Microbial Analysis of Biofilms on Cement Surfaces: An Investigation in Cement-Associated Peri-Implantitis
Source abstract
Abstract
The cementation of implant-supported restorations always poses the risk of excess cement retained in the peri-implant sulcus despite careful clinical control. Excess cement can become the basis of colonization by oral microorganisms. As a result of the biofilm formation peri-mucositis or peri-implantitis may develop. Complications were observed in the routine prosthetic restoration of implants when a methacrylate-based cement was used. These developed a few weeks after cementation of the suprastructure and caused bleeding on probing as well as suppuration from the peri-implant tissue. In the revision therapy, excess cement in the peri-implant sulcus was found in many cases. This excess cement was sampled from ten patients and investigated for biofilm formation. For this purpose, the cement samples were collected and analyzed for bacterial in situ colonization by 16S rDNA-based methods. In laboratory experiments, the methacrylate-based cement and two other dental cements were then investigated for their proneness to form biofilm. The results of the in situ and in vitro investigations revealed a strong tendency towards bacterial invasion of the methacrylate-based cement by opportunistic species and pathogens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Karlsruhe - Germany
Institute of Functional Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe - Germany
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. CallanD.P., CobbC.M. Excess cement and peri-implant disease. Journal of Implants & Advanced Clinical Dentistry. 2009; 1: 61–68.
2. GapskiR., NeugeborenN., PomeranzA.Z., ReissnerM.W. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(5): 943–946.
3. PaulettoN., LahiffeB.J., WaltonJ.N. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14(6): 865–868.
4. 10.1902/jop.2009.09011510.1902/jop.2009.090115 ↗
5. 10.1067/mpr.2002.11941810.1067/mpr.2002.119418 ↗
6. SantosaR.E., MartinW., MortonD. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25(6): 1145–1152.
7. 10.1067/mpr.2003.6610.1067/mpr.2003.66 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60102-510.1016/S0022-3913(09)60102-5 ↗
9. ShapoffC.A., LaheyB.J. Crestal bone loss and the consequences of retained excess cement around dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012; 33(2): 94–96, 98-101; quiz 102, 112.
10. NissanJ., NarobaiD., GrossO., GhelfanO., ChaushuG. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(5): 1102–1107.
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.04810.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.048 ↗
12. 10.1177/002203451036864410.1177/0022034510368644 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.04.00210.1016/j.tripleo.2003.04.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/0300-5712(87)90003-010.1016/0300-5712(87)90003-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.001 ↗
16. KorschM., ObstU., WaltherW. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; [epub ahead of print].
17. 10.5301/ijao.500014410.5301/ijao.5000144 ↗
18. 10.1159/00001646110.1159/000016461 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.05610.1016/j.watres.2003.10.056 ↗
20. 10.2307/193240910.2307/1932409 ↗
21. 10.1093/nar/25.17.338910.1093/nar/25.17.3389 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.00110.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00107.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00107.x ↗
24. 10.1038/ismej.2010.3010.1038/ismej.2010.30 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00159.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00159.x ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00174.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00174.x ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01566.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01566.x ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01856.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01856.x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 ↗
30. 10.5301/JABFM.2012.927910.5301/JABFM.2012.9279 ↗
31. 10.5301/ijao.500005110.5301/ijao.5000051 ↗
32. 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.41310.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413 ↗
33. 10.5301/JABFM.2012.925510.5301/JABFM.2012.9255 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.01010.1016/j.jhin.2009.02.010 ↗