journal article·2005Open access

Modeling the Influence of Pore Structure on the Acoustic Absorption of Enhanced Porosity Concrete

Narayanan Neithalath, Adam Marolf, Jason Weiss, Jan Olek

Abstract

This paper describes a model to predict the acoustic absorption of Enhanced Porosity Concrete (EPC). The acoustic absorption coefficient was determined experimentally using an impedance tube, while an electro-acoustic analogy was implemented to develop the predictive model, considering the pore structure of EPC as a series of resistors and inductors. The physical features of the pore network were experimentally characterized using image analysis and a pore volume characterization technique. A parameter termed “structure factor” was introduced to account for the increased density of air that is not displaced by the acoustic wave pressure. The maximum acoustic absorption coefficient was found to decrease linearly with an increase in the structure factor. The development of this model and its correlation with physical measurements enable the prediction of acoustic absorption in EPC based on the geometric features of the pore structure. This model enabled a parametric study to be conducted to ascertain the effects of pore size, aperture size, porosity, and specimen thickness on acoustic absorption. An optimal pore to aperture diameter ratio was observed to exist, that maximizes acoustic absorption. The parametric study is believed to be able to aid in the design of EPC for acoustic absorption by better understanding the type of pore features that should be targeted for best performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Hygrothermal properties of building materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Concrete Industry Management Program, Middle Tennessee State University

School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Allard, J. F. (1993). “Propagation of Sound in Porous Media - Modeling Sound Absorbing Materials.” Elsevier Applied Science.
2. Belgian Road Research Center, BRRC (2000). “Traffic Noises and Road Surfaces: State of the Art.” Brussels: SIRRUS project report.
3. Bernhard, R. J. (2002). “The state-of-the-art of quite highways.” In: Proceedings of 88th Purdue Road School, West Lafayette March 2002.
4. Biot, M. A. (1962). “Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1254-1264.10.1121/1.1918315 ↗
5. Boutin, C., Royer, P. and Auriault, J. L. (1998). “Acoustic absorption of porous surfacing with dual porosity.” International Journal of Solids and Structure, 35 (34-35), 4709-4737.10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00091-2 ↗
6. Brennan, M. J. and To, W. M. (2001). “Acoustic properties of rigid frame porous materials - an engineering perspective.” Applied Acoustics 62, 793-811.10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00080-3 ↗
7. BRITE/EURAM (1994). “Surface Properties of Concrete Roads in Accordance with Traffic Safety and Reduction of Noise.” Project BE 3415.
8. Francois, H. J. and Michel, B. (1993). “Acoustical characteristics of porous pavements: A new phenomenological model.” In: Proceedings of Inter Noise 93, Leuven 1993, 641-646.
9. Johnson, D. L., Koplik, J. and Dashen, R. (1987). “Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid saturated porous media.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 176, 379-402.10.1017/S0022112087000727 ↗
10. Lu, T. J., Chen, F. and He, D. (2000). “Sound absorption of cellular metals with semi open cells.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 108 (4), 1697-1709.10.1121/1.1286812 ↗
11. Maa, D. Y., (1987). “Microperforated-panel wideband absorbers.” Noise Control Engineering Journal, 29, 77-84.10.3397/1.2827694 ↗
12. Marolf, A., Neithalath, N., Sell, E., Wegner, K., Weiss, J. and Olek, J. (2004). “Influence of aggregate size and gradation on acoustic absorption of Enhanced Porosity Concrete.” ACI Materials Journal, 101 (1), 82-91.
13. Neithalath, N. (2004). “Development and Characterization of Aacoustically Efficient Cementitious Materials.” PhD Thesis, Purdue University, pp 242
14. Neithalath, N., Weiss, J. and Olek, J. (2005). “Characterizing enhanced porosity concrete using electrical impedance to predict acoustic and hydraulic performance.” Submitted to Cement and Concrete Research.
15. Stinson, M. R. and Champoux, Y. (1992). “Propagation of sound and the assignment of shape factors in model porous materials having simple pore geometries.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 91, 685-695.10.1121/1.402530 ↗
16. Stinson, M. R. and Shaw, E.A.G., (1985). “Acoustic impedance of small, circular orifices in thin plates.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 77, 2039-2042.10.1121/1.391776 ↗
17. Voronina, N. (1999). “An empirical model for rigid-frame porous materials with low porosity.” Applied Acoustics, 58, 295-304.10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00076-0 ↗
18. Wang, X. and Lu, T. J. (1999). “Optimized acoustic properties of cellular solids.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 106 (2), 756-765.10.1121/1.427094 ↗
19. Zwikker, C. and Kosten, C. W. (1949). “Sound Absorbing Materials.” Elsevier Publishing Company Inc.