journal article·2026-05Open access

High-sensitivity piezoelectric response enabled by heterogeneous stress–electric field distribution in 3D interconnected porous ceramics

Xiaoying Feng, Jie Xu, Kena Zhang, Chenhe Xia, Xin Gao, Mupeng Zheng, Yudong Hou, Feng Gao, Shujun Zhang

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Porous piezoceramics are attractive for high-sensitivity sensing and energy conversion due to their low density, reduced dielectric constant (εr), and good mechanical compliance. However, increasing porosity is often accompanied by a significant reduction in the piezoelectric charge coefficient (d33), creating an intrinsic trade-off that limits the practical use of porous structures in high-sensitivity piezoelectric devices and leaves their overall performance advantages under debate. In this work, we overcome this challenge by developing a fully open-cell, three-dimensionally interconnected Pb(Zr1/2Ti1/2)O3–Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3 (PZT–PZN–PNN, PZNNT) porous piezoceramic (3D-PPC). Despite an ultrahigh porosity of 92%, the material maintains a high d33 of approximately 470 pC/N, approximately 90% of that of the dense ceramic. The effective εr is reduced to approximately 140 (a 94% decrease), leading to an approximately 14-fold enhancement in the piezoelectric voltage coefficient g33 (approximately 380×10−3 Vm/N). Combined microstructural characterization, domain analysis, defect studies, and multiphysics simulations show that the exceptional performance arises from synergistic effects of heterogeneous stress and electric fields, multiscale domain structures, and defect-mediated regulation within the three-dimensionally interconnected porous architecture. Finally, the material generates peak output voltages up to 200 V under subtle mechanical excitation and achieves an ultrahigh sensitivity of 38.7 V/kPa. These results show that three-dimensionally interconnected porous architectures are not merely passive means of reducing dielectric permittivity but also active structural strategies for tuning local fields and polarization behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. XL Cao. Piezoelectric nanogenerators derived self-powered sensors for multifunctional applications and artificial intelligence. 2021, 31: 2102983.10.1002/adfm.202102983 ↗
2. HW Lu. Performance enhancement of nanogenerator achieved in branch-heterostructure piezoelectric ceramic fiber toward electrical transmission power line monitoring. 2025, 14: 9221171.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221171 ↗
3. MY Xie. Flexible and active self-powered pressure, shear sensors based on freeze casting ceramic–polymer composites. 2018, 11: 2919-2927.10.1039/C8EE01551A ↗
4. LL Li. Recent progress on piezoelectric energy harvesting: Structures and materials. 2018, 1: 478-505.10.1007/s42114-018-0046-1 ↗
5. CX Zhu. Ultra-high energy harvester performance in KNN-based textured piezoceramics via multiscale reconfiguration design. 2025, 14: 9221167.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221167 ↗
6. SD Mahapatra. Piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting and sensing applications: Roadmap for future smart materials. 2021, 8: 2100864.10.1002/advs.202100864 ↗
7. X Pan. Mechanical energy harvesting based on the piezoelectric materials: Recent advances and future perspectives. 2024, 497: 154249.10.1016/j.cej.2024.154249 ↗
8. XY Chen. Simultaneous enhancement of piezoelectric performance and Curie temperature in high-temperature Bi 4 Ti 3 O 12 piezoceramics through A/B site co-doping. 2025, 14: 9221077.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221077 ↗
9. H Rocha. Sensors for process and structural health monitoring of aerospace composites: A review. 2021, 237: 112231.10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
10. M Chen. Stabilization mechanism of antiferroelectric Pnma phase and low-field reversible phase transition in sodium niobate-based ceramics. 2025, 14: 9221170.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221170 ↗
11. Q Wu. A lead-free KNN-based, co-fired multilayered piezoceramic energy harvester with a high output current and power. 2025, 11: 100876.10.1016/j.jmat.2024.04.003 ↗
12. K Zhao. Tailored ceramic–metal piezocomposite energy harvester with high current output by controlling the electrical impedance. 2022, 4: 3679-3685.10.1021/acsaelm.2c00634 ↗
13. XY Xu. Phase structure and electrical properties of 0.28PIN–0.32PZN–(0.4− x )PT– x PZ piezoelectric ceramics. 2023, 13: 1362-1374.10.3390/cryst13091362 ↗
14. XY Feng. Effect of sintering atmosphere on the microstructure and electrical properties of Pb(Zr 1/2 Ti 1/2 )O 3 –Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 ceramics. 2022, 33: 11613-11622.10.1007/s10854-022-08133-9 ↗
15. SJ Zhang. Electromechanical properties of PMN–PZT piezoelectric single crystals near morphotropic phase boundary compositions. 2007, 90: 3859-3862.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02004.x ↗
16. XZ Li. Growth and piezo-/ferroelectric properties of PIN–PMN–PT single crystals. 2012, 111: 034105.10.1063/1.3681290 ↗
17. XY Feng. Microstructure evolution and properties of textured, Pb(Zr 1/2 Ti 1/2 )O 3 –Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 ceramics with plate-like BaZr 0.1 Ti 0.9 O 3 template. 2024, 1002: 175439.10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175439 ↗
18. FZ Li. Sintering densification driven by orientation fluctuation in textured BaTiO 3 ceramics with abnormal comprehensive ferroelectric properties. 2025, 14: 9221126.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221126 ↗
19. SUH Bakhtiar. Innovative perspectives on porous ferroelectric ceramics and their composites: Charting new frontiers in energy applications. 2024, 38: 108388.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108388 ↗
20. MY Yan. Porous ferroelectric materials for energy technologies: Current status and future perspectives. 2021, 14: 6158-6190.10.1039/D1EE03025F ↗
21. LF Du. Effect of closed pores on dielectric properties of 0.8Na 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3 –0.2K 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3 porous ceramics. 2018, 38: 2767-2773.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.02.011 ↗
22. Y Zhang. Enhanced pyroelectric and piezoelectric properties of PZT with aligned porosity for energy harvesting applications. 2017, 5: 6569-6580.10.1039/C7TA00967D ↗
23. YY Li. Direct ink writing of three-dimensional (K,Na)NbO 3 -based piezoelectric ceramics. 2015, 8: 1729-1737.10.3390/ma8041729 ↗
24. F Gheorghiu. Porosity-dependent properties of Nb-doped Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 ceramics. 2017, 100: 647-658.10.1111/jace.14587 ↗
25. HY Xue. Multilevel structure engineered lead-free piezoceramics enabling breakthrough in energy harvesting performance for bioelectronics. 2023, 33: 2212110.10.1002/adfm.202212110 ↗
26. Y Zhang. Piezoelectric performance of PZT-based materials with aligned porosity: Experiment and modelling. 2019, 28: 125021.10.1088/1361-665X/ab5018 ↗
27. JQ Luo. Porous flexible molecular-based piezoelectric composite achieves milliwatt output power density. 2024, 15: 8636.10.1038/s41467-024-53031-9 ↗
29. H Kim. Fabrication of bulk piezoelectric and dielectric BaTiO 3 ceramics using paste extrusion 3D printing technique. 2019, 102: 3685-3694.10.1111/jace.16242 ↗
30. GZ Zhang. Flexible three-dimensional interconnected piezoelectric ceramic foam based composites for highly efficient concurrent mechanical and thermal energy harvesting. 2018, 11: 2046-2056.10.1039/C8EE00595H ↗
31. H Li. Porous cordierite ceramics prepared by foam-gelcasting technique: Phase evolution and properties. 2019, 791: 690-699.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.225 ↗
32. YQ Shao. Low sintering shrinkage and high strength of porous mullite–zirconia ceramics: Effect of AlF 3 and ZrSi 2 contents. 2025, 108: 20243.10.1111/jace.20243 ↗
33. LL Li. Effect of MnO 2 on the microstructure and electrical properties of 0.83Pb(Zr 0.5 Ti 0.5 )O 3 –0.11Pb(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –0.06Pb(Ni 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 piezoelectric ceramics. 2020, 46: 180-185.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.246 ↗
34. XY Feng. Enhanced piezoelectric energy harvesting performance of PZT–PZN–PNN piezoceramic via microstructure texturing strategy. 2025, 51: 52900-52909.10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.09.047 ↗
35. XL Yu. Multiscale heterogeneity strategy in piezoceramics for enhanced energy harvesting performances. 2021, 13: 17800-17808.10.1021/acsami.1c01409 ↗
36. WL Huo. Ceramic particle-stabilized foams/emulsions with UV light response and further synthesis of ceramic capsules. 2019, 360: 1459-1467.10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.172 ↗
37. R Theissmann. Nanodomains in morphotropic lead zirconate titanate ceramics: On the origin of the strong piezoelectric effect. 2007, 102: 024111.10.1063/1.2753569 ↗
38. XL Yu. Boosting output current density of piezoceramic energy harvesters using three-dimensional embedded electrodes. 2022, 101: 107598.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107598 ↗
39. L Daniel. A multiscale modelling analysis of the contribution of crystalline elastic anisotropy to intergranular stresses in ferroelectric materials. 2014, 47: 325303.10.1088/0022-3727/47/32/325303 ↗
40. ZH Li. Porous structure enhances the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient and electromechanical coupling coefficient of lead-free (Ba 0.85 Ca 0.15 )(Zr 0.1 Ti 0.9 )O 3 . 2024, 11: 2406255.10.1002/advs.202406255 ↗
41. SJ Zhang. Sintering effect on microstructure and properties of (K,Na)NbO 3 Ceramics. 2011, 94: 3659-3665.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04833.x ↗
42. K Uchino. Critical exponents of the dielectric constants in diffused-phase-transition crystals. 1982, 44: 55-61.10.1080/00150198208260644 ↗
43. YJ Hao. Flexible piezoelectric energy harvester with an ultrahigh transduction coefficient by the interconnected skeleton design strategy. 2020, 12: 13001-13009.10.1039/D0NR03056B ↗
44. X Gao. Ultrahigh sensitive flexible sensor based on textured piezoelectric composites for preventing sports injuries. 2022, 229: 109693.10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109693 ↗
45. MY Yan. Flexible pillar-base structured piezocomposite with aligned porosity for piezoelectric energy harvesting. 2021, 88: 106278.10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106278 ↗
46. MY Yan. Enhanced energy harvesting performance in lead-free multi-layer piezoelectric composites with a highly aligned pore structure. 2023, 106: 108096.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108096 ↗
47. AK Yang. Microstructure and electrical properties of porous PZT ceramics fabricated by different methods. 2010, 93: 1984-1990.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03684.x ↗
48. JI Roscow. Manufacture and characterization of porous ferroelectrics for piezoelectric energy harvesting applications. 2016, 498: 40-46.10.1080/00150193.2016.1169154 ↗
49. QQ Xu. Construction of flexible piezoceramic array with ultrahigh piezoelectricity via a hierarchical design strategy. 2023, 33: 2304402.10.1002/adfm.202304402 ↗
50. BA Tuttle. Robocast Pb(Zr 0.95 Ti 0.05 )O 3 ceramic monoliths and composites. 2001, 84: 872-874.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00756.x ↗
51. J Xu. Low sintering shrinkage porous ceramics: Principles, progress, and perspectives. 2025, 14: 9221015.10.26599/JAC.2024.9221015 ↗
52. RC Lewis. Microstructural modelling of the polarization and properties of porous ferroelectrics. 2011, 20: 085002.10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085002 ↗
53. C Baek. A flexible energy harvester based on a lead-free and piezoelectric BCTZ nanoparticle–polymer composite. 2016, 8: 17632-17638.10.1039/C6NR05784E ↗
54. JJ Ye. Piezoelectric ceramics with hierarchical macro- and micro-pore channels for sensing applications. 2024, 79: 103915.10.1016/j.addma.2023.103915 ↗