journal article·2016-04Open access

Do Adhesive Systems Influence the Color Match of Resin Composites?

Débora D. Ritter, Rachel O. Rocha, Fabio Z.M. Soares, Tathiane L. Lenzi

Abstract

Background This in vitro study evaluated the influence of adhesive systems on the color match of a resin composite with different translucencies. Methods Sixty disk-shaped specimens were made with A2 and opaque A2 (OA2) shades of nanohybrid resin composite Z250 XT. Specimens of each shade (n = 30) were randomly reassigned to 3 subgroups according to adhesive system: a 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), a 2-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive). The bonding agents were applied to resin composite specimens following the manufacturers’ recommendations. Additionally, 5 disk samples of each adhesive system were prepared. Colorimetric evaluation (CIE L*a*b* system) was performed immediately after polishing the sample and application of the adhesive systems. Color changes (ΔE and ΔE 00 ) were calculated between 2 measurements. Color coordinates L*, a* and b* of the adhesive disks were also assessed. The data obtained were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results The application of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to the resin composite A2 shade resulted in the highest color change (p<0.01; ΔE = 3.1 ± 0.7 and ΔE 00 = 1.8 ± 0.4). However, no significant difference was observed among adhesive systems when applied to the resin composite OA2 shade (p>0.05). Scotchbond Universal Adhesive revealed augmented yellowing and greening in comparison with other experimental groups. Conclusions The universal adhesive tested resulted in higher visually perceptible color changes when using a more translucent resin composite shade, but this was clinically acceptable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Ocular Disorders and Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate Program in Dental Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil

Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2341/07-BL210.2341/07-BL2 ↗
2. 10.1177/0022034578057009070110.1177/00220345780570090701 ↗
3. 10.1111/jerd.1211310.1111/jerd.12113 ↗
4. Dozic A · Quintessence Int · 2010 · 41 · 567
5. 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60039-610.1016/S0022-3913(13)60039-6 ↗
6. 10.1067/mpr.2001.11538510.1067/mpr.2001.115385 ↗
7. 10.1111/jerd.1212810.1111/jerd.12128 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.01010.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.010 ↗
9. 10.4012/dmj.26.2110.4012/dmj.26.21 ↗
10. Lee Y-K · Am J Dent · 2007 · 20 · 27
11. 10.1590/S0103-6440200700020000610.1590/S0103-64402007000200006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.00310.1016/j.dental.2008.08.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.01510.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.01610.1016/j.dental.2008.01.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.01410.1016/j.dental.2008.01.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.01710.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017 ↗
18. 10.1111/jerd.1214910.1111/jerd.12149 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.00810.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1002/col.2007010.1002/col.20070 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.00510.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005 ↗
22. Mortier E · Oper Dent · 2004 · 29 · 669
23. 10.5301/jabfm.500022810.5301/jabfm.5000228 ↗