Multi-element doped SrFeO 3 -based cathodes with balanced thermal expansion for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. F Zhang. Zn-ion ultrafluidity via bioinspired ion channel for ultralong lifespan Zn-ion battery. 2024, 11: nwae199.10.1093/nsr/nwae199 ↗
2. SJ Zhang. Three-dimensional macroscopic absorbents: From synergistic effects to advanced multifunctionalities. 2024, 17: 1952-1983.10.1007/s12274-023-6120-1 ↗
3. P Qiu. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H 2 O and CO 2 electrolysis: A review. 2023, 12: 1463-1510.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220767 ↗
4. JY Ye. Simple acid etched graphene oxide constructing high-performance sandwich structural hybrid membrane for redox flow battery. 2023, 35: 00550.10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00550 ↗
5. Y Zhang. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. 2021, 591: 246-251.10.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
6. R Zhou. Attempted preparation of La 0.5 Ba 0.5 MnO 3− δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 12: 1189-1200.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220748 ↗
7. JY Huang. Promotional role of BaCO 3 on the chromium—tolerance of La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3− δ cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 321: 122080.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122080 ↗
8. YQ Meng. Highly efficient La/Ni co-doped strontium titanate catalyst for co-production of propylene and hydrogen from propane in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. 2024, 354: 124111.10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124111 ↗
9. XY Li. Highly stable and efficient Pt single-atom catalyst for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2022, 316: 121627.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121627 ↗
10. M Chen. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3− δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. 2020, 8: 12566-12575.10.1039/D0TA03339A ↗
11. MY Zhou. Electrochemical performance and chemical stability of proton-conducting BaZr 0.8− x Ce x Y 0.2 O 3− δ electrolytes. 2022, 105: 5711-5724.10.1111/jace.18500 ↗
12. E Fabbri. Materials challenges toward proton-conducting oxide fuel cells: A critical review. 2010, 39: 4355-4369.10.1039/b902343g ↗
13. BY Yuan. Advances and challenges in high-performance cathodes for protonic solid oxide fuel cells and machine learning-guided perspectives. 2024, 122: 109306.10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109306 ↗
14. L Li. A series of bifunctional ReBaCo 2 O 5+ δ perovskite catalysts towards intermediate-temperature oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction. 2023, 468: 143762.10.1016/j.cej.2023.143762 ↗
15. YS Xu. A low-lewis-acid-strength cation Cs + -doped double perovskite for fast and durable oxygen reduction/evolutions on protonic ceramic cells. 2023, 8: 4145-4155.10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01722 ↗
16. HP Ding. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. 2020, 11: 1907.10.1038/s41467-020-15677-z ↗
17. YF Song. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. 2019, 3: 2842-2853.10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004 ↗
18. F Liu. Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to 450 °C. 2023, 8: 1145-1157.10.1038/s41560-023-01350-4 ↗
19. YR Yin. Unveiling the importance of the interface in nanocomposite cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 4: 20230082.10.1002/EXP.20230082 ↗
20. JA Kilner. Materials for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. 2014, 44: 365-393.10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113426 ↗
21. H Yamaura. Cathodic polarization of strontium-doped lanthanum ferrite in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell. 2005, 176: 269-274.10.1016/j.ssi.2004.08.008 ↗
22. Z Wang. Rational design of perovskite ferrites as high-performance proton-conducting fuel cell cathodes. 2022, 5: 777-787.10.1038/s41929-022-00829-9 ↗
23. YR Yin. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. 2023, 3: 697-708.10.1002/sus2.156 ↗
24. HL Dai. Manipulating Nb-doped SrFeO 3− δ with excellent performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 13: 579-589.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220880 ↗
25. N Wang. Machine-learning-accelerated development of efficient mixed protonic–electronic conducting oxides as the air electrodes for protonic ceramic cells. 2022, 34: 2203446.10.1002/adma.202203446 ↗
26. JT Gao. Cobalt-free fluorine doped Bi 0.7 Sr 0.3 FeO 3− δ oxides for energetic cathodes of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 452: 139584.10.1016/j.cej.2022.139584 ↗
27. YH Li. Revisiting Mo-doped SrFeO 3− δ perovskite: The origination of cathodic activity and longevity for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. 2025, 35: 2411025.10.1002/adfm.202411025 ↗
28. HL Dai. La 0.5− x Sc x Sr 0.5 MnO 3− δ cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Taking advantage of the secondary phase. 2024, 13: 1759-1770.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220972 ↗
29. Z Wang. Effective suppression of surface cation segregations on double perovskite oxides through entropy engineering. 2025, 43: 345-353.10.1016/j.jre.2024.07.017 ↗
30. LB Lei. A highly active hybrid catalyst modified (La 0.60 Sr 0.40 ) 0.95 Co 0.20 Fe 0.80 O 3− δ cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2018, 389: 1-7.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.058 ↗
31. YR Yin. Balancing intrinsic properties of cathode materials allows high performance for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2024, 4: e240.10.1002/sus2.240 ↗
32. YF Li. TiO 2 -induced electronic change in traditional La 0.5 Sr 0.5 MnO 3− δ cathode allows high performance of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 66: 3475-3483.10.1007/s40843-023-2519-9 ↗
33. HM Xiang. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. 2021, 10: 385-441.10.1007/s40145-021-0477-y ↗
34. Y Gao. A SrCo 0.9 Ta 0.1 O 3− δ derived medium-entropy cathode with superior CO 2 poisoning tolerance for solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 540: 231661.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231661 ↗
35. B Admasu Beshiwork. A defective iron-based perovskite cathode for high-performance IT-SOFCs: Tailoring the oxygen vacancies using Nb/Ta co-doping. 2024, 88: 306-316.10.1016/j.jechem.2023.09.015 ↗
36. XH Zhang. FeO 6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO 2 splitting. 2020, 142: 11540-11549.10.1021/jacs.0c04643 ↗
37. YR Yin. Successful preparation of BaCo 0.5 Fe 0.5 O 3– δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 12: 587-597.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220707 ↗
38. K Wang. Hydration and proton kinetics in Ce-doped Co-free perovskite for the triple-conducting cathode in solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 128: 4404-4413.10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c08256 ↗
39. RZ Ren. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2020, 3: 4914-4922.10.1021/acsaem.0c00486 ↗
40. B Liu. Novel mixed H + /e – /O 2– conducting cathode material PrBa 0.9 K 0.1 Fe 1.9 Zn 0.1 O 5+ δ for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 10: 17425-17433.10.1039/D2TA04457A ↗
41. CL Geng. A new in situ synthetic triple-conducting core–shell electrode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2021, 9: 11070-11079.10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02709 ↗
42. QQ Ji. The role of oxygen vacancies of ABO 3 perovskite oxides in the oxygen reduction reaction. 2020, 13: 1408-1428.10.1039/D0EE00092B ↗
43. JY Chen. A novel layered perovskite Nd(Ba 0.4 Sr 0.4 Ca 0.2 )Co 1.6 Fe 0.4 O 5+ δ as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2019, 428: 13-19.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.104 ↗
44. K Zhu. Theoretical and experimental investigations on K-doped SrCo 0.9 Nb 0.1 O 3− δ as a promising cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2021, 14: 3876-3886.10.1002/cssc.202101100 ↗
45. ZQ Liu. Synergistic dual-phase air electrode enables high and durable performance of reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells. 2024, 15: 472.10.1038/s41467-024-44767-5 ↗
46. WL Zhang. A synergistic three-phase, triple-conducting air electrode for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2023, 8: 3999-4007.10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01251 ↗
47. XQ Lv. SrCo 0.4 Fe 0.4 Zr 0.1 Y 0.1 O 3− δ , A new CO 2 tolerant cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 185: 8-16.10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.030 ↗
48. Y Yang. K doping as a rational method to enhance the sluggish air-electrode reaction kinetics for proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2021, 389: 138453.10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138453 ↗
49. XC Dong. Tailoring SrFeO 3 cathode with Ta and F allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 41: e01104.10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01104 ↗
50. F Lu. Application of a negative thermal expansion oxide in SOFC cathode. 2021, 47: 1095-1100.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.225 ↗
51. DM Huan. New, efficient, and reliable air electrode material for proton-conducting reversible solid oxide cells. 2018, 10: 1761-1770.10.1021/acsami.7b16703 ↗
52. YH Ling. A cobalt-free SrFe 0.9 Sb 0.1 O 3− δ cathode material for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with stable BaZr 0.1 Ce 0.7 Y 0.1 Yb 0.1 O 3− δ electrolyte. 2010, 195: 7042-7045.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.015 ↗
53. WP Sun. A high performance BaZr 0.1 Ce 0.7 Y 0.2 O 3− δ -based solid oxide fuel cell with a cobalt-free Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 FeO 3− δ –Ce 0.8 Sm 0.2 O 2− δ composite cathode. 2010, 35: 7925-7929.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.084 ↗
54. L Zhao. Cobalt-free oxide Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 0.8 Cu 0.2 O 3− δ for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell cathode. 2010, 35: 3769-3774.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.039 ↗
55. YH Ling. A cobalt-free Sm 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 0.8 Cu 0.2 O 3− δ –Ce 0.8 Sm 0.2 O 2− δ composite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2011, 196: 2631-2634.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.017 ↗
56. ZJ Yang. A novel cobalt-free Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 0.9 Mo 0.1 O 3− δ –BaZr 0.1 Ce 0.7 Y 0.2 O 3− α composite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. 2012, 204: 89-93.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.044 ↗
57. X Xu. Impressive performance of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using a first-generation cathode with tailored cations. 2019, 7: 18792-18798.10.1039/C9TA06676D ↗
58. YH Gu. Avoiding undesirable cathode/electrolyte interfacial reactions for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells by Joule heating. 2025, 14: 9221040.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221040 ↗
59. YR Yin. Breaking the limits of Ruddlesden–Popper cathodes to achieve a game-changer for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2025, 18: 8130-8141.10.1039/D5EE00993F ↗
60. WJ Bian. Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. 2022, 604: 479-485.10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y ↗