journal article·2025-03Open access

Distinguishing electrotensile strain and electrobending strain

Shuo Tian, Bin Li, Yejing Dai

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 14· Issue 3

Abstract

Electrobending, an emerging phenomenon in electroactive ceramics, has recently gained significant interest; however, existing measurement methods often confound electrotensile and electrobending strains, leading to ambiguity. This study distinguishes electrotensile and electrobending strains in KNN ceramics by examining thickness, frequency, temperature, and directional dependencies, identifying a critical thickness threshold of 600 μm for electrobending in samples of 8.5 mm diameter. This threshold establishes a clear distinction between electrostriction and electrobending within the KNN system and provides a benchmark that can be applied to other systems through similar methodologies. Additionally, new electrobending parameters are defined to assess bending deformation, addressing recent misinterpretations of “giant strain” and advancing electrostrain research by introducing an electrobending framework.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Software Engineering Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. F Li. Electrostrictive effect in ferroelectrics: An alternative approach to improve piezoelectricity. 2014, 1: 011103.10.1063/1.4861260 ↗
2. G Viola. Electric field-induced transformations in bismuth sodium titanate-based materials. 2021, 122: 100837.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100837 ↗
3. JJ Wang. High piezoelectricity and low strain hysteresis in PMN–PT-based piezoelectric ceramics. 2023, 12: 792-802.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220720 ↗
4. SE Park. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. 1997, 82: 1804-1811.10.1063/1.365983 ↗
5. W Feng. Heterostrain-enabled ultrahigh electrostrain in lead-free piezoelectric. 2022, 13: 5086.10.1038/s41467-022-32825-9 ↗
6. W Li. Giant electro-strain nearly 1% in BiFeO 3-based lead-free piezoelectric ceramics through coupling morphotropic phase boundary with defect engineering. 2022, 26: 101237.10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101237 ↗
7. YX Jia. Giant electro-induced strain in lead-free relaxor ferroelectrics via defect engineering. 2023, 43: 947-956.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.058 ↗
8. G Huangfu. Giant electric field-induced strain in lead-free piezoceramics. 2022, 378: 1125-1130.10.1126/science.ade2964 ↗
9. HJ Luo. Achieving giant electrostrain of above 1% in (Bi,Na)TiO 3-based lead-free piezoelectrics via introducing oxygen-defect composition. 2023, 9: eade7078.10.1126/sciadv.ade7078 ↗
10. LX Lai. Giant electrostrain in lead-free textured piezoceramics by defect dipole design. 2023, 35: 2300519.10.1002/adma.202300519 ↗
11. BQ Wang. Giant electric field-induced strain with high temperature-stability in textured KNN-based piezoceramics for actuator applications. 2023, 33: 2214643.10.1002/adfm.202214643 ↗
12. GD Adhikary. Ultrahigh electrostrain > 1% in lead-free piezoceramics: Role of disk dimension. 2023, 134: 054101.10.1063/5.0163502 ↗
13. S Tian. Defect dipole asymmetry response induces electrobending deformation in thin piezoceramics. 2024, 133: 186802.10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.186802 ↗
14. JG Hao. Progress in high-strain perovskite piezoelectric ceramics. 2019, 135: 1-57.10.1016/j.mser.2018.08.001 ↗
15. YL Yang. Modulation of phase boundary and domain structures to engineer strain properties in BNT-based ferroelectrics. 2024, 13: 967-975.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220910 ↗
16. XB Ren. Large electric-field-induced strain in ferroelectric crystals by point-defect-mediated reversible domain switching. 2004, 3: 91-94.10.1038/nmat1051 ↗
17. B Narayan. Electrostrain in excess of 1% in polycrystalline piezoelectrics. 2018, 17: 427-431.10.1038/s41563-018-0060-2 ↗
18. ST Zhang. Giant strain in lead-free piezoceramics Bi 0.5Na 0.5TiO 3–BaTiO 3–K 0.5Na 0.5NbO 3 system. 2007, 91: 112906.10.1063/1.2783200 ↗
19. W Jo. Origin of the large strain response in (K 0.5Na 0.5)NbO 3-modified (Bi 0.5Na 0.5)TiO 3–BaTiO 3 lead-free piezoceramics. 2009, 105: 094102.10.1063/1.3121203 ↗
20. DH Jiang. Realizing large strain at low electric field in Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3-based piezoelectric ceramics via engineering lattice distortion and domain structure. 2024, 13: 1409-1421.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220945 ↗
21. S Wada. Enhanced piezoelectric property of barium titanate single crystals with engineered domain configurations. 1999, 38: 5505.10.1143/JJAP.38.5505 ↗
22. J Yin. Defect-induced superior piezoelectric response in perovskite KNbO 3. 2021, 41: 2506-2513.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.055 ↗
23. JL Jones. Saturated domain switching textures and strains in ferroelastic ceramics. 2005, 98: 024115.10.1063/1.1988978 ↗