journal article·2020-01Open access

Effect of doping different Si source on Ca-P bioceramic coating fabricated by laser cladding

Qi Fu, Qibin Liu, Long Li, Xingmao Li, Huaizhang Gu, Bo Sheng

Abstract

The doping of silicon (Si) has been proved to improve the bioactivity of Ca-P ceramics. In light of this thinking, in the present study, Ca-P coatings with La 2 O 3 by addition of 10 wt% SiO 2 and 10 wt% diatomaceous earth (DE) were fabricated by laser cladding on Ti6Al4V, respectively. Coating doped without Si was also fabricated as the comparison group for the experiment. The effect of two different Si sources on the surface morphology, microstructure, microhardness, and bioactivity was systematically studied. The experimental results show that the Si-doped coating is of rough surface morphology, and the addition of DE significantly reduces the number of cracks and improves the microhardness. The X-ray diffraction results reveal that the amount of bioactive phase tricalcium-phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) reaches maximum in the DE-doped coating. After soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF), the precipitate of bone-like apatite in the DE-doped coating is significantly higher than that of the other coatings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China · the high-level innovative talents plan of Guizhou Province

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10856-008-3658-010.1007/s10856-008-3658-0 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10856-010-4105-610.1007/s10856-010-4105-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.003 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.82007030410.1002/jbm.820070304 ↗
5. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj17710.1093/toxsci/kfj177 ↗
6. 10.1039/b600708b10.1039/b600708b ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.06710.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.067 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.7b1596710.1021/acsami.7b15967 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.041 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.027 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.01610.1016/j.msec.2006.05.016 ↗
12. 10.1023/A:101854972087310.1023/A:1018549720873 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00603-910.1016/S0257-8972(99)00603-9 ↗
14. Jiang J · J Chongqing Univ Technol · 2015 · 29 · 27
15. 10.1007/s10856-010-4085-610.1007/s10856-010-4085-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msec.2011.07.00910.1016/j.msec.2011.07.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.01610.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.016 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.610-613.122410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.610-613.1224 ↗
19. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.342-343.68510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.342-343.685 ↗
20. Liu Q · J Biomed Eng · 2005 · 22 · 1193
21. 10.1088/1612-2011/13/5/05560110.1088/1612-2011/13/5/055601 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.05910.1016/j.msec.2018.08.059 ↗
23. Gao J · J Func Mater · 1998 · 6 · 635
24. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02513.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02513.x ↗
25. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.07.009 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.b.3334410.1002/jbm.b.33344 ↗
28. Von Recum AF · 1997
29. 10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00134-310.1016/S0955-2219(96)00134-3 ↗
30. Zhang C · J Chin Surg · 1993 · 31 · 722
31. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00527.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00527.x ↗
32. 10.1021/cm035337p10.1021/cm035337p ↗
33. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00320-010.1016/S0955-2219(03)00320-0 ↗