journal article·2025-06Open access

3D-printed polyurea-toughened Al 2O 3 cellular ceramic structures: Bioinspired dual-phase interpenetrating design for superior mechanical properties

Xueqin Zhang, Ruyue Su, Xiong Gao, Jingyi Chen, Rujie He

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Cellular ceramic structures (CCSs) are promising candidates for structural components due to their low density and superior load-bearing capacity. However, the brittleness and poor energy-absorbing ability of CCSs severely limit their applications. Inspired by composites in natural materials, whose stiff and tough constituents are arranged in a dual-phase interpenetrating architecture, we proposed a dual-phase interpenetrating architecture to achieve superior strength and toughness of CCSs simultaneously. Polyurea-toughened Al2O3 CCSs (P/CCSs) were fabricated via three-dimensional (3D) printing and infiltration. Effects of structural configuration and relative density on mechanical properties of P/CCSs under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loading were systematically discussed. It was demonstrated that polyurea effectively improved the mechanical properties of CCSs. Load-bearing capacity and energy-absorbing ability of P/CCSs under quasi-static compressive loading were 1.22–3.64 and 57–519 times those of CCSs. Additionally, dynamic compressive strength and energy absorption of P/CCSs were 1.07–1.85 and 3.31–10.94 times those of CCSs. Furthermore, due to the incorporation of polyurea, P/CCSs maintained structural integrity under large deformation, rather than undergoing catastrophic fracture. This work provides an effective solution to mitigate the adverse effect of ceramic brittleness, rendering P/CCSs promising candidates for structural components that require superior load-bearing capacity and energy-absorbing ability simultaneously.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. XQ Zhang. Additive manufacturing of cellular ceramic structures: From structure to structure–function integration. 2022, 215: 110470.10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110470 ↗
2. W Zheng. Influence of Al 2O 3 content on mechanical properties of silica-based ceramic cores prepared by stereolithography. 2021, 10: 1381-1388.10.1007/s40145-021-0513-y ↗
3. YH Lee. Dual-scale porous biphasic calcium phosphate gyroid scaffolds using ceramic suspensions containing polymer microsphere porogen for digital light processing. 2021, 47: 11285-11293.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.254 ↗
4. XQ Zhang. Mechanical properties of additively-manufactured cellular ceramic structures: A comprehensive study. 2022, 11: 1918-1931.10.1007/s40145-022-0656-5 ↗
5. XY Liu. The preparation of ZrO 2–Al 2O 3 composite ceramic by SLA-3D printing and sintering processing. 2020, 46: 937-944.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.054 ↗
6. LZ Zhang. 3D printing of hollow lattice structures of ZrO 2(3Y)/Al 2O 3 ceramics by vat photopolymerization: Process optimization, microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. 2022, 83: 756-767.10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.047 ↗
7. L Zhang. Pseudo-ductile fracture of 3D printed alumina triply periodic minimal surface structures. 2020, 40: 408-416.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.09.048 ↗
8. HS Tian. Fabrication of advanced bioinspired anisotropic carbide ceramic composites: Past, recent progress, and future perspectives. 2024, 13: 1713-1736.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220974 ↗
9. YY Liu. Bioinspired interpenetrating-phase metal composites. 2024, 144: 101281.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101281 ↗
10. N Zhang. On the damage tolerance of bioinspired gradient composites with nacre-like architecture. 2025, 35: 2421057.10.1002/adfm.202421057 ↗
11. F Barthelat. On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure. 2007, 55: 306-337.10.1016/j.jmps.2006.07.007 ↗
12. XW Su. Tissue regeneration in the shell of the giant queen conch, Strombus gigas. 2004, 16: 581-593.10.1021/cm030573l ↗
13. F Bouville. Strong, tough and stiff bioinspired ceramics from brittle constituents. 2014, 13: 508-514.10.1038/nmat3915 ↗
14. E Munch. Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. 2008, 322: 1516-1520.10.1126/science.1164865 ↗
15. M Li. Conch-shell-inspired tough ceramic. 2022, 32: 2205309.10.1002/adfm.202205309 ↗
16. ZA Jia. 3D printing of biomimetic composites with improved fracture toughness. 2019, 173: 61-73.10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.052 ↗
17. XQ Zhang. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical properties of additively manufactured Al 2O 3 ceramic lattice structures: Effects of structural configuration. 2022, 17: 528-542.10.1080/17452759.2022.2048340 ↗
18. XQ Zhang. Additive manufacturing, quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviours of ceramic lattice structures. 2022, 42: 7102-7112.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.08.018 ↗
19. QM Li. Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. 2006, 42: 371-392.10.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
20. FN Habib. Fabrication of polymeric lattice structures for optimum energy absorption using Multi Jet Fusion technology. 2018, 155: 86-98.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.059 ↗
21. ZP Sun. Characterisation and modeling of additively-manufactured polymeric hybrid lattice structures for energy absorption. 2021, 191: 106101.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106101 ↗
22. XQ Zhang. 3D-printed bioinspired Al 2O 3/polyurea dual-phase architecture with high robustness, energy absorption, and cyclic life. 2023, 463: 142378.10.1016/j.cej.2023.142378 ↗
23. JH Park. Compressive behavior of soft lattice structures and their application to functional compliance control. 2020, 33: 101148.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101148 ↗
24. ZB Ma. Lattice structures of Cu–Cr–Zr copper alloy by selective laser melting: Microstructures, mechanical properties and energy absorption. 2020, 187: 108406.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108406 ↗
25. M Yaseer Omar. Syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich composite: Compressive properties and strain rate effects. 2015, 643: 156-168.10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.033 ↗
26. MH Shen. Mechanical properties of 3D printed ceramic cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures. 2021, 41: 1481-1489.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.062 ↗
27. NR Brodnik. Analysis of multi-scale mechanical properties of ceramic trusses prepared from preceramic polymers. 2020, 31: 100957.10.1016/j.addma.2019.100957 ↗
28. H Mei. Structure design influencing the mechanical performance of 3D printing porous ceramics. 2021, 47: 8389-8397.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.203 ↗
29. T Minasyan. Additively manufactured mesostructured MoSi 2–Si 3N 4 ceramic lattice. 2019, 45: 9926-9933.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.035 ↗
30. M Leary. Inconel 625 lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM): Mechanical properties, deformation and failure modes. 2018, 157: 179-199.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
31. L Dong. Mechanical response of Ti–6Al–4V hierarchical architected metamaterials. 2019, 175: 90-106.10.1016/j.actamat.2019.06.004 ↗
32. YJ Liu. Early plastic deformation behaviour and energy absorption in porous β-type biomedical titanium produced by selective laser melting. 2018, 153: 99-103.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.010 ↗
33. DSJ Al-Saedi. Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. 2018, 144: 32-44.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.059 ↗
34. L Yang. Mechanical response of a triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures manufactured by selective laser melting. 2018, 148: 149-157.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.039 ↗
35. M Keshavarzan. Investigation on the failure mechanism of triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures fabricated by Vat photopolymerization additive manufacturing under compressive loadings. 2020, 140: 103150.10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103150 ↗
36. C Ling. Mechanical behaviour of additively-manufactured polymeric octet-truss lattice structures under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loading. 2019, 162: 106-118.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.035 ↗
37. H Jiang. Mechanical properties of 3D printed architected polymer foams under large deformation. 2020, 194: 108946.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108946 ↗
38. WF Liu. Maximizing mechanical properties and minimizing support material of PolyJet fabricated 3D lattice structures. 2020, 35: 101257.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101257 ↗
39. JJ Lu. Quasi-static compressive and cyclic dynamic impact performances of vat photopolymerization 3D printed Al 2O 3 triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds and Al 2O 3/Al hybrid structures: Effects of cell size. 2023, 969: 172445.10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172445 ↗
40. B Zhang. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured Al 2O 3 ceramic plate-lattice structures: Experiments & Simulations. 2023, 311: 116792.10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116792 ↗
41. X Li. Compressive behavior of selective laser melting printed Gyroid structures under dynamic loading. 2021, 46: 102054.10.1016/j.addma.2021.102054 ↗
42. N Novak. Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures. 2021, 266: 113801.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113801 ↗
43. N Jin. Failure and energy absorption characteristics of four lattice structures under dynamic loading. 2019, 169: 107655.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107655 ↗
44. XF Cao. Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure. 2020, 148: 106586.10.1016/j.tws.2019.106586 ↗
45. F Habib. Design and evaluation of 3D printed polymeric cellular materials for dynamic energy absorption. 2019, 103: 2347-2361.10.1007/s00170-019-03541-4 ↗
46. S Li. Compressive properties and collapse behavior of additively-manufactured layered-hybrid lattice structures under static and dynamic loadings. 2020, 157: 107153.10.1016/j.tws.2020.107153 ↗