 ↗
4. 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.9010.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90 ↗
5. Isidor F · Int J Prosthodont · 1999 · 12 · 78
6. Galen WW · 2002 · 765
7. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-410.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70220-910.1016/S0022-3913(99)70220-9 ↗
9. Koutayas SO · Quintessence Int · 1999 · 30 · 383
10. Edelhoff D · Oper Dent · 2002 · 27 · 455
11. Friedel W · Quintessence Int · 2006 · 37 · 289
12. 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60151-610.1016/S0022-3913(07)60151-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60050-X10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60050-X ↗
14. Haag P · Quintessence Int · 2007 · 38 · e5
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.00110.1016/j.dental.2008.03.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.01510.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01672.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01672.x ↗
18. 10.1007/s13191-011-0051-310.1007/s13191-011-0051-3 ↗
19. Rosa R · Gen Dent · 2012 · 60 · e62
20. 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60080-710.1016/S0022-3913(10)60080-7 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01526.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01526.x ↗
22. Butz F · Int J Prosthodont · 2001 · 14 · 58
23. 10.4012/dmj.2009-12810.4012/dmj.2009-128 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00014-710.1016/S0109-5641(99)00014-7 ↗
25. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00720.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00720.x ↗
26. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12384910.1067/mpr.2002.123849 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60214-610.1016/S0022-3913(09)60214-6 ↗
28. 10.4012/dmj.2010-10110.4012/dmj.2010-101 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02028.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02028.x ↗
30. 10.2334/josnusd.48.1510.2334/josnusd.48.15 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60025-110.1016/S0022-3913(09)60025-1 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00784-012-0673-910.1007/s00784-012-0673-9 ↗