Rational design of PrBaFe 2O 6− δ -based cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Obtaining high-performance cathodes is critical for protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs), as cathode performance significantly impacts fuel cell performance. A full understanding of the interactions among the diverse properties of cathode materials would benefit cathode design. In this study, PrBaFe2O6−δ (PBF) was doped with various dopants, including cobalt (Co), Ni, Cu, Zn, and Mn. Experiments and first-principles calculations are used to study the key properties of dopant-modified PrBaFe2O6−δ, including oxygen vacancy (VO) creation, hydration ability, proton mobility, and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity. There is no perfect dopant that can improve every property to its full potential. Instead, different dopants can impact different properties of the material. Co-dopant has the best cathode performance since it balances the material’s instinctive properties, even though it does not provide a significant advantage in the formation of VO. PCFC utilizing Co-doped PrBaFe2O6−δ cathode has a high performance of 1680 mW·cm−2 at 700 °C, which is greater than that of the other dopant-tailored PrBaFe2O6−δ cathodes reported in this study and is one of the largest ever recorded for PrBaFe2O6−δ-based cathodes for PCFCs. Co-doped PrBaFe2O6−δ cathode is further demonstrated to be robust, with excellent operational stability. This study not only provides a potential cathode candidate for PCFCs but also suggests an intriguing approach to cathode design by carefully examining and balancing different vital properties of the material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. SJ Zhang. Three-dimensional macroscopic absorbents: From synergistic effects to advanced multifunctionalities. 2024, 17: 1952-1983.10.1007/s12274-023-6120-1 ↗
2. JX Zhu. Recent advances in biodegradable electronics—From fundament to the next-generation multi-functional, medical and environmental device. 2023, 35: e00530.10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00530 ↗
3. S Seyam. Environmental impact assessment of a newly developed solid oxide fuel cell-based system combined with propulsion engine using various fuel blends for cleaner operations. 2023, 35: e00554.10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00554 ↗
4. YH Niu. Cathode infiltration with enhanced catalytic activity and durability for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 33: 674-682.10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.037 ↗
5. JX Sun. High-entropy perovskite oxide BaCo 0.2Fe 0.2Zr 0.2Sn 0.2Pr 0.2O 3− δ with triple conduction for the air electrode of reversible protonic ceramic cells. 2023, 34: 107776.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107776 ↗
6. Y Zhang. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. 2021, 591: 246-251.10.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
7. JA Kilner. Materials for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. 2014, 44: 365-393.10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113426 ↗
8. X Han. Utilizing high entropy effects for developing chromium-tolerance cobalt-free cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 33: 2304728.10.1002/adfm.202304728 ↗
9. XX Zhang. Advances in component and operation optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell. 2023, 34: 108035.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108035 ↗
10. Y Zhang. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C. 2017, 29: 1700132.10.1002/adma.201700132 ↗
11. C Li. An active and stable hydrogen electrode of solid oxide cells with exsolved Fe–Co–Ni nanoparticles from Sr 2FeCo 0.2Ni 0.2Mo 0.6O 6− δ double-perovskite. 2023, 2: 100133.10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100133 ↗
12. M Chen. Densification and electrical conducting behavior of BaZr 0.9Y 0.1O 3− δ proton conducting ceramics with NiO additive. 2019, 781: 857-865.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.090 ↗
13. M Chen. Space charge layer effect at the platinum anode/BaZr 0.9Y 0.1O 3– δ electrolyte interface in proton ceramic fuel cells. 2020, 8: 12566-12575.10.1039/D0TA03339A ↗
14. IA Zvonareva. High-temperature transport properties of BaSn 1− x Sc x O 3− δ ceramic materials as promising electrolytes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2022, 11: 1131-1143.10.1007/s40145-022-0599-x ↗
15. ZQ Liu. Synergistic dual-phase air electrode enables high and durable performance of reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells. 2024, 15: 472.10.1038/s41467-024-44767-5 ↗
16. Z Wang. Rational design of perovskite ferrites as high-performance proton-conducting fuel cell cathodes. 2022, 5: 777-787.10.1038/s41929-022-00829-9 ↗
17. P Qiu. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H 2O and CO 2 electrolysis: A review. 2023, 12: 1463-1510.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220767 ↗
18. F Liu. Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to < 450 °C. 2023, 8: 1145-1157.10.1038/s41560-023-01350-4 ↗
19. F Liu. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for synthesizing sustainable chemicals and fuels. 2023, 10: 2206478.10.1002/advs.202206478 ↗
20. Y Yamazaki. Proton trapping in yttrium-doped barium zirconate. 2013, 12: 647-651.10.1038/nmat3638 ↗
21. YF Li. Entropy engineering design of high-performing lithiated oxide cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 12: 2017-2031.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220804 ↗
22. X Yang. Gluing Ba 0.5Sr 0.5Co 0.8Fe 0.2O 3− δ with Co 3O 4 as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 66: 955-963.10.1007/s40843-022-2240-y ↗
23. M Papac. Triple ionic–electronic conducting oxides for next-generation electrochemical devices. 2021, 20: 301-313.10.1038/s41563-020-00854-8 ↗
24. HP Ding. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. 2020, 11: 1907.10.1038/s41467-020-15677-z ↗
25. null10.1007/s40145-022-0662-7 ↗
26. YR Yin. Successful preparation of BaCo 0.5Fe 0.5O 3– δ cathode oxide by rapidly cooling allowing for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 12: 587-597.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220707 ↗
27. F Liu. Synergistic effects of in-situ exsolved Ni–Ru bimetallic catalyst on high-performance and durable direct-methane solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 146: 4704-4715.10.1021/jacs.3c12121 ↗
28. F Liu. Process-intensified protonic ceramic fuel cells for power generation, chemical production, and greenhouse gas mitigation. 2023, 7: 1308-1332.10.1016/j.joule.2023.05.009 ↗
29. FF Dong. Structural and oxygen-transport studies of double perovskites PrBa 1– x Co 2O 5+ δ ( x = 0.00, 0.05, and 0.10) toward their application as superior oxygen reduction electrodes. 2014, 2: 20520-20529.10.1039/C4TA04372C ↗
30. BZ Zhang. Tungsten-doped PrBaFe 2O 5+ δ double perovskite as a high-performance electrode material for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. 2021, 4: 8401-8409.10.1021/acsaem.1c01618 ↗
31. S Choi. Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2018, 3: 202-210.10.1038/s41560-017-0085-9 ↗
32. AS Bangwal. Porous and highly conducting cathode material PrBaCo 2O 6– δ : Bulk and surface studies of synthesis anomalies. 2019, 21: 14701-14712.10.1039/C9CP01813A ↗
33. ZY Zhu. Improving electrocatalytic activity of cobalt-free barium ferrite-based perovskite oxygen electrodes for proton-conducting solid oxide cells via introducing A-site deficiency. 2023, 6: 5155-5166.10.1021/acsaem.3c00014 ↗
34. MA Zavyalov. Influence of synthesis temperature on oxygen exchange behavior of electrode material PrBaFe 2O 6− δ . 2023, 400: 116339.10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116339 ↗
35. YF Bu. A highly efficient composite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2020, 451: 227812.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227812 ↗
36. H Bai. Synthesis and characterization of PrBa 0.5Sr 0.5Co 2− x Fe x O 5+ δ ( x = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0) as oxygen electrode for proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2023, 48: 23655-23669.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.063 ↗
37. HX Zhang. Novel cobalt-free perovskite PrBaFe 1.9Mo 0.1O 5+ δ as a cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 391: 116144.10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116144 ↗
38. null10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.013 ↗
39. BZ Zhang. Cobalt-free double perovskite oxide as a promising cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 15: 8253-8262.10.1021/acsami.2c22939 ↗
40. CH Liu. Ta-doped PrBaFe 2O 5+ δ double perovskite as a high-performance electrode material for symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 48: 9812-9822.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.237 ↗
41. FJ Jin. Double-perovskite PrBaCo 2/3Fe 2/3Cu 2/3O 5+ δ as cathode material for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. 2013, 234: 244-251.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.172 ↗
42. RZ Ren. Boosting the electrochemical performance of Fe-based layered double perovskite cathodes by Zn 2+ doping for solid oxide fuel cells. 2020, 12: 23959-23967.10.1021/acsami.0c04605 ↗
43. FX Feng. Tuning the oxygen vacancy of the SrSc 0.175Nb 0.025Co 0.8O 3– δ cathode toward enhanced oxygen reduction reaction for H +-SOFCs by water uptake. 2021, 35: 8953-8960.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00742 ↗
44. ZT Tao. High-performing proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with triple-conducting cathode of Pr 0.5Ba 0.5(Co 0.7Fe 0.3)O 3– δ tailored with W. 2022, 47: 1947-1953.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.145 ↗
45. R Zhou. Attempted preparation of La 0.5Ba 0.5MnO 3– δ leading to an in-situ formation of manganate nanocomposites as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 12: 1189-1200.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220748 ↗
46. G Kresse. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. 1996, 54: 11169-11186.10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
47. PP Dholabhai. Oxygen vacancy formation and interface charge transfer at misfit dislocations in Gd-doped CeO 2/MgO heterostructures. 2022, 126: 11735-11750.10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02009 ↗
48. DM Huan. Oxygen vacancy-engineered cobalt-free Ruddlesden–Popper cathode with excellent CO 2 tolerance for solid oxide fuel cells. 2021, 497: 229872.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229872 ↗
49. K Wang. Hydration and proton kinetics in Ce-doped Co-free perovskite for the triple-conducting cathode in solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 128: 4404-4413.10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c08256 ↗
50. B Admasu Beshiwork. A defective iron-based perovskite cathode for high-performance IT-SOFCs: Tailoring the oxygen vacancies using Nb/Ta co-doping. 2024, 88: 306-316.10.1016/j.jechem.2023.09.015 ↗
51. HL Dai. Manipulating Nb-doped SrFeO 3– δ with excellent performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 13: 579-589.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220880 ↗
52. AB Muñoz-García. Computational design of cobalt-free mixed proton–electron conductors for solid oxide electrochemical cells. 2017, 5: 11825-11833.10.1039/C7TA00338B ↗
53. XH Zhang. FeO 6 octahedral distortion activates lattice oxygen in perovskite ferrite for methane partial oxidation coupled with CO 2 splitting. 2020, 142: 11540-11549.10.1021/jacs.0c04643 ↗
54. YR Yin. Tailoring cobalt-free La 0.5Sr 0.5FeO 3– δ cathode with a nonmetal cation-doping strategy for high-performance proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 2: 607-616.10.1002/sus2.79 ↗
55. T Hu. Visiting the roles of Sr- or Ca- doping on the oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability of a perovskite cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 3: 91-101.10.1002/sus2.101 ↗
56. HL Dai. A new Sc-doped La 0.5Sr 0.5MnO 3– δ cathode allows high performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 32: e00409.10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00409 ↗
57. E Fabbri. Materials challenges toward proton-conducting oxide fuel cells: A critical review. 2010, 39: 4355-4369.10.1039/b902343g ↗
58. YR Yin. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. 2023, 3: 697-708.10.1002/sus2.156 ↗
59. B Liu. Novel mixed H +/e –/O 2– conducting cathode material PrBa 0.9K 0.1Fe 1.9Zn 0.1O 5+ δ for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 10: 17425-17433.10.1039/D2TA04457A ↗
60. E Fabbri. Does the increase in Y-dopant concentration improve the proton conductivity of BaZr 1– x Y x O 3– δ fuel cell electrolytes. 2010, 181: 1043-1051.10.1016/j.ssi.2010.06.007 ↗
61. RZ Ren. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2020, 3: 4914-4922.10.1021/acsaem.0c00486 ↗
62. XA Xi. Unraveling the enhanced kinetics of Sr 2Fe 1+ x Mo 1− x O 6− δ electrocatalysts for high-performance solid oxide cells. 2021, 11: 2102845.10.1002/aenm.202170187 ↗
63. HP Ding. A novel cobalt-free layered GdBaFe 2O 5+ δ cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2010, 195: 4139-4142.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.006 ↗
64. null10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.001 ↗
65. XB Mao. Performance of cobalt-free double-perovskite NdBaFe 2– x Mn x O 5+ δ cathode materials for proton-conducting IT-SOFC. 2015, 637: 286-290.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.001 ↗
66. B Cai. Comparison of (Pr,Ba,Sr)FeO 3– δ –SDC composite cathodes in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2020, 353: 115379.10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115379 ↗
67. DM Huan. New, efficient, and reliable air electrode material for proton-conducting reversible solid oxide cells. 2018, 10: 1761-1770.10.1021/acsami.7b16703 ↗
68. LL Zhang. Tailoring Sr 2Fe 1.5Mo 0.5O 6− δ with Sc as a new single-phase cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2022, 65: 1485-1494.10.1007/s40843-021-1935-5 ↗
69. YR Yin. Unveiling the importance of the interface in nanocomposite cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 4: 20230082.10.1002/EXP.20230082 ↗
70. WJ Bian. Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. 2022, 604: 479-485.10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y ↗
71. XY Li. Highly stable and efficient Pt single-atom catalyst for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2022, 316: 121627.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121627 ↗
72. C Chen. Cycling performance and interface stability research of tubular protonic reversible solid oxide cells with air electrodes by different manufacturing processes. 2023, 151: 107507.10.1016/j.elecom.2023.107507 ↗