In situ study on reverse polarity effect in Cu/Sn–9Zn/Ni interconnect undergoing liquid–solid electromigration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Synchrotron radiation real-time imaging technology was used to in situ study the interfacial reactions in Cu/Sn–9Zn/Ni solder interconnects undergoing liquid–solid electromigration (L–S EM). The reverse polarity effect, evidenced by the continuous growth of intermetallic compound (IMC) layer at the cathode and the thinning of the IMC layer at the anode, was resulted from the abnormal directional migration of Zn atoms toward the cathode in electric field. This abnormal migration behavior was induced by the positive effective charge number (Z∗) of Zn atoms, which was calculated to be +0.63 based on the Cu fluxes and the consumption kinetics of the anode Cu. Irrespective of the flowing direction of electrons, the consumption of Cu film was obvious while that of Ni film was limited. The dissolution of anode Cu followed a linear relationship with time while that of cathode Cu followed a parabolic relationship with time. It is more damaging with electrons flowing from the Ni to the Cu than that from the Cu to the Ni. The simulated Zn concentration distributions gave an explanation on the relationship between abnormal migration behavior of Zn atoms and the dissolution of Cu film under electron wind force. The abnormal directional migration of Zn atoms toward the cathode prevented the dissolution of cathode substrate, which is beneficial to improve the EM reliability of micro-bump solder interconnects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · 3D IC and TSV technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Hsiao · Science · 2012 · 336 · 100710.1126/science.1216511 ↗
2. Tu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 545110.1063/1.1611263 ↗
3. Yeh · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 80 · 58010.1063/1.1432443 ↗
4. Lin · Acta Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 202910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.014 ↗
5. Tsai · J. Electron. Mater. · 2006 · 35 · 100510.1007/BF02692560 ↗
6. Alam · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 61310.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.031 ↗
7. Cahoon · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1997 · 28 · 58310.1007/s11661-997-0044-3 ↗
8. Huang · J. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 23 · 25010.1557/JMR.2008.0024 ↗
9. Zhang · J. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 23 · 337010.1557/JMR.2008.0413 ↗
10. Huang · Scripta Mater. · 2013 · 68 · 85310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.007 ↗
11. Huang · J. Electron. Mater. · 2013 · 42 · 297510.1007/s11664-013-2690-0 ↗
12. Huang · J. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 49 · 175510.1007/s10853-013-7862-z ↗
13. Chen · J. Alloys Comp. · 2010 · 504 · 53510.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.158 ↗
14. Zhang · J. Electron. Mater. · 2009 · 38 · 42510.1007/s11664-008-0594-1 ↗
15. Blech · J. Appl. Phys. · 1976 · 47 · 120310.1063/1.322842 ↗
16. Tu · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 140910.1103/PhysRevB.45.1409 ↗
17. Gan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 06351410.1063/1.1861151 ↗
18. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 246110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00076-9 ↗
19. Adams · Phys. Rev. · 1967 · 156 · 17810.1103/PhysRev.156.178 ↗
20. Ho · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1989 · 52 · 30110.1088/0034-4885/52/3/002 ↗
21. Kumar · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 04491510.1063/1.4863641 ↗
22. Smolin · Sov. Phys. – Sol. · 1961 · 3 · 1536
23. Liu · J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. · 2013 · 24 · 211
24. Yu · Intermetallics · 2012 · 26 · 1110.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.046 ↗