High-sensitivity piezoelectric response enabled by heterogeneous stress–electric field distribution in 3D interconnected porous ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Porous piezoceramics are attractive for high-sensitivity sensing and energy conversion due to their low density, reduced dielectric constant (εr), and good mechanical compliance. However, increasing porosity is often accompanied by a significant reduction in the piezoelectric charge coefficient (d33), creating an intrinsic trade-off that limits the practical use of porous structures in high-sensitivity piezoelectric devices and leaves their overall performance advantages under debate. In this work, we overcome this challenge by developing a fully open-cell, three-dimensionally interconnected Pb(Zr1/2Ti1/2)O3–Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3 (PZT–PZN–PNN, PZNNT) porous piezoceramic (3D-PPC). Despite an ultrahigh porosity of 92%, the material maintains a high d33 of approximately 470 pC/N, approximately 90% of that of the dense ceramic. The effective εr is reduced to approximately 140 (a 94% decrease), leading to an approximately 14-fold enhancement in the piezoelectric voltage coefficient g33 (approximately 380×10−3 Vm/N). Combined microstructural characterization, domain analysis, defect studies, and multiphysics simulations show that the exceptional performance arises from synergistic effects of heterogeneous stress and electric fields, multiscale domain structures, and defect-mediated regulation within the three-dimensionally interconnected porous architecture. Finally, the material generates peak output voltages up to 200 V under subtle mechanical excitation and achieves an ultrahigh sensitivity of 38.7 V/kPa. These results show that three-dimensionally interconnected porous architectures are not merely passive means of reducing dielectric permittivity but also active structural strategies for tuning local fields and polarization behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. XL Cao. Piezoelectric nanogenerators derived self-powered sensors for multifunctional applications and artificial intelligence. 2021, 31: 2102983.10.1002/adfm.202102983 ↗
2. HW Lu. Performance enhancement of nanogenerator achieved in branch-heterostructure piezoelectric ceramic fiber toward electrical transmission power line monitoring. 2025, 14: 9221171.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221171 ↗
3. MY Xie. Flexible and active self-powered pressure, shear sensors based on freeze casting ceramic–polymer composites. 2018, 11: 2919-2927.10.1039/C8EE01551A ↗
4. LL Li. Recent progress on piezoelectric energy harvesting: Structures and materials. 2018, 1: 478-505.10.1007/s42114-018-0046-1 ↗
5. CX Zhu. Ultra-high energy harvester performance in KNN-based textured piezoceramics via multiscale reconfiguration design. 2025, 14: 9221167.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221167 ↗
6. SD Mahapatra. Piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting and sensing applications: Roadmap for future smart materials. 2021, 8: 2100864.10.1002/advs.202100864 ↗
7. X Pan. Mechanical energy harvesting based on the piezoelectric materials: Recent advances and future perspectives. 2024, 497: 154249.10.1016/j.cej.2024.154249 ↗
8. XY Chen. Simultaneous enhancement of piezoelectric performance and Curie temperature in high-temperature Bi 4 Ti 3 O 12 piezoceramics through A/B site co-doping. 2025, 14: 9221077.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221077 ↗
9. H Rocha. Sensors for process and structural health monitoring of aerospace composites: A review. 2021, 237: 112231.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
10. M Chen. Stabilization mechanism of antiferroelectric Pnma phase and low-field reversible phase transition in sodium niobate-based ceramics. 2025, 14: 9221170.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221170 ↗
11. Q Wu. A lead-free KNN-based, co-fired multilayered piezoceramic energy harvester with a high output current and power. 2025, 11: 100876.10.1016/j.jmat.2024.04.003 ↗
12. K Zhao. Tailored ceramic–metal piezocomposite energy harvester with high current output by controlling the electrical impedance. 2022, 4: 3679-3685.10.1021/acsaelm.2c00634 ↗
13. XY Xu. Phase structure and electrical properties of 0.28PIN–0.32PZN–(0.4− x )PT– x PZ piezoelectric ceramics. 2023, 13: 1362-1374.10.3390/cryst13091362 ↗
14. XY Feng. Effect of sintering atmosphere on the microstructure and electrical properties of Pb(Zr 1/2 Ti 1/2 )O 3 –Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 ceramics. 2022, 33: 11613-11622.10.1007/s10854-022-08133-9 ↗
15. SJ Zhang. Electromechanical properties of PMN–PZT piezoelectric single crystals near morphotropic phase boundary compositions. 2007, 90: 3859-3862.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02004.x ↗
16. XZ Li. Growth and piezo-/ferroelectric properties of PIN–PMN–PT single crystals. 2012, 111: 034105.10.1063/1.3681290 ↗
17. XY Feng. Microstructure evolution and properties of textured, Pb(Zr 1/2 Ti 1/2 )O 3 –Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 ceramics with plate-like BaZr 0.1 Ti 0.9 O 3 template. 2024, 1002: 175439.10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175439 ↗
18. FZ Li. Sintering densification driven by orientation fluctuation in textured BaTiO 3 ceramics with abnormal comprehensive ferroelectric properties. 2025, 14: 9221126.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221126 ↗
19. SUH Bakhtiar. Innovative perspectives on porous ferroelectric ceramics and their composites: Charting new frontiers in energy applications. 2024, 38: 108388.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108388 ↗
20. MY Yan. Porous ferroelectric materials for energy technologies: Current status and future perspectives. 2021, 14: 6158-6190.10.1039/D1EE03025F ↗
21. LF Du. Effect of closed pores on dielectric properties of 0.8Na 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3 –0.2K 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3 porous ceramics. 2018, 38: 2767-2773.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.02.011 ↗
22. Y Zhang. Enhanced pyroelectric and piezoelectric properties of PZT with aligned porosity for energy harvesting applications. 2017, 5: 6569-6580.10.1039/C7TA00967D ↗
23. YY Li. Direct ink writing of three-dimensional (K,Na)NbO 3 -based piezoelectric ceramics. 2015, 8: 1729-1737.10.3390/ma8041729 ↗
24. F Gheorghiu. Porosity-dependent properties of Nb-doped Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 ceramics. 2017, 100: 647-658.10.1111/jace.14587 ↗
25. HY Xue. Multilevel structure engineered lead-free piezoceramics enabling breakthrough in energy harvesting performance for bioelectronics. 2023, 33: 2212110.10.1002/adfm.202212110 ↗
26. Y Zhang. Piezoelectric performance of PZT-based materials with aligned porosity: Experiment and modelling. 2019, 28: 125021.10.1088/1361-665X/ab5018 ↗
27. JQ Luo. Porous flexible molecular-based piezoelectric composite achieves milliwatt output power density. 2024, 15: 8636.10.1038/s41467-024-53031-9 ↗
28. null10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.048 ↗
29. H Kim. Fabrication of bulk piezoelectric and dielectric BaTiO 3 ceramics using paste extrusion 3D printing technique. 2019, 102: 3685-3694.10.1111/jace.16242 ↗
30. GZ Zhang. Flexible three-dimensional interconnected piezoelectric ceramic foam based composites for highly efficient concurrent mechanical and thermal energy harvesting. 2018, 11: 2046-2056.10.1039/C8EE00595H ↗
31. H Li. Porous cordierite ceramics prepared by foam-gelcasting technique: Phase evolution and properties. 2019, 791: 690-699.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.225 ↗
32. YQ Shao. Low sintering shrinkage and high strength of porous mullite–zirconia ceramics: Effect of AlF 3 and ZrSi 2 contents. 2025, 108: 20243.10.1111/jace.20243 ↗
33. LL Li. Effect of MnO 2 on the microstructure and electrical properties of 0.83Pb(Zr 0.5 Ti 0.5 )O 3 –0.11Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –0.06Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 piezoelectric ceramics. 2020, 46: 180-185.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.246 ↗
34. XY Feng. Enhanced piezoelectric energy harvesting performance of PZT–PZN–PNN piezoceramic via microstructure texturing strategy. 2025, 51: 52900-52909.10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.09.047 ↗
35. XL Yu. Multiscale heterogeneity strategy in piezoceramics for enhanced energy harvesting performances. 2021, 13: 17800-17808.10.1021/acsami.1c01409 ↗
36. WL Huo. Ceramic particle-stabilized foams/emulsions with UV light response and further synthesis of ceramic capsules. 2019, 360: 1459-1467.10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.172 ↗
37. R Theissmann. Nanodomains in morphotropic lead zirconate titanate ceramics: On the origin of the strong piezoelectric effect. 2007, 102: 024111.10.1063/1.2753569 ↗
38. XL Yu. Boosting output current density of piezoceramic energy harvesters using three-dimensional embedded electrodes. 2022, 101: 107598.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107598 ↗
39. L Daniel. A multiscale modelling analysis of the contribution of crystalline elastic anisotropy to intergranular stresses in ferroelectric materials. 2014, 47: 325303.10.1088/0022-3727/47/32/325303 ↗
40. ZH Li. Porous structure enhances the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient and electromechanical coupling coefficient of lead-free (Ba 0.85 Ca 0.15 )(Zr 0.1 Ti 0.9 )O 3 . 2024, 11: 2406255.10.1002/advs.202406255 ↗
41. SJ Zhang. Sintering effect on microstructure and properties of (K,Na)NbO 3 Ceramics. 2011, 94: 3659-3665.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04833.x ↗
42. K Uchino. Critical exponents of the dielectric constants in diffused-phase-transition crystals. 1982, 44: 55-61.10.1080/00150198208260644 ↗
43. YJ Hao. Flexible piezoelectric energy harvester with an ultrahigh transduction coefficient by the interconnected skeleton design strategy. 2020, 12: 13001-13009.10.1039/D0NR03056B ↗
44. X Gao. Ultrahigh sensitive flexible sensor based on textured piezoelectric composites for preventing sports injuries. 2022, 229: 109693.10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109693 ↗
45. MY Yan. Flexible pillar-base structured piezocomposite with aligned porosity for piezoelectric energy harvesting. 2021, 88: 106278.10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106278 ↗
46. MY Yan. Enhanced energy harvesting performance in lead-free multi-layer piezoelectric composites with a highly aligned pore structure. 2023, 106: 108096.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108096 ↗
47. AK Yang. Microstructure and electrical properties of porous PZT ceramics fabricated by different methods. 2010, 93: 1984-1990.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03684.x ↗
48. JI Roscow. Manufacture and characterization of porous ferroelectrics for piezoelectric energy harvesting applications. 2016, 498: 40-46.10.1080/00150193.2016.1169154 ↗
49. QQ Xu. Construction of flexible piezoceramic array with ultrahigh piezoelectricity via a hierarchical design strategy. 2023, 33: 2304402.10.1002/adfm.202304402 ↗
50. BA Tuttle. Robocast Pb(Zr 0.95 Ti 0.05 )O 3 ceramic monoliths and composites. 2001, 84: 872-874.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00756.x ↗
51. J Xu. Low sintering shrinkage porous ceramics: Principles, progress, and perspectives. 2025, 14: 9221015.10.26599/JAC.2024.9221015 ↗
52. RC Lewis. Microstructural modelling of the polarization and properties of porous ferroelectrics. 2011, 20: 085002.10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085002 ↗
53. C Baek. A flexible energy harvester based on a lead-free and piezoelectric BCTZ nanoparticle–polymer composite. 2016, 8: 17632-17638.10.1039/C6NR05784E ↗
54. JJ Ye. Piezoelectric ceramics with hierarchical macro- and micro-pore channels for sensing applications. 2024, 79: 103915.10.1016/j.addma.2023.103915 ↗