Tests and Design of Welded-bar Angle Connections of Precast Floor Elements
Source abstract
Abstract
Welded floor-to-floor connections are widely employed in dry-assembled precast concrete decks with the main aims to stiffen the diaphragmatic action under horizontal loads and increase robustness of the construction. Bars or slugs are often preferred to plates for their smaller room, better allowance, and cost-effectiveness. Despite welded bar connections are mentioned in many official design codes, their design rules are not therein specified, which was only recently done in ISO Standard 20987:2019 on simplified design guidelines for mechanical connections between precast concrete structural elements in buildings. This standard is the result of EU’s Safecast Research Projects FP7-SME-2007-2 and GA 218417:2009, in the framework of which many structural connections of precast structures were tested and investigated at different scale levels, although specific local testing of welded bar connections was not carried out. Thus, the quoted ISO formulation lacked from direct experimental check. This paper aims at filling this gap by presenting the results of shear tests on floor-to-floor connections made by bars welded to rebar-anchored inclined angles. The tests were carried out considering anchorage rebars having different shape and diameter. Moreover, the validity of the currently available ISO design rule is commented, highlighting a disproportioned degree of conservativeness referring to concrete spalling failure. An updated formulation is proposed based on a novel mechanical behaviour model matching the experimental observations and results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Dunant, 3, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, P.za Leo¬nardo da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy.
DLC Consulting s.r.l., Viale Monza, 265, 20125, Milan, Italy.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Angel, M. N., Correal, J. F. and Restrepo, J. I., (2019). “Cyclic behavior of hollow-core diaphragm subassemblies.” PCI Journal, 64(2), 80-96.10.15554/pcij64.2-02 ↗
2. 2) Bournas, D. A., Negro, P. and Molina, F. J., (2013). “Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: Behaviour of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms.” Engineering Structures, 57, 609-627.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.046 ↗
3. 3) Cao, L. and Naito, C., (2009). “Precast concrete double-tee connectors, Part 2: Shear behavior.” PCI Journal, 54(1), 97-115.10.15554/pcij.03012009.97.115 ↗
4. 4) Cleland, N. M. and Ghosh, S. K., (2002). “Untopped precast concrete diaphragms in high-seismic applications.” PCI Journal, 47(6), 94-99.10.15554/pcij.11012002.94.99 ↗
5. 5) Dal Lago, B., (2017). “Experimental and numerical assessment of the service behaviour of an innovative long-span precast roof element.” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 11(2), 261-273.10.1007/s40069-017-0187-6 ↗
6. 6) Dal Lago, B., Bianchi, S. and Biondini, F., (2019). “Diaphragm effectiveness of precast concrete structures with cladding panels under seismic action.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(1), 473-495.10.1007/s10518-018-0452-3 ↗
7. 7) Dal Lago, B., Biondini, F. and Toniolo, G., (2017a). “Friction-based dissipative devices for precast concrete panels.” Engineering Structures, 147, 356-371.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.050 ↗
8. 8) Dal Lago, B., Biondini, F. and Toniolo, G., (2018a). “Experimental tests on multiple-slit devices for precast concrete panels.” Engineering Structures, 167, 420-430.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.035 ↗
9. 9) Dal Lago, B. and Ferrara, L., (2018). “Efficacy of roof-to-beam mechanical connections on the diaphragm behaviour of precast decks with spaced roof elements.” Engineering Structures, 176, 681-696.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.027 ↗
10. 10) Dal Lago, B. and Gajera, K., (2021). “Role of dry-assembled precast decks with box-section slab elements against progressive collapse in high-rise panel and frame/wall buildings.” In: Proceedings of the fib Symposium 2021 - Concrete Structure: New Trends for Eco-Efficiency and Performance, Lisbon 14-16 June 2021. Lausanne, Switzerland: Fédération Internationale du Béton.
11. 11) Dal Lago, B., Negro, P. and Dal Lago, A., (2018b). “Seismic design and performance of dry-assembled precast structures with adaptable joints.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 106, 182-195.10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.016 ↗
12. 12) Dal Lago, B., Toniolo, G., Felicetti, R. and Lamperti Tornaghi, M., (2017b). “End support connection of precast roof elements by bolted steel angles.” Structural Concrete, 18(5), 755-767.10.1002/suco.201600218 ↗
13. 13) Dolce, M., Lorusso, V. D. and Masi, A., (1994). “Seismic response of building structures with flexible inelastic diaphragm.” The Structural Design of Special and Tall Buildings, 3, 87-106.10.1002/tal.4320030202 ↗
14. 14) EN, (2004). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings (EN 1992-1-1:2004).” Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
15. 15) fib, (2008). “Structural connections for precast concrete buildings (fib Bulletin 43).” Lausanne, Switzerland: Fédération Internationale du Béton.
16. 16) Fleischman, R. B., Naito, C., Restrepo, J. I., Sause, R. and Ghosh, S. K., (2005a). “Precast diaphragm seismic design methodology (DSDM) project, Part 1: Design philosophy and research approach.” PCI Journal, 50(5), 68-83.10.15554/pcij.09012005.68.83 ↗
17. 17) Fleischman, R. B., Naito, C., Restrepo, J. I., Sause, R., Ghosh, S. K., Wan, G., Schoettler, M. and Cao, L., (2005b). “Precast diaphragm seismic design methodology (DSDM) project, Part 2: Research program.” PCI Journal, 50(6), 14-31.10.15554/pcij.11012005.14.31 ↗
18. 18) Fleischman, R. B., Sause, R., Pessiki, S. and Rhodes, A. B., (1998). “Seismic behavior of precast parking structure diaphragms.” PCI Journal, 43(1), 38-53.10.15554/pcij.01011998.38.53 ↗
19. 19) Hendricks, R., Naito, C. and Osborn, A., (2018). “Flange-to-flange double-tee connections subjected to vehicular loading, Part 1: Numerical assessment approach.” PCI Journal, 63(4), 41-53.10.15554/pcij63.4-02 ↗
20. 20) Hofheins, C. L., Reaveley, L. D. and Pantelides, C. P., (2002). “Behavior of welded plate connections in precast concrete panels under simulated seismic loads.” PCI Journal, 47(4), 122-133.10.15554/pcij.07012002.122.133 ↗
21. 21) ISO, (2019). “Simplified design for mechanical connections between precast concrete structural elements in buildings (ISO 20987:2019).” Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
22. 22) JRC, (2012). “Design guidelines for connections of precast structures under seismic actions (Joint Research Center Scientific and Policy Report EUR 25377 EN).” Luxembourg, Belgium: Publication Office of the EU.
23. 23) Menegotto, M. and Monti, G., (2005). “Waved joint for seismic-resistant precast floor diaphragms.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 31(10), 1515-1525.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1515) ↗
24. 24) Naito, C., Cao, L. and Peter, W., (2009). “Precast concrete double-tee connections, Part 1: Tension behavior.” PCI Journal, 54(4), 49-66.10.15554/pcij.01012009.49.66 ↗
25. 25) Naito, C., Hendricks, R. and Osborn, A., (2019). “Flange-to-flange double-tee connections subjected to vehicular loading, Part 2: Fatigue life assessment.” PCI Journal, 64(2), 23-38.10.15554/pcij64.2-05 ↗
26. 26) Naito, C. and Ren, R., (2013). “An evaluation method for precast concrete diaphragm connectors based on structural testing.” PCI Journal, 58(1), 106-118.10.15554/pcij.03012013.106.118 ↗
27. 27) Negro, P., Bournas, D. A. and Molina, F. J., (2013). “Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: Global response.” Engineering Structures, 57, 594-608.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.047 ↗
28. 28) Pang, R., Xu, Z., Liang, S., Zhu, X. and Hu, K., (2020). “Experimental and analytical investigation on the in-plane mechanical property of discretely connected precast RC floor diaphragm.” Journal of Building Engineering, 32, Article ID 101819.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101819 ↗
29. 29) Pincheira, J. A., Oliva, M. G. and Kusumo-Rahardjo, F. I., (1998). “Tests on double flange connectors subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading.” PCI Journal, 43(3), 82-96.10.15554/pcij.05011998.82.96 ↗
30. 30) Pincheira, J. A., Oliva, M. G. and Zheng, W., (2005). “Behavior of double-tee flange connectors subjected to in-plane monotonic and reversed cyclic loads.” PCI Journal, 50(6), 32-54.10.15554/pcij.11012005.32.54 ↗
31. 31) Porter, S. D., Juglander, J. L., Halling, M. W., Barr, P. J., Boyle, H. and Xing, S., (2011). “Flexural testing of precast bridge deck panel connections.” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 16(3), 422-430.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000173 ↗
32. 32) Ren, R. and Naito, C. J., (2013). “Precast concrete diaphragm connector performance database.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(1), 15-27.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000598 ↗
33. 33) Shaikh, A. F. and Feile, E. P., (2004). “Load testing of a precast concrete double-tee flange connector.” PCI Journal, 49(3), 84-94.10.15554/pcij.05012004.84.94 ↗
34. 34) Schoettler, M. J., Belleri, A., Zhang, D., Restrepo, J. I. and Fleischman, R. B., (2009). “Preliminary results of the shake-table testing for the development of a diaphragm seismic design methodology.” PCI Journal, 54(1), 100-124.10.15554/pcij.01012009.100.124 ↗
35. 35) Spencer, R. A. and Neille, D. S., (1976). “Cyclic tests of welded headed stud connections.” PCI Journal, 21(3), 70-83.10.15554/pcij.05011976.70.83 ↗
36. 36) Tena-Colunga, A. and Abrams P. A., (1996). “Seismic behaviour of structures with flexible diaphragms.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(4), 439-445.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(439) ↗
37. 37) van de Lindt, J. W., (2007). “Experimental behavior of mechanical in-flange connectors.” The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 1, 13-24.10.2174/1874149500701010013 ↗
38. 38) Venuti, W. J., (1970). “Diaphragm shear connectors between flanges of prestressed concrete T-beams.” PCI Journal, 15(1), 67-78.10.15554/pcij.02011970.67.78 ↗