Optimization of microstructure design for enhanced sensing performance in flexible piezoresistive sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible piezoresistive strain sensors have received significant attention due to their diverse applications in monitoring human activities and health, as well as in robotics, prosthetics, and human-computer interaction interfaces. Among the various flexible sensor types, those with microstructure designs are considered promising for strain sensing due to their simple structure, high sensitivity, extensive operational range, rapid response time, and robust stability. This review provides a concise overview of recent advancements in flexible piezoresistive sensors based on microstructure design for enhanced strain sensing performance, including the impact of microstructure on sensing mechanisms, classification of microstructure designs, fabrication methods, and practical applications. Initially, the review delves into the analysis of piezoresistive sensors' sensing mechanisms and performance parameters, exploring the relationship between microstructure design and performance enhancement. Subsequently, an in-depth discussion is presented, focusing on the primary themes of microstructure design classification, process selection, performance characteristics, and specific applications. The review employs mathematical modeling and hierarchical analysis to emphasize the directionality of different microstructures on performance enhancement and to highlight the performance advantages and applicable features of various microstructure types. In conclusion, the review examines the multifunctionality of flexible piezoresistive sensors based on microstructure design and addresses the challenges that still need to be overcome and improved, such as achieving a wide range of stretchability, high sensitivity, and robust stability. The review summarizes the research direction for enhancing sensing performance through microstructure design, aiming to assist in the advancement of flexible piezoresistive sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. GY Bae. Linearly and highly pressure-sensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. 2016, 28: 5300-5306.10.1002/adma.201600408 ↗
2. G Schwartz. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. 2013, 4: 1859.10.1038/ncomms2832 ↗
3. S Chen. Flexible and highly sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on carbonized crepe paper with corrugated structure. 2018, 10: 34646-34654.10.1021/acsami.8b13535 ↗
4. C Pang. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. 2015, 27: 634-640.10.1002/adma.201403807 ↗
5. Y Jeong. A skin-attachable, stretchable integrated system based on liquid GaInSn for wireless human motion monitoring with multi-site sensing capabilities. 2017, 9: e443.10.1038/am.2017.189 ↗
6. CM Boutry. Biodegradable and flexible arterial-pulse sensor for the wireless monitoring of blood flow. 2019, 3: 47-57.10.1038/s41551-018-0336-5 ↗
7. YL Wang. Self-powered wearable pressure sensing system for continuous healthcare monitoring enabled by flexible thin-film thermoelectric generator. 2020, 73: 104773.10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104773 ↗
8. C Bartolozzi. Robots with a sense of touch. 2016, 15: 921-925.10.1038/nmat4731 ↗
9. HB Wang. Toward perceptive soft robots: Progress and challenges. 2018, 5: 1800541.10.1002/advs.201800541 ↗
10. S Raspopovic. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. 2014, 6: 222ra19.10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820 ↗
11. A Dos Santos. E-skin bimodal sensors for robotics and prosthesis using PDMS molds engraved by laser. 2019, 19: 899.10.3390/s19040899 ↗
12. CM Boutry. A hierarchically patterned, bioinspired E-skin able to detect the direction of applied pressure for robotics. 2018, 3: eaau6914.10.1126/scirobotics.aau6914 ↗
13. K Sim. Fully rubbery integrated electronics from high effective mobility intrinsically stretchable semiconductors. 2019, 5: eaav5749.10.1126/sciadv.aav5749 ↗
14. OA Araromi. Ultra-sensitive and resilient compliant strain gauges for soft machines. 2020, 587: 219-224.10.1038/s41586-020-2892-6 ↗
15. R Yin. Wearable sensors-enabled human–machine interaction systems: From design to application. 2020, 31: 2008936.10.1002/adfm.202008936 ↗
16. YJ Tsai. Multilayered Ag NP–PEDOT–paper composite device for human–machine interfacing. 2019, 11: 10380-10388.10.1021/acsami.8b21390 ↗
17. S Jung. Reverse-micelle-induced porous pressure-sensitive rubber for wearable human−machine interfaces. 2014, 26: 4825-4830.10.1002/adma.201401364 ↗
18. XQ Liao. A highly stretchable and deformation-insensitive bionic electronic exteroceptive neural sensor for human‒machine interfaces. 2021, 80: 105548.10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105548 ↗
19. M Jung. Transparent and flexible mayan-pyramid-based pressure sensor using facile-transferred indium tin oxide for bimodal sensor applications. 2019, 9: 14040.10.1038/s41598-019-50247-4 ↗
20. T Wang. Tactile chemomechanical transduction based on an elastic microstructured array to enhance the sensitivity of portable biosensors. 2019, 31: e1803883.10.1002/adma.201803883 ↗
21. C Shang. Multi-parameter e-skin based on biomimetic mechanoreceptors and stress field sensing. 2023, 7: 19.10.1038/s41528-023-00252-5 ↗
22. AM Kamat. Biomimetic soft polymer microstructures and piezoresistive graphene MEMS sensors using sacrificial metal 3D printing. 2021, 13: 1094-1104.10.1021/acsami.0c21295 ↗
23. J Park. Tactile-direction-sensitive and stretchable electronic skins based on human-skin-inspired interlocked microstructures. 2014, 8: 12020-12029.10.1021/nn505953t ↗
24. SX Yu. Light‐boosting highly sensitive pressure sensors based on bioinspired multiscale surface structures. 2020, 30: 1907091.10.1002/adfm.201907091 ↗
25. LJ Pan. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. 2014, 5: 3002.10.1038/ncomms4002 ↗
26. HL Hu. Porous GNP/PDMS composites with significantly reduced percolation threshold of conductive filler for stretchable strain sensors. 2022, 29: 101033.10.1016/j.coco.2021.101033 ↗
27. F Zhang. Significant strain-rate dependence of sensing behavior in TiO 2@carbon fibre/PDMS composites for flexible strain sensors. 2021, 10: 1350-1359.10.1007/s40145-021-0509-7 ↗
28. SCB Mannsfeld. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. 2010, 9: 859-864.10.1038/nmat2834 ↗
29. N Alamusi. Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. 2011, 11: 10691-10723.10.3390/s111110691 ↗
30. X Zeng. A bioinspired three-dimensional integrated e-skin for multiple mechanical stimuli recognition. 2022, 92: 106777.10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106777 ↗
31. A Georgopoulou. Sensorized robotic skin based on piezoresistive sensor fiber composites produced with injection molding of liquid silicone. 2021, 13: 1226.10.3390/polym13081226 ↗
32. J Kim. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. 2014, 5: 5747.10.1038/ncomms6747 ↗
33. YC Wu. Piezoresistive stretchable strain sensors with human machine interface demonstrations. 2018, 279: 46-52.10.1016/j.sna.2018.05.036 ↗
34. T Yang. Hierarchically microstructure-bioinspired flexible piezoresistive bioelectronics. 2021, 15: 11555-11563.10.1021/acsnano.1c01606 ↗
35. ZM Zhang. Simple and efficient pressure sensor based on PDMS wrapped CNT arrays. 2019, 155: 71-76.10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.018 ↗
36. YJ Gao. Wearable microfluidic diaphragm pressure sensor for health and tactile touch monitoring. 2017, 29: 1701985.10.1002/adma.201701985 ↗
37. G Kim. Spatially pressure-mapped thermochromic interactive sensor. 2017, 29: 1606120.10.1002/adma.201606120 ↗
38. MY Zheng. Strain sensors based on chromium nanoparticle arrays. 2014, 6: 3930-3933.10.1039/C3NR04135B ↗
39. CB Huang. Molecule-graphene hybrid materials with tunable mechanoresponse: Highly sensitive pressure sensors for health monitoring. 2019, 31: e1804600.10.1002/adma.201804600 ↗
40. YX Zhao. Low-temperature synthesis of 2D MoS 2 on a plastic substrate for a flexible gas sensor. 2018, 10: 9338-9345.10.1039/C8NR00108A ↗
41. YZ Htwe. Properties enhancement of graphene and chemical reduction silver nanoparticles conductive inks printed on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) substrate. 2019, 256: 116120.10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.116120 ↗
42. T Vuorinen. Inkjet-printed graphene/PEDOT:PSS temperature sensors on a skin-conformable polyurethane substrate. 2016, 6: 35289.10.1038/srep35289 ↗
43. G Hassan. Inkjet printed self-healable strain sensor based on graphene and magnetic iron oxide nano-composite on engineered polyurethane substrate. 2020, 10: 18234.10.1038/s41598-020-75175-6 ↗
44. T Liu. Triboelectric-nanogenerator-based soft energy-harvesting skin enabled by toughly bonded elastomer/hydrogel hybrids. 2018, 12: 2818-2826.10.1021/acsnano.8b00108 ↗
45. WH Yeo. Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin. 2013, 25: 2773-2778.10.1002/adma.201204426 ↗
46. F Zhang. Multimodal strain and temperature sensor by hybridizing reduced graphene oxide and PEDOT:PSS. 2020, 187: 107959.10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107959 ↗
47. null10.1007/978-3-030-71225-9_3 ↗
48. H Yang. Piezoresistive response of graphene rubber composites considering the tunneling effect. 2020, 139: 103943.10.1016/j.jmps.2020.103943 ↗
49. M Amjadi. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. 2014, 8: 5154-5163.10.1021/nn501204t ↗
50. B Park. Dramatically enhanced mechanosensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio of nanoscale crack-based sensors: Effect of crack depth. 2016, 28: 8130-8137.10.1002/adma.201602425 ↗
51. YJ Zhou. Significant stretchability enhancement of a crack-based strain sensor combined with high sensitivity and superior durability for motion monitoring. 2019, 11: 7405-7414.10.1021/acsami.8b20768 ↗
52. MY Wang. A percolation model for piezoresistivity in conductor–polymer composites. 2019, 2: 1800125.10.1002/adts.201800125 ↗
53. FC Su. Flexible switching pressure sensors with fast response and less bending-sensitive performance applied to pain-perception-mimetic gloves. 2023, 15: 56328-56336.10.1021/acsami.3c13930 ↗
54. M Hamedi. A review of electrical contact resistance modeling in resistance spot welding. 2017, 61: 269-290.10.1007/s40194-016-0419-4 ↗
55. L Gao. All paper-based flexible and wearable piezoresistive pressure sensor. 2019, 11: 25034-25042.10.1021/acsami.9b07465 ↗
56. Y Huang. Emerging technologies of flexible pressure sensors: Materials, modeling, devices, and manufacturing. 2019, 29: 1808509.10.1002/adfm.201808509 ↗
57. YL Hu HL Ma. Progress on piezoresistive strain sensors for flexible nanocomposites. 2022, 39: 1–22.10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210729.004 ↗
58. DJ Cohen. A highly elastic, capacitive strain gauge based on percolating nanotube networks. 2012, 12: 1821-1825.10.1021/nl204052z ↗
59. J Kong. Simple and rapid micropatterning of conductive carbon composites and its application to elastic strain sensors. 2014, 77: 199-207.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.022 ↗
60. RK Kramer. Masked deposition of gallium–indium alloys for liquid-embedded elastomer conductors. 2013, 23: 5292-5296.10.1002/adfm.201203589 ↗
61. CL Choong. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. 2014, 26: 3451-3458.10.1002/adma.201305182 ↗
62. LJ Hou. Flexible pressure sensor design and fabrication based on micro-nano structure. 2022, 41: 73-76.10.13873/J.1000-9787(2022)07-0073-04 ↗
63. DY Zhao. Metal film flexible strain sensor based on microstructure. 2022, 59: 1049-1057.10.13250/j.cnki.wndz.2022.10.011 ↗
64. J Park. Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins. 2014, 8: 4689-4697.10.1021/nn500441k ↗
65. B Wei. A high-performance flexible piezoresistive sensor based on a nanocellulose/carbon-nanotube/polyvinyl-alcohol composite with a wrinkled microstructure. 2022, 22: 15834-15843.10.1109/JSEN.2022.3189053 ↗
66. JF Yan. Flexible and high sensitivity piezoresistive sensor based on mxene composite with wrinkle structure. 2020, 46: 23592-23598.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.131 ↗
67. YM Li. Graphene/PDMS biomimetic ginkgo leaf microstructure flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor. 2020, 57: 198-203.10.13250/j.cnki.wndz.2020.03.005 ↗
68. H Tang. Piezoresistive electronic skin based on diverse bionic microstructure. 2021, 318: 112532.10.1016/j.sna.2020.112532 ↗
69. P Nie. High-performance piezoresistive electronic skin with bionic hierarchical microstructure and microcracks. 2017, 9: 14911-14919.10.1021/acsami.7b01979 ↗
70. YF Cheng. Bioinspired microspines for a high-performance spray Ti 3C 2T x MXene-based piezoresistive sensor. 2020, 14: 2145-2155.10.1021/acsnano.9b08952 ↗
71. HW Liu. Ambilateral convergent directional freeze casting meta-structured foams with a negative Poisson’s ratio for high-performance piezoresistive sensors. 2023, 454: 140436.10.1016/j.cej.2022.140436 ↗
72. C Du. An in situ polymerized polypyrrole/halloysite nanotube–silver nanoflower based flexible wearable pressure sensor with a large measurement range and high sensitivity. 2021, 9: 13172-13181.10.1039/D1TC03135J ↗
73. NQ Luo. Hollow-structured graphene-silicone-composite-based piezoresistive sensors: Decoupled property tuning and bending reliability. 2017, 29: 1702675.10.1002/adma.201702675 ↗
74. LX Lv. Ultrasensitive pressure sensor based on an ultralight sparkling graphene block. 2017, 9: 22885-22892.10.1021/acsami.7b07153 ↗
75. JL Xiao. A flyweight and superelastic graphene aerogel as a high-capacity adsorbent and highly sensitive pressure sensor. 2018, 6: 9074-9080.10.1039/C7TA11348J ↗
76. RS Dahiya. Tactile sensing—From humans to humanoids. 2010, 26: 1-20.10.1109/TRO.2009.2033627 ↗
77. MEH Eltaib. Tactile sensing technology for minimal access surgery—A review. 2003, 13: 1163-1177.10.1016/S0957-4158(03)00048-5 ↗
78. BO Sakieva. Practice and application of hierarchical analysis. 2019, 80: 544-549.10.15863/TAS.2019.12.80.102 ↗
79. G Ge. A flexible pressure sensor based on rGO/polyaniline wrapped sponge with tunable sensitivity for human motion detection. 2018, 10: 10033-10040.10.1039/C8NR02813C ↗
80. ZH Wang. Flexible hemispheric microarrays of highly pressure-sensitive sensors based on breath figure method. 2018, 10: 10691–10698.10.1039/C8NR01495G ↗
81. YJ Fu. Effect of UV-ozone treatment on poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: Surface characterization and gas separation performance. 2010, 26: 4392-4399.10.1021/la903445x ↗
82. GH Yu. A wearable pressure sensor based on ultra-violet/ozone microstructured carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane arrays for electronic skins. 2018, 29: 115502.10.1088/1361-6528/aaa855 ↗
83. WF Chen. Flexible pressure sensors with a wide detection range based on self-assembled polystyrene microspheres. 2019, 19: 5194.10.3390/s19235194 ↗
84. MD Xu. Flexible pressure sensor using carbon nanotube-wrapped polydimethylsiloxane microspheres for tactile sensing. 2018, 284: 260-265.10.1016/j.sna.2018.10.040 ↗
85. E Roh. A solution-processable, omnidirectionally stretchable, and high-pressure-sensitive piezoresistive device. 2017, 29: 1703004.10.1002/adma.201703004 ↗
86. Q Tian. Bean pod-inspired ultrasensitive and self-healing pressure sensor based on laser-induced graphene and polystyrene microsphere sandwiched structure. 2020, 12: 9710-9717.10.1021/acsami.9b18873 ↗
87. BW Zhu. Microstructured graphene arrays for highly sensitive flexible tactile sensors. 2014, 10: 3625-3631.10.1002/smll.201401207 ↗
88. A Smith. Three-dimensional printed embedded channel-based resistive strain sensor: Fabrication and experimental characterization. 2019, 30: 1518-1526.10.1177/1045389X19835961 ↗
89. T Zhang. Flexible pressure sensors with wide linearity range and high sensitivity based on selective laser sintering 3D printing. 2019, 4: 1900679.10.1002/admt.201900679 ↗
90. RM Dirkzwager. Development of aptamer-based point-of-care diagnostic devices for malaria using three-dimensional printing rapid prototyping. 2016, 1: 420-426.10.1021/acssensors.5b00175 ↗
91. XY Yin. Monolithic dual-material 3D printing of ionic skins with long‐term performance stability. 2019, 29: 1904716.10.1002/adfm.201904716 ↗
92. LY Zhou. All-printed flexible and stretchable electronics with pressing or freezing activatable liquid-metal-silicone inks. 2020, 30: 1906683.10.1002/adfm.201906683 ↗
93. SH Peng. Rational design of ultrasensitive pressure sensors by tailoring microscopic features. 2018, 5: 1800403.10.1002/admi.201800403 ↗
94. A Dos Santos. Piezoresistive E-skin sensors produced with laser engraved molds. 2018, 4: 1800182.10.1002/aelm.201800182 ↗
95. ZY Yang. Poly(vinylalcohol)/chitosan-based high-strength, fire-retardant and smoke-suppressant composite aerogels incorporating aluminum species via freeze drying. 2021, 219: 108919.10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108919 ↗
96. XM Zhang. Fabrication and application of new polymer-based materials by freeze-drying. 2014, 26: 1832-1839.10.7536/PC140723 ↗
97. YN Ma. 3D synergistical MXene/reduced graphene oxide aerogel for a piezoresistive sensor. 2018, 12: 3209–3216.10.1021/acsnano.7b06909 ↗
98. S Wang. Flexible pressure sensors with ultrahigh stress tolerance enabled by periodic microslits. 2024, 10: 24.10.1038/s41378-023-00639-4 ↗