journal article·2016-04Open access

The Effect of Different Adhesives and Setting Times on Bond Strength between Biodentine and Composite

Hakan Çolak, Uğur Tokay, Recep Uzgur, Zeynep Uzgur, Ertuğrul Ercan, Mehmet M. Hamidi

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3 different adhesives with different functional monomers, on the shear bond strength (SBS) of Biodentine ® . Methods Acrylic blocks (n = 90) were prepared and a 2-mm height x 4-mm diameter hole was opened in each block. Every hole was completely restored with Biodentine ® . Before preparation of composite restorations over the Biodentine ® (2-mm height x 2-mm diameter), 3 different adhesives (Etch-37 (37%) w/BAC by Bisco & Prime Bond N&T, Clearfil S 3 Bond and Adper Prompt L-Pop) were applied. SBS was evaluated using a universal testing machine, and failure mode for each sample was recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results When the megapascal values of all groups were compared, although there was no statistically significant difference in the different setting times (p>0.05), statistically significant differences were observed among all adhesive groups (p<0.05). Moreover, the highest SBS values were observed in the Clearfil S 3 Bond group. Conclusions Clinical performance of Biodentine ® may be affected by adhesive procedures and its setting time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental materials and restorations · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Zirve University, Gaziantep - Turkey

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Zirve University, Gaziantep - Turkey

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zirve University, Gaziantep - Turkey

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale - Turkey

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.00410.1016/j.dental.2015.01.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.02010.1016/j.dental.2008.02.020 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01995.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01995.x ↗
4. 10.1177/002203451246083310.1177/0022034512460833 ↗
5. 10.1590/1678-77572013066010.1590/1678-775720130660 ↗
6. Van Meerbeek B · Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent · 2003 · 28 · 215
7. 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-710.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7 ↗
8. 10.1177/15440591040830060410.1177/154405910408300604 ↗
9. 10.1155/2013/62610310.1155/2013/626103 ↗
10. 10.1002/jemt.2234010.1002/jemt.22340 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.01010.1016/j.dental.2013.12.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.00910.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.009 ↗
14. Tosun G · Int J Paediatr Dent · 2008 · 18 · 6210.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00856.x ↗