Monitoring the osseointegration process in porous Ti6Al4V implants produced by additive manufacturing: an experimental study in sheep
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the design and osseointegration process of transitive porous implants that can be used in humans and all trabecular and compact bone structure animals. The aim was to find a way of forming a strong and durable tissue bond on the bone–implant interface. Methods: Massive and transitive porous implants were produced on a direct metal laser sintering machine, surgically implanted into the skulls of sheep and kept in place for 12 weeks. At the end of the 12-week period, the Massive and porous implants removed from the sheep were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to monitor the osseointegration process. Results: In the literature, each study has selected standard sizes for pore diameter in the structures they use. However, none of these involved transitional porous structures. In this study, as opposed to standard pores, there were spherical or elliptical pores at the micro level, development channels and an inner region. Bone cells developed in the inner region. Transitive pores grown gradually in accordance with the natural structure of the bone were modeled in the inner region for cells to develop. Due to this structure, a strong and durable tissue bond could be formed at the bone–implant interface. Conclusions: Osseointegration processes of Massive vs. porous implants were compared. It was observed that cells were concentrated on the surface of Massive implants. Therefore, osseointegration between implant and bone was less than that of porous implants. In transitive porous implants, as opposed to Massive implants, an outer region was formed in the bone–implant interface that allowed tissue development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta - Turkey
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta - Turkey
Department of Brain and Nerve Surgery, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta - Turkey
Senirkent Vocational School, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta - Turkey
Uluborlu Vocational School, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta - Turkey
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Gökçek EI. [The Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials for Ortopedical Implant and Prosthesis Design]. [Master’s Thesis in Turkish]. Zonguldak. 2006. http://webkutuphane.beun.edu.tr/. Accessed September 11, 2017.
2. 10.3844/ajeassp.2011.169.17410.3844/ajeassp.2011.169.174 ↗
3. Özuğur B. [The investigation of manufacturability of parts having complex structure by rapid prototyping technologies]. [Master’s Thesis in Turkish] Ankara. 2006. http://lib.gazi.edu.tr/.
4. Schmoelz W · 2012 · 17
5. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. [Biomaterials]. [Article in Turkish]. http://www.bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/system/files/biyomalzemeler.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2017.
6. Czernuszka J. · Materials World · 1996 · 4 · 452
7. Wang W · Ann Acad Med Singapore · 2011 · 40 · 23710.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V40N5p237 ↗
8. ASM International. Biomaterials in Orthopaedic Surgery. 2009.
9. 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70158-910.1016/S0030-5898(05)70158-9 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.82010030410.1002/jbm.820100304 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-642-56486-4_210.1007/978-3-642-56486-4_2 ↗
12. Özdemir M · Cumhuriyet Dent J · 2011 · 14 · 64
13. Büyükakyüz N · Istanbul Univ Dishekim Fak Derg · 2009 · 43 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.02.00710.1016/j.msec.2008.02.007 ↗
15. Poukens J · Dijital Dental News · 2010 · 30
16. 10.1007/s00170005010710.1007/s001700050107 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00170-007-1308-110.1007/s00170-007-1308-1 ↗
18. Custompart.net. Additive fabrication: rapid prototyping, tooling. http://www.custompartnet.com/wu/additive-fabrication. Accessed September 01, 2017.
19. Çelik İ · Journal of the Institute of Science & Technology of Dumlupinar University · 2013 · 53
20. Delikanlı K · Makine Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi · 2006 · 33
21. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.09.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2013.09.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.03710.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.037 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.intermet.2007.06.01310.1016/j.intermet.2007.06.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.00510.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.005 ↗
26. Electro Optical Systems. Material data sheet: EOS Titanium Ti64. Munich, Germany: EOS. http://gpiprototype.com/images/PDF/EOS_Titanium_Ti64_en.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2017.
27. Pasđnlđ A · Electron J Biotechnol · 2010 · 1 · 41
28. 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.08110.1016/j.arth.2003.12.081 ↗
29. 10.1299/jsmea.48.36910.1299/jsmea.48.369 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.08110.1016/j.arth.2003.12.081 ↗
32. Petrovic V · CRC Press · 2011 · 115
33. Xu-Bin S., et al. Development of porous medical implant scaffolds via laser additive manufacturing, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2012;22:181-187.10.1016/S1003-6326(12)61706-3 ↗
34. 10.1177/088532821143185710.1177/0885328211431857 ↗