Effect of Propolis as a Root Canal Irrigant on Bond Strength to Dentin
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of propolis on bond strength to dentin of a self-etch adhesive when used as a final irrigant. Methods 126 human third molars were sectioned 3 mm below the occlusal level and then randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 18). The exposed dentin surfaces were treated with irrigation solutions as follows: Group 1: 5.25% NaOCl; Group 2: 5.25% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA; Group 3: 5.25% NaOCl followed by Tubulicid Plus (Temrex, Freeport, NY, USA); Group 4: 5.25% NaOCl followed by MTAD; Group 5: 5.25% NaOCl followed by 20% propolis; Group 6: 5.25% NaOCl followed by 2% CHX; Group 7: distilled water (control). Irrigated specimens were bonded using Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) with Tygon (Saint-Gobain, Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, France), tubes for microshear bond strength testing. Data was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results Among the tested groups, although the lowest bond strength values were detected in Group 1 (11.25 ± 1.97), a significant statistical difference was detected only between this group and Group 4 (18.70 ± 1.82) and Group 5 (16.75 ± 3.70) (p = 0.0012). Conclusions 20% propolis solution as a final irrigant was found to have a favorable effect on the dentin bond strength of the tested self-etch adhesive to coronal dentin when compared with other irrigation solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Trauma and Treatments · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun - Turkey
Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun - Turkey
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak - Turkey
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x ↗
2. 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00546.x10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00546.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.00110.1016/j.joen.2006.07.001 ↗
4. 10.1097/00004770-200405000-0001310.1097/00004770-200405000-00013 ↗
5. Ausiello P · Am J Dent · 1997 · 10 · 237
6. 10.1097/00004770-200108000-0000710.1097/00004770-200108000-00007 ↗
7. 10.1097/00004770-200303000-0000210.1097/00004770-200303000-00002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.00310.1016/j.joen.2006.08.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.02410.1016/j.joen.2010.11.024 ↗
10. Zare Jahromi M · Iran Endod J · 2012 · 7 · 127
11. 10.1159/00026139010.1159/000261390 ↗
12. 10.2334/josnusd1959.32.410.2334/josnusd1959.32.4 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01191.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01191.x ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00667.x10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00667.x ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00966.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00966.x ↗
16. Fawzi EM · J Adhes Dent · 2010 · 12 · 63
17. 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.00210.1016/j.joen.2009.05.002 ↗
18. Salz U · J Adhes Dent · 2010 · 12 · 343
19. 10.1155/2012/61896010.1155/2012/618960 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.00110.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001 ↗
21. 10.1097/00004770-200402000-0001310.1097/00004770-200402000-00013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.00810.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.008 ↗
23. 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-104710.5005/jp-journals-10024-1047 ↗
24. 10.1002/tox.2078210.1002/tox.20782 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.01610.1016/j.joen.2008.11.016 ↗
26. 10.1097/00004770-200312000-0000810.1097/00004770-200312000-00008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.02110.1016/j.joen.2006.12.021 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01179.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01179.x ↗
29. 10.1177/15440591070860011510.1177/154405910708600115 ↗
30. Kahveci O · J Adhes Dent · 2011 · 13 · 31