Chitosan-coated titanium screws: Enhancing biofilm resistance, mechanical stability, and osseointegration in orthopedic implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Orthopedic implant-associated infections, primarily caused by biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus , pose significant clinical challenges. These infections often lead to implant failure, prolonged antibiotic treatments, and an increased risk of revision surgeries, emphasizing the need for effective biofilm-resistant implant materials. In this study, we present a dual-functional titanium screw (Ti-S) grafted with chitosan (Cs), a biocompatible polymer known for its osteogenic and antimicrobial properties while maintaining mechanical integrity. The chitosan-modified titanium screw (Cs-Ti-S) was prepared via chemical immobilization to enhance resistance to biofilm formation while promoting osseointegration and preserving biomechanical integrity. Biomechanical testing confirmed that chitosan modification did not compromise mechanical performance, as Cs-Ti-S exhibited a torsional yield strength of 1.70 ± 0.00 Nm compared to 1.76 ± 0.05 Nm for unmodified titanium screws (Un-Ti-S), and an axial pullout force of 68.66 ± 14.36 N for Cs-Ti-S versus 70.33 ± 9.71 N for Un-Ti-S. Micro-scratch tests revealed similar hardness values (1.26 ± 0.03 GPa for Cs-Ti-S vs. 1.40 ± 0.07 GPa for Un-Ti-S) and scratch resistance, ensuring surface durability. Gene expression analysis showed upregulated β1-integrin on Cs-Ti-S at 24 h post-infection, indicating improved osteoblast adhesion. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis confirmed significantly reduced bacterial biofilm formation on Cs-Ti-S. Moreover, the combination of povidone-iodide (PI) treatment on Cs-Ti-S surfaces significantly inhibited biofilm formation over 7 days, unlike Un-Ti-S, which retained significant adhesion. These results suggest chitosan grafting as a scalable, non-antibiotic strategy to enhance antimicrobial resistance and osseointegration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, USA
Department of Chemistry, The University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA
Funding
national science foundation · national institute of arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00005373-199603001-0002710.1097/00005373-199603001-00027 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.02410.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.024 ↗
3. 10.1177/10711007970180030310.1177/107110079701800303 ↗
4. 10.2106/00004623-199403000-0000110.2106/00004623-199403000-00001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jot.2024.09.01210.1016/j.jot.2024.09.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.00310.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0272710.1021/acsomega.3c02727 ↗
8. 10.1177/0954411922110854010.1177/09544119221108540 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jot.2018.06.00610.1016/j.jot.2018.06.006 ↗
10. 10.1302/0301-620X.60B2.35088210.1302/0301-620X.60B2.350882 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00264-010-0960-510.1007/s00264-010-0960-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1083-7515(01)00005-510.1016/S1083-7515(01)00005-5 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1509315010.3390/ma15093150 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10174510.1016/j.isci.2020.101745 ↗
15. 10.1080/14686996.2022.210615610.1080/14686996.2022.2106156 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma712816810.3390/ma7128168 ↗
17. 10.21037/jss.2017.05.0110.21037/jss.2017.05.01 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1510362210.3390/ma15103622 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-022-08770-810.1007/s00170-022-08770-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11285010.1016/j.matdes.2024.112850 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1701011410.3390/ma17010114 ↗
22. 10.3390/jfb1604014410.3390/jfb16040144 ↗
23. Shen X, Shukla P. A review of titanium based orthopaedic implants (part-I): physical characteristics, problems and the need for surface modification. Peen Sci Technol; 1: 301–332.
24. 10.1186/s13018-022-03492-910.1186/s13018-022-03492-9 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma509152810.3390/ma5091528 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0248410.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02484 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1623736110.3390/ma16237361 ↗
28. 10.1002/adem.20220033710.1002/adem.202200337 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.07110.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.071 ↗
30. Phase stability of titanium alloys: a first principles study https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292449889_Phase_stability_of_titanium_alloys_a_first_principles_study (accessed 17 May 2025).
31. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2806310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28063 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00776-005-0984-710.1007/s00776-005-0984-7 ↗
33. 10.1155/2011/83658710.1155/2011/836587 ↗
34. 10.3390/app1203154810.3390/app12031548 ↗
35. 10.1002/jor.2344510.1002/jor.23445 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.03310.1016/j.bone.2014.07.033 ↗
37. 10.1186/s13018-023-04054-310.1186/s13018-023-04054-3 ↗
38. 10.3390/diagnostics1312212310.3390/diagnostics13122123 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00380-510.1016/S0142-9612(01)00380-5 ↗
40. 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00934.x10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00934.x ↗
41. 10.1590/1516-1439.34681410.1590/1516-1439.346814 ↗
42. 10.1155/2023/872849910.1155/2023/8728499 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.11353410.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113534 ↗
44. 10.3390/microorganisms910215410.3390/microorganisms9102154 ↗
45. Cao Y, Su B, Chinnaraj S, et al. Nanostructured titanium surfaces exhibit recalcitrance towards Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1–13.
46. 10.1002/jbm.a.3527010.1002/jbm.a.35270 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.044 ↗
48. 10.1002/jor.2211410.1002/jor.22114 ↗
49. 10.2106/00004623-198870030-0000810.2106/00004623-198870030-00008 ↗
50. Fernandes A, Dias M. The microbiological profiles of infected prosthetic implants with an emphasis on the organisms which form biofilms. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 219–223.
51. 10.1056/NEJMra03541510.1056/NEJMra035415 ↗
52. 10.1007/s42770-021-00624-x10.1007/s42770-021-00624-x ↗
53. Rozis M, Evangelopoulos DS, Pneumaticos SG. Orthopedic implant-related biofilm pathophysiology: a review of the literature. Cureus 2021; 13: e15634.
54. Connaughton A, Childs A, Dylewski S, et al. Biofilm disrupting technology for orthopedic implants: what’s on the horizon? Front Med (Lausanne) 2014; 1: 86726.
55. 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.07.00310.1016/j.engreg.2020.07.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.00210.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.002 ↗
57. 10.2174/187432500161001063610.2174/1874325001610010636 ↗
58. 10.1186/s13756-019-0533-310.1186/s13756-019-0533-3 ↗
59. 10.1021/ACSAMI.4C21111/SUPPL_FILE/AM4C21111_SI_003.AVI10.1021/ACSAMI.4C21111/SUPPL_FILE/AM4C21111_SI_003.AVI ↗
60. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.92133810.3389/fbioe.2022.921338 ↗
61. 10.1186/s40824-022-00269-310.1186/s40824-022-00269-3 ↗
62. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.59831110.3389/fbioe.2020.598311 ↗
63. 10.1002/jbm.a.3412110.1002/jbm.a.34121 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.02010.1016/j.identj.2024.11.020 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.12510.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.125 ↗
66. Ghasemi F, Jahani A, Moradi A, et al. Different modification methods of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement for orthopedic surgery applications. Arch Bone Joint Surg 2023; 11: 485.
67. 10.3390/polym1210229910.3390/polym12102299 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.034 ↗
69. 10.1039/D2BM01589G10.1039/D2BM01589G ↗
70. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029 ↗
71. 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.8410.4047/jap.2013.5.2.84 ↗
72. 10.5037/jomr.2017.820110.5037/jomr.2017.8201 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.06710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.067 ↗
74. Raza FB, Vijayaragavalu S, Vaidyanathan AK. Bone morphogenetic protein as bone additive around dental implant and its impact on osseointegration: a systematic review. J Dent 2022; 23: 336.
75. 10.1038/S41598-022-23322-610.1038/S41598-022-23322-6 ↗
76. Ionic silver coating of orthopedic implants may impair osteogenic differentiation and mineralization https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/etm.2025.12801 (accessed 17 May 2025).
77. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0158310.1021/acsomega.0c01583 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.035 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.08.00710.1016/j.yrtph.2018.08.007 ↗
80. 10.3390/ijms2313710210.3390/ijms23137102 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11905910.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119059 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.14210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.142 ↗
83. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.89976010.3389/fbioe.2022.899760 ↗
84. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00788.x10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00788.x ↗
85. 10.3390/coatings1006053410.3390/coatings10060534 ↗
86. 10.1371/journal.pone.003936710.1371/journal.pone.0039367 ↗
87. Li B, Xia X, Guo M, et al. Biological and antibacterial properties of the micro-nanostructured hydroxyapatite/chitosan coating on titanium. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1–10.
88. 10.3390/polym1306090410.3390/polym13060904 ↗
89. 10.1038/s41598-021-94502-z10.1038/s41598-021-94502-z ↗
90. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.07.01410.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.07.014 ↗
91. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.78381610.3389/fbioe.2021.783816 ↗
92. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.90758910.3389/fbioe.2022.907589 ↗
93. 10.5051/jpis.190568028410.5051/jpis.1905680284 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.012 ↗
95. 10.1007/s10856-022-06651-w10.1007/s10856-022-06651-w ↗
96. 10.1038/s41598-022-09378-410.1038/s41598-022-09378-4 ↗
97. 10.1067/mod.2002.12487010.1067/mod.2002.124870 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21334210.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213342 ↗
99. 10.2106/00004623-199610000-0001010.2106/00004623-199610000-00010 ↗
100. 10.3390/biology1001001210.3390/biology10010012 ↗