journal article·2026-04Open access

Development and characterization of a smart obstetric dressing with a visual indication function

Chi-Kang Lin, Ting-Teng Wang, Meng-Yi Bai

Abstract

Excessive adhesion between dressings and the wound bed often causes secondary tissue damage and delays healing during dressing removal. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a multifunctional moisture-containing nonwoven dressing composed of silk fibroin protein (SF), polycaprolactone (PCL), and ellagic acid (EA) to improve wound healing while allowing visual assessment of moisture. A composite nonwoven fabric integrating SF, PCL, and EA was fabricated and characterized using spectroscopic analysis to evaluate its fluorescence properties. In vitro cytocompatibility was assessed in the four fibroblast cell lines using cell viability assays. In vivo wound-healing efficacy was investigated in an animal model, and histological evaluation was performed using Masson’s trichrome staining and histomorphometric analysis. Spectroscopic measurements indicated that SF and EA synergistically produced bright blue-violet fluorescence under UV illumination, with the fluorescence intensity increasing proportionally to the SF concentration. Cytocompatibility assays confirmed excellent biocompatibility, with all treatment groups maintaining >80% cell viability and the indicator fabric alone exceeding 100%. In vivo studies revealed that both the SF-based indicator fabric and the EA-integrated dressing significantly accelerated re-epithelialization and dermal remodeling compared to a commercial hydrogel control. Histological analysis revealed denser collagen deposition and increased neovascularization in the SF-treated wounds. The SF/PCL/EA moisture-indicating dressing demonstrated dual functionality by serving as an effective visual indicator of exudate and promoting tissue repair. This composite dressing provides both therapeutic and diagnostic benefits for advanced wound-care applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City, Taiwan

Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Defense Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan

Funding

National Science Council

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-00567110.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671 ↗
2. 10.1017/ice.2023.6710.1017/ice.2023.67 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41378-024-00801-610.1038/s41378-024-00801-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11191710.1016/j.matdes.2023.111917 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.00210.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.00510.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.01.00310.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.01.003 ↗
8. Bishopp A, Oakes A, Antoine-Pitterson P, et al. The preventative effect of hydrocolloid dressings on nasal bridge pressure ulceration in acute non-invasive ventilation. Ulster Med J 2019; 88(1): 17–20.
9. 10.1126/science.118893610.1126/science.1188936 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.02310.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023 ↗
11. 10.3390/insects1302011710.3390/insects13020117 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.07.00310.1016/j.mtla.2018.07.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.08910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.089 ↗
14. 10.1080/09205063.2017.139471110.1080/09205063.2017.1394711 ↗
15. 10.2147/DDDT.S16544010.2147/DDDT.S165440 ↗
16. 10.1021/jf103894m10.1021/jf103894m ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.05.01810.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.05.018 ↗
18. 10.3390/ijms24171315310.3390/ijms241713153 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12802410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128024 ↗
20. 10.1308/rcsann.2023.008310.1308/rcsann.2023.0083 ↗
21. 10.3390/ijerph2007528410.3390/ijerph20075284 ↗
22. Toon CD, Ramamoorthy R, Davidson BR, et al. Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD010259.
23. Zhang T, Zhang F, Chen Z, et al. Comparison of early and delayed removal of dressing following primary closure of clean and contaminated surgical wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp Ther Med 2020; 19(5): 3219–3226.
24. 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.Sup1.1249510.12968/bjcn.2004.9.Sup1.12495 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1112193310.3390/polym11121933 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10984210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109842 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20221051710.1002/adma.202210517 ↗
28. 10.3389/fcell.2021.66581310.3389/fcell.2021.665813 ↗
29. 10.1039/D4TB01231C10.1039/D4TB01231C ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20120367210.1002/adfm.201203672 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6RA28460D10.1039/C6RA28460D ↗
32. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9359-7_310.1007/978-1-4613-9359-7_3 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0706410.1038/srep07064 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.014 ↗
35. 10.1038/nature0180910.1038/nature01809 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-010.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0 ↗
38. 10.1080/00914037.2015.110324110.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 ↗
39. Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS, et al. Tissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences. Asaio J 2000; 70(1): 140–144.
40. 10.1021/ja01317a05310.1021/ja01317a053 ↗
41. 10.3390/chemengineering706010410.3390/chemengineering7060104 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.10.03410.1016/j.ejphar.2007.10.034 ↗
43. 10.1093/carcin/bgi02410.1093/carcin/bgi024 ↗
44. 10.1371/journal.pone.001898610.1371/journal.pone.0018986 ↗
45. 10.1039/C4CC07563C10.1039/C4CC07563C ↗
46. 10.1038/sj.bjc.660499810.1038/sj.bjc.6604998 ↗
47. 10.1515/HF.2002.00310.1515/HF.2002.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.12047210.1016/j.saa.2021.120472 ↗
49. 10.3390/molecules2717570910.3390/molecules27175709 ↗
50. 10.3390/ijms2409833110.3390/ijms24098331 ↗
51. 10.1109/TBME.2016.263252210.1109/TBME.2016.2632522 ↗
52. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x ↗
53. 10.1109/TBME.2014.235863210.1109/TBME.2014.2358632 ↗
54. 10.1111/wrr.1290510.1111/wrr.12905 ↗
55. 10.1038/nature1652110.1038/nature16521 ↗