Engineering Thermoplastics for Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Perspective with Experimental Evidence to Support Functional Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Background Among additive manufacturing techniques, the filament-based technique involves what is referred to as fused deposition modeling (FDM). FDM materials are currently limited to a selected number of polymers. The present study focused on investigating the potential of using high-end engineering polymers in FDM. In addition, a critical review of the materials available on the market compared with those studied here was completed. Methods Different engineering thermoplastics, ranging from industrial grade polycarbonates to novel polyetheretherketones (PEEKs), were processed by FDM. Prior to this, for innovative filaments based on PEEK, extrusion processing was carried out. Mechanical properties (i.e., tensile and flexural) were investigated for each extruded material. An industrial-type FDM machine (Stratasys Fortus® 400 mc) was used to fully characterize the effect of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of polycarbonate. The obtained properties were compared with samples obtained by injection molding. Finally, FDM samples made of PEEK were also characterized and compared with those obtained by injection molding. Results The effect of raster to raster air gap and raster angle on tensile and flexural properties of printed PC was evidenced; the potential of PEEK filaments, as novel FDM material, was highlighted in comparison to state of the art materials. Conclusions Comparison with injection molded parts allowed to better understand FDM potential for functional applications. The study discussed pros and cons of the different materials. Finally, the development of novel PEEK filaments achieved important results offering a novel solution to the market when high mechanical and thermal properties are required.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department for Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Catania - Italy
UdR National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology, Florence - Italy
Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Milan - Italy
Roboze, Bari - Italy
National Research Council, Institute for Polymers Composites and Biomaterials, Catania - Italy
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
2. 10.5301/jabfm.500025210.5301/jabfm.5000252 ↗
3. 10.5301/JABFM.2013.1083210.5301/JABFM.2013.10832 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009 ↗
5. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-001210.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
6. 10.1080/1042691000891297610.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.255610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.2556 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
10. Hossain MS
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.01810.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.054 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-010.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 ↗
18. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/01501410.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015014 ↗
19. 10.1080/17452759.2015.109705310.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 ↗
20. Toth JM
21. Sobieraj MC
22. Kurtz SM
23. Oxford Performance Materials. CMF & orthopedics http://www.oxfordpm.com/cmf-orthopedics. Accessed January 11, 2017.
24. 10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
25. Rahman KM · Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE 2015), November 13-19, 2015. Houston, TX
26. Cicala G · Congress of the INSTM, July 13-15, 2016. Ischia Porto, Italy
27. 10.5301/jabfm.500033510.5301/jabfm.5000335 ↗
28. Stratasys. Kelly Manufacturing: direct digital manufacturing reduces instrument part cost 5% and lead time 93%. http://www.stratasys.com/resources/case-studies/aerospace/kelly-manufacturing. Accessed November 10, 2016.
29. Stratasys. Stratasys 3D printing keeps NASA satellite on time and on budget – FDM strong enough for space. http://blog.stratasys.com/2015/02/12/nasa-3d-printing-fortus/. Accessed November 10, 2016.
30. ShermanLM Additive manufacturing: materials for “real-world” parts. Plastic Materials. March 2014 http://www.ptonline.com/articles/additive-manufacturing-materials-for-real-world-parts. Accessed January 11, 2017.
31. 10.1002/pen.2137810.1002/pen.21378 ↗