journal article·2025-04Open access

Proteome Size Is Positively Correlated with Lifespan in Mammals but Negatively Correlated with Lifespan in Birds

Juliano Morimoto, Zuzanna Pietras

Advanced Biology· Volume 9· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract The central dogma describes the unidirectional flow of genetic information from DNA to proteins, leading to an underappreciation of the potential for the information contained in proteomes (the full set of proteins in an organism) to reflect broader biological processes such as lifespan. Here, this is addressed by examining how the size and composition of 276 proteomes from four vertebrate classes are related to lifespan. After accounting for the relationship between body weight and lifespan, lifespan is negatively correlated with proteome size in birds and, to a weaker extent, in fish, and positively correlated with lifespan in mammals. Proteome composition varies amongst the four vertebrate classes, but there is no evidence that any specific amino acid correlated with lifespan. The findings in relation to the role of dietary amino acid restriction are discussed on lifespan extension and raise questions about evolutionary and structural forces shaping proteome composition across species.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications · Physiological and biochemical adaptations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Mathematics School of Natural and Computing Sciences University of Aberdeen Fraser Noble Building Aberdeen AB24 3UE UK

Programa de Pós‐graduação em Ecologia e Conservação Universidade Federal do Paraná Curitiba 82590‐300 Brazil

Department of Physics Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University Linköping 581 83 Sweden

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Crick F. H. · Symp Soc Exp Biol · 1958 · 12 · 8
2. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01244-410.1016/S0968-0004(98)01244-4 ↗
3. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-11710.1186/gb-2004-5-10-117 ↗
4. 10.1080/0191312039023164510.1080/01913120390231645 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:102633001528010.1023/A:1026330015280 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20140654510.1002/anie.201406545 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.adg749210.1126/science.adg7492 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41586-020-2402-x10.1038/s41586-020-2402-x ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-019-54447-w10.1038/s41598-019-54447-w ↗
10. 10.18632/aging.10141310.18632/aging.101413 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00239-006-0206-810.1007/s00239-006-0206-8 ↗
12. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-30710.1186/1471-2164-7-307 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-024-77319-410.1038/s41598-024-77319-4 ↗
14. 10.1371/journal.pgen.101063510.1371/journal.pgen.1010635 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.02.00510.1016/j.cmet.2017.02.005 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01783.x10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01783.x ↗
17. 10.1111/ecog.0664310.1111/ecog.06643 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00162.x10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00162.x ↗
19. M. V.Blagosklonny No Limit to Maximal Lifespan in Humans: How to Beat a 122‐Year‐Old Record Oncoscience 2021 8 110.10.18632/oncoscience.547 ↗
20. 10.1038/nature2279210.1038/nature22792 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature1979310.1038/nature19793 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature2278610.1038/nature22786 ↗
23. D. G.Krementz J. R.Sauer J. D.Nichols Model‐based estimates of annual survival rate are preferable to observed maximum lifespan statistics for use in comparative life‐history studies Oikos 1989 56 203.10.2307/3565337 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10522-008-9156-410.1007/s10522-008-9156-4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.01910.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00045.x10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00045.x ↗
27. 10.1080/1063515080230242710.1080/10635150802302427 ↗
28. Pinheiro J. · R package version · 2007 · 3 · 1
29. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x ↗
30. Oksanen J. · Community ecology package · 2007 · 10 · 719
31. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00661.x10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00661.x ↗
32. 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00204-810.1016/S0531-5565(02)00204-8 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02051-510.1016/S0168-9525(00)02051-5 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02414-310.1016/S0168-9525(01)02414-3 ↗
35. 10.1080/14636778.2015.103485110.1080/14636778.2015.1034851 ↗
36. 10.7554/eLife.5579410.7554/eLife.55794 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.161670211410.1073/pnas.1616702114 ↗
38. 10.1098/rsob.24009310.1098/rsob.240093 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11357-024-01078-310.1007/s11357-024-01078-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.10.00510.1016/j.cmet.2023.10.005 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.02510.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.025 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.arr.2023.10192210.1016/j.arr.2023.101922 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tma.2021.05.00110.1016/j.tma.2021.05.001 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-022-34265-x10.1038/s41467-022-34265-x ↗
45. 10.1007/s00360-017-1113-610.1007/s00360-017-1113-6 ↗
46. 10.1093/gerona/glz08010.1093/gerona/glz080 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.11381910.1016/j.foodres.2023.113819 ↗