Interface-engineering to boost the performance and durability of nickel-metal-supported reversible proton ceramic cells for power generation and hydrogen production
Source abstract
Abstract
The metal-supported reversible proton ceramic cell (MS-rPCC) combines the dual advantages of metal support and proton conduction. It can simultaneously achieve efficient low-temperature operation, high mechanical strength, and excellent thermal cycling stability. However, a critical challenge in MS-rPCC fabrication lies in the element diffusion from the metal support and the mismatch between the metallic and ceramic layers. To address this, a rationally designed pure Ni metallic support combined with a transition layer (80 wt.% NiO-20 wt.% BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3-δ (BZCY)) was introduced to engineer the interface, improving the strength and structural stability of MS-rPCC. The cell achieves a peak power density of 0.8 W cm-2 in fuel cell (FC) mode at 650 °C and a current density of -1.25 A cm-2 at 1.3 V in electrolysis cell (EC) mode. FC mode exhibits no significant degradation after 200 hours of operation, with a degradation rate of 0.02 mV h-1. The cell demonstrated exceptional stability during 100 h of reversible fuel cell/electrolysis cycling, thermal cycling, and rapid start-up test. This work provides a new approach for the commercialization and widespread adoption of MS-rPCC for low-temperature, high-performance power generation and hydrogen production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Y Dan. Empowering reversible solid oxide cells at the hydrogen-electricity nexus. 2025, 362: 124677.10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124677 ↗
2. H Liu. High temperature solid oxide electrolysis for green hydrogen production. 2024, 124: 10509-10576.10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00795 ↗
3. C Li. An active and stable hydrogen electrode of solid oxide cells with exsolved Fe–Co–Ni nanoparticles from Sr 2FeCo 0.2Ni 0.2Mo 0.6O 6− δ double-perovskite. 2023, 2: 100133.10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100133 ↗
4. P Qiu. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H 2O and CO 2 electrolysis: A review. 2023, 12: 1463-1510.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220767 ↗
5. XX Zhang. Advances in component and operation optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell. 2023, 34: 108035.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108035 ↗
6. M Yang. Electrosynthesizing high-value fuels from CO 2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells: Fundamentals, advances, and perspectives. 202410.1016/j.cclet.2024.110603 ↗
7. TD Myles. Characterization and performance of proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells manufactured using reactive spray deposition technology. 2016, 72: 17-23.10.1149/07225.0017ecst ↗
8. MC Tucker. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells: A review. 2010, 195: 4570-4582.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.035 ↗
9. MC Tucker. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells: A review. 2020, 45: 24203-24218.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.300 ↗
10. SJ Fu. Fabrication, property and performance evaluation of Stainless Steel 430L as porous supports for metal supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 11: 1127900.10.3389/fenrg.2023.1127900 ↗
11. E Fabbri. Towards the next generation of solid oxide fuel cells operating below 600 °C with chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes. 2012, 24: 195-208.10.1002/adma.201103102 ↗
12. CC Duan. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. 2020, 7: 011314.10.1063/1.5135319 ↗
13. YB Matus. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell membranes for rapid thermal cycling. 2005, 176: 443-449.10.1016/j.ssi.2004.09.056 ↗
14. X Wang. Porous nickel–iron alloys as anode support for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: II. Cell performance and stability. 2018, 43: 21030-21036.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.142 ↗
15. CH Tsai. Characterization of thin metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells fabricated through atmospheric Plasma spraying. 2023, 23: 292-303.10.1002/fuce.202200205 ↗
16. I Villarreal. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2003, 6: A178.10.1149/1.1592372 ↗
17. BX Hu. Ethanol-fueled metal supported solid oxide fuel cells with a high entropy alloy internal reforming catalyst. 2023, 582: 233544.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233544 ↗
18. D Udomsilp. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells with exceptionally high power density for range extender systems. 2020, 1: 100072.10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100072 ↗
19. YQ Wang. Toward mobility of solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 102: 101141.10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101141 ↗
20. MC Tucker. Durability of symmetric-structured metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2017, 369: 6-12.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.075 ↗
21. HR Xu. Status and progress of metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell: Towards large-scale manufactory and practical applications. 2024, 3: 100051.10.1016/j.enrev.2023.100051 ↗
22. G Schiller. High temperature water electrolysis using metal supported solid oxide electrolyser cells (SOEC). 2009, 39: 293-301.10.1007/s10800-008-9672-6 ↗
23. HL Dai. Manipulating Nb-doped SrFeO 3− δ with excellent performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 13: 579-589.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220880 ↗
24. DA Medvedev. Advanced materials for SOFC application: Strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. 2016, 75: 38-79.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.08.001 ↗
25. YR Yin. Balancing intrinsic properties of cathode materials allows high performance for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2024, 4: 262.10.1002/sus2.262 ↗
26. B Bibi. Emerging semiconductor ionic materials tailored by mixed ionic-electronic conductors for advanced fuel cells. 2024, 3: 100231.10.1016/j.apmate.2024.100231 ↗
27. JX Sun. High-entropy perovskite oxide BaCo 0.2Fe 0.2Zr 0.2Sn 0.2Pr 0.2O 3− δ with triple conduction for the air electrode of reversible protonic ceramic cells. 2023, 34: 107776.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107776 ↗
28. LB Lei. Progress report on proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells. 2019, 29: 1903805.10.1002/adfm.201903805 ↗
29. HL Dai. La 0.5– x Sc x Sr 0.5MnO 3− δ cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Taking advantage of the secondary phase. 2024, 13: 1759-1770.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220972 ↗
30. K Park. Understanding the highly electrocatalytic active mixed triple conducting Na x Ca 3– x Co 4O 9− δ oxygen electrode materials. 2023, 13: 2202999.10.1002/aenm.202202999 ↗
31. T Hu. Visiting the roles of Sr- or Ca-doping on the oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability of a perovskite cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 3: 91-101.10.1002/sus2.101 ↗
32. H Zhang. In situ formed catalysts for active, durable, and thermally stable ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells at 550 °C. 2024, 17: 3433-3442.10.1039/D4EE00219A ↗
33. VV Krishnan. Recent developments in metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2017, 6: 246.10.1002/wene.246 ↗
34. N Sata. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells in a metal supported architecture: Challenges, status and prospects. 2024, 6: 032002.10.1088/2516-1083/ad3f6b ↗
35. MC Tucker. Performance of metal-supported SOFCs with infiltrated electrodes. 2007, 171: 477-482.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.076 ↗
36. P Sawant. Synthesis, stability and conductivity of BaCe 0.8− x Zr x Y0.2O 3− δ as electrolyte for proton conducting SOFC. 2012, 37: 3848-3856.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.106 ↗
37. RF Wang. Assessment of co-sintering as a fabrication approach for metal-supported proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2019, 332: 25-33.10.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.004 ↗
38. RF Wang. Approaches for co-sintering metal-supported proton-conducting solid oxide cells with Ba(Zr,Ce,Y,Yb)O 3− δ electrolyte. 2019, 44: 13768-13776.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.181 ↗
39. P Vani. Structural, luminescence and nonlinear optical properties of erbium doped barium tellurite glasses for photonic applications. 2023, 34: 32.10.1007/s10854-022-09480-3 ↗
40. N Xu. Oxidation behavior of a Ni–Fe support in SOFC anode atmosphere. 2018, 765: 757-763.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.326 ↗
41. HJ Cho. Fabrication and characterization of Ni-supported solid oxide fuel cell. 2009, 180: 792-795.10.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.041 ↗
42. Y Zhang. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. 2021, 591: 246-251.10.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
43. HY Zheng. Hydrogen production with a protonic ceramic membrane reactor on porous Fe–Cr alloy. 2024, 9: 3962-3969.10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01173 ↗
44. HY Kim. A high power metal-supported protonic ceramic fuel cell using increased proton conductivity in the cathode functional layer of La 1− x Sr x ScO 3 (LSSc, x = 0.1–0.25). 2025, 13: 1172-1180.10.1039/D4TA06783E ↗
45. S Vafaeenezhad. Development of proton conducting fuel cells using nickel metal support. 2019, 435: 226763.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226763 ↗
46. N Tsvetkov. Advances in materials and interface understanding in protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2023, 8: 2201075.10.1002/admt.202201075 ↗
47. YH Wang. Functionalized metal-supported reversible protonic ceramic cells with exceptional performance and durability. 2022, 3: 2100171.10.1002/aesr.202100171 ↗
48. M Ni. Theoretical analysis of reversible solid oxide fuel cell based on proton-conducting electrolyte. 2008, 177: 369-375.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.057 ↗
49. X Wang. Porous Ni–Fe alloys as anode support for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: I. Fabrication, redox and thermal behaviors. 2015, 277: 474-479.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.165 ↗
50. F He. Electrode performance and analysis of reversible solid oxide fuel cells with proton conducting electrolyte of BaCe 0.5Zr 0.3Y 0.2O 3− δ . 2010, 195: 3359-3364.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.079 ↗
51. SY Gómez. Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells. 2016, 61: 155-174.10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.005 ↗
52. ZW Zhu. Investigation of SmBaCuCoO 5+ δ double-perovskite as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2010, 45: 1771-1774.10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.06.059 ↗
53. RP Reolon. Effects of accelerated degradation on metal supported thin film-based solid oxide fuel cells. 2018, 6: 7887-7896.10.1039/C7TA11091J ↗
54. M Chen. Accelerated kinetics of hydrogen oxidation reaction on the Ni anode coupled with BaZr 0.9Y0.1O 3− δ proton-conducting ceramic electrolyte via tuning the electrolyte surface chemistry. 2022, 605: 154800.10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154800 ↗
55. H Shimada. Effect of Ni diffusion into BaZr 0.1Ce 0.7Y 0.1Yb 0.1O 3− δ electrolyte during high temperature co-sintering in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2018, 44: 3134-3140.10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.081 ↗
56. N Shi. Performance and DRT analysis of P-SOFCs fabricated using new phase inversion combined tape casting technology. 2017, 5: 19664-19671.10.1039/C7TA04967F ↗
57. HY Kim. BaZr(Ce,Y)O 3–Pr-doped CeO 2 double columnar for the cathodic functional layer of Ni–Fe metal-supported protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2024, 7: 7945-7955.10.1021/acsaem.4c01529 ↗
58. YR Yin. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. 2023, 3: 697-708.10.1002/sus2.156 ↗