journal article·2004-08

First-principles calculations of stability of δ-Pu–Am alloys

Alex Landa, Per Söderlind

Journal of Alloys and Compounds· Volume 376· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

AbstractFirst-principles methods are employed to study the ground-state properties of Pu–Am systems. Calculated density of -Pu 100−c Am c alloys( c = 30at.%) agrees well with the experimental data. The paramagnetic (PM) → antiferromagnetic (AF) transition temperature (T c )ofPu 100−c Am c alloys is calculated by the Monte Carlo technique. By introducing Am into the system, one could lower T c from ∼548K (purePu) to 372K (Pu 70 Am 30 ). We also found that, contrary to pure Pu where this transition destabilizes the -phase, Pu 3 Am compound remainsstable in the antiferromagnetic phase that correlates with recent discovery of a Curie–Weiss behavior in Pu 100−c Am c system at c ≈ 24at.%.© 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: -Pu–Am; Magnetism 1. IntroductionIt is strongly believed that many anomalous physical prop-erties of Pu metal, such as many allotropic forms ( , , , , and e), significant ( ∼24%) volume increase for the → transition, negative coefficient of thermal expansionof -Pu, low (∼913K) melting point, etc., are due to theparticular position of Pu in the Periodic Table. In respect toa progressive filling of the 5f sub-shell, Pu is located on theborder between the light actinides (Th–Np) with itinerant 5felectrons and the heavy actinides (Am–Lr) with 5f localizedstates. In other words, the transition from delocalized to lo-calized 5f electrons takes place within the plutonium phasediagram resulting in numerous allotropic forms.Among these phases -Pu has received a significant in-terest in the metallurgical community because of its highductility that makes it easy to machine and form. This phaseis also the most interesting for physicist because its 5f elec-trons exhibit intermediate behavior between delocalizationand localization [1]. The -Pu phase is stable at temperaturesbetween 593 and 736K, but can be stabilized at lower tem-peratures by alloying Pu with a foreign element, so called‘ -stabilizer’ (or deltagen). Among the elements known as -stabilizers, i.e., Al, Ga, Zn, Zr, Sc, In, Tl, Am, and Ce, only
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Johansson · Phys. Rev. B · 1975 · 11 · 274010.1103/PhysRevB.11.2740 ↗
2. Ellinger · J. Nucl. Mat. · 1964 · 12 · 22610.1016/0022-3115(64)90145-X ↗
3. Ellinger · J. Nucl. Mat. · 1962 · 5 · 16510.1016/0022-3115(62)90096-X ↗
4. Cox · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 75110.1103/PhysRevB.51.751 ↗
5. Faure · J. Alloys Comp. · 1996 · 244 · 13110.1016/S0925-8388(96)02506-6 ↗
6. Richard · J. Alloys Comp. · 1998 · 271 · 87910.1016/S0925-8388(98)00239-4 ↗
7. Allen · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 21410710.1103/PhysRevB.65.214107 ↗
8. Nelson · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 22420610.1103/PhysRevB.67.224206 ↗
9. M. Dormeval, Electronic structure of Pu–Ce(–Ga) and Pu–Am(–Ga) alloys stabilized in the δ-phase. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite de Bourgogne, Dijon, France, 2001.
10. Dormeval · J. Alloys Comp. · 2003 · 350 · 8610.1016/S0925-8388(02)00997-0 ↗
11. Ellinger · J. Nucl. Mat. · 1966 · 20 · 8310.1016/0022-3115(66)90024-9 ↗
12. Heathman · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 296110.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2961 ↗
13. M.J. Fluss, in: Plutonium Futures Conference III, Albuquerque, NM, July 2003, p. 146.10.1063/1.1594583 ↗
14. Wang · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2000 · 12 · L3110.1063/1.1302845 ↗
15. Postnikov · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 17 · 43810.1016/S0927-0256(00)00064-1 ↗
16. Söderlind · Europhys. Lett. · 2001 · 55 · 52510.1209/epl/i2001-00447-3 ↗
17. Söderlind · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 20510910.1103/PhysRevB.66.205109 ↗
18. Landa · J. Alloys Comp. · 2003 · 354 · 9910.1016/S0925-8388(03)00050-1 ↗
19. Landa · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · L37110.1088/0953-8984/15/24/103 ↗
20. Kutepov · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · 260710.1088/0953-8984/15/17/315 ↗
21. Robert · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 07510910.1103/PhysRevB.68.075109 ↗
22. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) 8377.10.1088/0953-8984/15/49/015 ↗
23. Niklasson · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 23510510.1103/PhysRevB.67.235105 ↗
24. Abrikosov · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 1653210.1103/PhysRevB.47.16532 ↗
25. Ruban · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 15 · 11910.1016/S0927-0256(99)00003-8 ↗
26. Wills · Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 36 · 380910.1103/PhysRevB.36.3809 ↗
27. Price · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 494510.1103/PhysRevB.39.4945 ↗
28. Vitos · Phys. Rev. A · 2000 · 61 · 05251110.1103/PhysRevA.61.052511 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 10046.10.1103/PhysRevB.62.10046 ↗
30. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
31. Györffy · J. Phys. F: Met. Phys · 1985 · 15 · 133710.1088/0305-4608/15/6/018 ↗
32. Johnson · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 208810.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2088 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 9701.10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9701 ↗
34. K. Binder, Application of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, Springer, Berlin, 1987.10.1007/978-3-642-51703-7 ↗
35. Söderlind · Nature · 1995 · 374 · 52410.1038/374524a0 ↗
36. Söderlind · Adv. Phys. · 1998 · 47 · 95910.1080/000187398243492 ↗
37. Arko · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 177310.1103/PhysRevB.62.1773 ↗
38. Havela · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 23511810.1103/PhysRevB.65.235118 ↗