Do Adhesive Systems Influence the Color Match of Resin Composites?
Source abstract
Abstract
Background This in vitro study evaluated the influence of adhesive systems on the color match of a resin composite with different translucencies. Methods Sixty disk-shaped specimens were made with A2 and opaque A2 (OA2) shades of nanohybrid resin composite Z250 XT. Specimens of each shade (n = 30) were randomly reassigned to 3 subgroups according to adhesive system: a 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), a 2-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive). The bonding agents were applied to resin composite specimens following the manufacturers’ recommendations. Additionally, 5 disk samples of each adhesive system were prepared. Colorimetric evaluation (CIE L*a*b* system) was performed immediately after polishing the sample and application of the adhesive systems. Color changes (ΔE and ΔE 00 ) were calculated between 2 measurements. Color coordinates L*, a* and b* of the adhesive disks were also assessed. The data obtained were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results The application of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to the resin composite A2 shade resulted in the highest color change (p<0.01; ΔE = 3.1 ± 0.7 and ΔE 00 = 1.8 ± 0.4). However, no significant difference was observed among adhesive systems when applied to the resin composite OA2 shade (p>0.05). Scotchbond Universal Adhesive revealed augmented yellowing and greening in comparison with other experimental groups. Conclusions The universal adhesive tested resulted in higher visually perceptible color changes when using a more translucent resin composite shade, but this was clinically acceptable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Ocular Disorders and Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Program in Dental Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil
Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2341/07-BL210.2341/07-BL2 ↗
2. 10.1177/0022034578057009070110.1177/00220345780570090701 ↗
3. 10.1111/jerd.1211310.1111/jerd.12113 ↗
4. Dozic A · Quintessence Int · 2010 · 41 · 567
5. 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60039-610.1016/S0022-3913(13)60039-6 ↗
6. 10.1067/mpr.2001.11538510.1067/mpr.2001.115385 ↗
7. 10.1111/jerd.1212810.1111/jerd.12128 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.01010.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.010 ↗
9. 10.4012/dmj.26.2110.4012/dmj.26.21 ↗
10. Lee Y-K · Am J Dent · 2007 · 20 · 27
11. 10.1590/S0103-6440200700020000610.1590/S0103-64402007000200006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.00310.1016/j.dental.2008.08.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.01510.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.01610.1016/j.dental.2008.01.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.01410.1016/j.dental.2008.01.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.01710.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017 ↗
18. 10.1111/jerd.1214910.1111/jerd.12149 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.00810.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1002/col.2007010.1002/col.20070 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.00510.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005 ↗
22. Mortier E · Oper Dent · 2004 · 29 · 669
23. 10.5301/jabfm.500022810.5301/jabfm.5000228 ↗