journal article·2007

Investigation of a Hybrid Technique for Seismic Retrofitting of Bare Frames

Md. Nafiur Rahman, Tetsuo Yamakawa

Publisher page

Abstract

To enhance the lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility of reinforced concrete bare frames, which are vulnerable to large seismic excitation, a simple, convenient, economic, and effective retrofit concept of cast-in-site partial or full, thick hybrid wall using additional concrete sandwiched by steel plates and high-strength steel bar prestressing is proposed in this paper. The frames were retrofitted by casting additional wing-walls adjacent to columns (referred to as opening-type wing-walls) and additional panel-walls into bare frames (referred to as non-opening-type panel-walls). The frames thus retrofitted were experimentally investigated under simultaneous cyclic lateral forces and a constant vertical load. It was verified that the proposed retrofit technique for bare frames is effective in terms of increasing lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility. For the analytic assessment of the proposed retrofit technique, design guidelines to calculate flexural strength, shear strength, and lateral force resistance capacity are suggested.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Engineering and Science, University of the Ryukyus, Japan.

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of the Ryukyus, Japan.

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. American Concrete Institute (2005). “Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05).”
2. ACI-ASCE Committee 326 (1962). “Shear and diagonal tension.” Journal of American Concrete Institute (ACI), 59, January, February, March, 1-30, 277-334, 352-396.
3. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N. and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined con-crete.” J. of Structural Engg., ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
4. Park, R. and Paulay, T. (1975). “Reinforced concrete structures.” John Wiley & Sons, 319-325.
5. Paulay, T., Park, R. and Phillips, M. H. (1974). “Hori-zontal construction joints in cast in place reinforced concrete.” Shear in reinforced concrete, ACI Special Publication 42, 2, 599-616.
6. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). “Seismic de-sign of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings.” John Wiley & Sons, 129, 480.
7. Rahman, M. N., Yamakawa, T., Morishita, Y. and Na-kada, K. (2005). “Investigation of seismic retrofit for pilotis frames utilizing extremely thick hybrid walls.” Proc. of the Japan Concrete Institute (JCI), 27, (2), 1117-1122.
8. Yamakawa, T., Rahman, M. N. and Morishita, Y. (2006). “Experimental investigation and analytical approach for seismic retrofit of RC column with wing-wall.” J. of Structural and Construction Engg., AIJ, (608), 109-117.10.3130/aijs.71.109_2 ↗