journal article·2025-08Open access

Interface-engineering to boost the performance and durability of nickel-metal-supported reversible proton ceramic cells for power generation and hydrogen production

Chenzhao Liu, Bo Liu, Zhenfei Li, Cheng Li, Dong Yan, Jian Li, Lichao Jia

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

The metal-supported reversible proton ceramic cell (MS-rPCC) combines the dual advantages of metal support and proton conduction. It can simultaneously achieve efficient low-temperature operation, high mechanical strength, and excellent thermal cycling stability. However, a critical challenge in MS-rPCC fabrication lies in the element diffusion from the metal support and the mismatch between the metallic and ceramic layers. To address this, a rationally designed pure Ni metallic support combined with a transition layer (80 wt.% NiO-20 wt.% BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3-δ (BZCY)) was introduced to engineer the interface, improving the strength and structural stability of MS-rPCC. The cell achieves a peak power density of 0.8 W cm-2 in fuel cell (FC) mode at 650 °C and a current density of -1.25 A cm-2 at 1.3 V in electrolysis cell (EC) mode. FC mode exhibits no significant degradation after 200 hours of operation, with a degradation rate of 0.02 mV h-1. The cell demonstrated exceptional stability during 100 h of reversible fuel cell/electrolysis cycling, thermal cycling, and rapid start-up test. This work provides a new approach for the commercialization and widespread adoption of MS-rPCC for low-temperature, high-performance power generation and hydrogen production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Y Dan. Empowering reversible solid oxide cells at the hydrogen-electricity nexus. 2025, 362: 124677.10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124677 ↗
2. H Liu. High temperature solid oxide electrolysis for green hydrogen production. 2024, 124: 10509-10576.10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00795 ↗
3. C Li. An active and stable hydrogen electrode of solid oxide cells with exsolved Fe–Co–Ni nanoparticles from Sr 2FeCo 0.2Ni 0.2Mo 0.6O 6− δ double-perovskite. 2023, 2: 100133.10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100133 ↗
4. P Qiu. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H 2O and CO 2 electrolysis: A review. 2023, 12: 1463-1510.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220767 ↗
5. XX Zhang. Advances in component and operation optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell. 2023, 34: 108035.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108035 ↗
6. M Yang. Electrosynthesizing high-value fuels from CO 2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells: Fundamentals, advances, and perspectives. 202410.1016/j.cclet.2024.110603 ↗
7. TD Myles. Characterization and performance of proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells manufactured using reactive spray deposition technology. 2016, 72: 17-23.10.1149/07225.0017ecst ↗
8. MC Tucker. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells: A review. 2010, 195: 4570-4582.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.035 ↗
9. MC Tucker. Progress in metal-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells: A review. 2020, 45: 24203-24218.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.300 ↗
10. SJ Fu. Fabrication, property and performance evaluation of Stainless Steel 430L as porous supports for metal supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 11: 1127900.10.3389/fenrg.2023.1127900 ↗
11. E Fabbri. Towards the next generation of solid oxide fuel cells operating below 600 °C with chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes. 2012, 24: 195-208.10.1002/adma.201103102 ↗
12. CC Duan. Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. 2020, 7: 011314.10.1063/1.5135319 ↗
13. YB Matus. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell membranes for rapid thermal cycling. 2005, 176: 443-449.10.1016/j.ssi.2004.09.056 ↗
14. X Wang. Porous nickel–iron alloys as anode support for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: II. Cell performance and stability. 2018, 43: 21030-21036.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.142 ↗
15. CH Tsai. Characterization of thin metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells fabricated through atmospheric Plasma spraying. 2023, 23: 292-303.10.1002/fuce.202200205 ↗
16. I Villarreal. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2003, 6: A178.10.1149/1.1592372 ↗
17. BX Hu. Ethanol-fueled metal supported solid oxide fuel cells with a high entropy alloy internal reforming catalyst. 2023, 582: 233544.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233544 ↗
18. D Udomsilp. Metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells with exceptionally high power density for range extender systems. 2020, 1: 100072.10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100072 ↗
19. YQ Wang. Toward mobility of solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 102: 101141.10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101141 ↗
20. MC Tucker. Durability of symmetric-structured metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2017, 369: 6-12.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.075 ↗
21. HR Xu. Status and progress of metal-supported solid oxide fuel cell: Towards large-scale manufactory and practical applications. 2024, 3: 100051.10.1016/j.enrev.2023.100051 ↗
22. G Schiller. High temperature water electrolysis using metal supported solid oxide electrolyser cells (SOEC). 2009, 39: 293-301.10.1007/s10800-008-9672-6 ↗
23. HL Dai. Manipulating Nb-doped SrFeO 3− δ with excellent performance for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 13: 579-589.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220880 ↗
24. DA Medvedev. Advanced materials for SOFC application: Strategies for the development of highly conductive and stable solid oxide proton electrolytes. 2016, 75: 38-79.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.08.001 ↗
25. YR Yin. Balancing intrinsic properties of cathode materials allows high performance for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2024, 4: 262.10.1002/sus2.262 ↗
26. B Bibi. Emerging semiconductor ionic materials tailored by mixed ionic-electronic conductors for advanced fuel cells. 2024, 3: 100231.10.1016/j.apmate.2024.100231 ↗
27. JX Sun. High-entropy perovskite oxide BaCo 0.2Fe 0.2Zr 0.2Sn 0.2Pr 0.2O 3− δ with triple conduction for the air electrode of reversible protonic ceramic cells. 2023, 34: 107776.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107776 ↗
28. LB Lei. Progress report on proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells. 2019, 29: 1903805.10.1002/adfm.201903805 ↗
29. HL Dai. La 0.5– x Sc x Sr 0.5MnO 3− δ cathodes for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Taking advantage of the secondary phase. 2024, 13: 1759-1770.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220972 ↗
30. K Park. Understanding the highly electrocatalytic active mixed triple conducting Na x Ca 3– x Co 4O 9− δ oxygen electrode materials. 2023, 13: 2202999.10.1002/aenm.202202999 ↗
31. T Hu. Visiting the roles of Sr- or Ca-doping on the oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability of a perovskite cathode for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 3: 91-101.10.1002/sus2.101 ↗
32. H Zhang. In situ formed catalysts for active, durable, and thermally stable ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells at 550 °C. 2024, 17: 3433-3442.10.1039/D4EE00219A ↗
33. VV Krishnan. Recent developments in metal-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2017, 6: 246.10.1002/wene.246 ↗
34. N Sata. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells in a metal supported architecture: Challenges, status and prospects. 2024, 6: 032002.10.1088/2516-1083/ad3f6b ↗
35. MC Tucker. Performance of metal-supported SOFCs with infiltrated electrodes. 2007, 171: 477-482.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.076 ↗
36. P Sawant. Synthesis, stability and conductivity of BaCe 0.8− x Zr x Y0.2O 3− δ as electrolyte for proton conducting SOFC. 2012, 37: 3848-3856.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.106 ↗
37. RF Wang. Assessment of co-sintering as a fabrication approach for metal-supported proton-conducting solid oxide cells. 2019, 332: 25-33.10.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.004 ↗
38. RF Wang. Approaches for co-sintering metal-supported proton-conducting solid oxide cells with Ba(Zr,Ce,Y,Yb)O 3− δ electrolyte. 2019, 44: 13768-13776.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.181 ↗
39. P Vani. Structural, luminescence and nonlinear optical properties of erbium doped barium tellurite glasses for photonic applications. 2023, 34: 32.10.1007/s10854-022-09480-3 ↗
40. N Xu. Oxidation behavior of a Ni–Fe support in SOFC anode atmosphere. 2018, 765: 757-763.10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.326 ↗
41. HJ Cho. Fabrication and characterization of Ni-supported solid oxide fuel cell. 2009, 180: 792-795.10.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.041 ↗
42. Y Zhang. Thermal-expansion offset for high-performance fuel cell cathodes. 2021, 591: 246-251.10.1038/s41586-021-03264-1 ↗
43. HY Zheng. Hydrogen production with a protonic ceramic membrane reactor on porous Fe–Cr alloy. 2024, 9: 3962-3969.10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01173 ↗
44. HY Kim. A high power metal-supported protonic ceramic fuel cell using increased proton conductivity in the cathode functional layer of La 1− x Sr x ScO 3 (LSSc, x = 0.1–0.25). 2025, 13: 1172-1180.10.1039/D4TA06783E ↗
45. S Vafaeenezhad. Development of proton conducting fuel cells using nickel metal support. 2019, 435: 226763.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226763 ↗
46. N Tsvetkov. Advances in materials and interface understanding in protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2023, 8: 2201075.10.1002/admt.202201075 ↗
47. YH Wang. Functionalized metal-supported reversible protonic ceramic cells with exceptional performance and durability. 2022, 3: 2100171.10.1002/aesr.202100171 ↗
48. M Ni. Theoretical analysis of reversible solid oxide fuel cell based on proton-conducting electrolyte. 2008, 177: 369-375.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.057 ↗
49. X Wang. Porous Ni–Fe alloys as anode support for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: I. Fabrication, redox and thermal behaviors. 2015, 277: 474-479.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.165 ↗
50. F He. Electrode performance and analysis of reversible solid oxide fuel cells with proton conducting electrolyte of BaCe 0.5Zr 0.3Y 0.2O 3− δ . 2010, 195: 3359-3364.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.079 ↗
51. SY Gómez. Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells. 2016, 61: 155-174.10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.005 ↗
52. ZW Zhu. Investigation of SmBaCuCoO 5+ δ double-perovskite as cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. 2010, 45: 1771-1774.10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.06.059 ↗
53. RP Reolon. Effects of accelerated degradation on metal supported thin film-based solid oxide fuel cells. 2018, 6: 7887-7896.10.1039/C7TA11091J ↗
54. M Chen. Accelerated kinetics of hydrogen oxidation reaction on the Ni anode coupled with BaZr 0.9Y0.1O 3− δ proton-conducting ceramic electrolyte via tuning the electrolyte surface chemistry. 2022, 605: 154800.10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154800 ↗
55. H Shimada. Effect of Ni diffusion into BaZr 0.1Ce 0.7Y 0.1Yb 0.1O 3− δ electrolyte during high temperature co-sintering in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2018, 44: 3134-3140.10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.081 ↗
56. N Shi. Performance and DRT analysis of P-SOFCs fabricated using new phase inversion combined tape casting technology. 2017, 5: 19664-19671.10.1039/C7TA04967F ↗
57. HY Kim. BaZr(Ce,Y)O 3–Pr-doped CeO 2 double columnar for the cathodic functional layer of Ni–Fe metal-supported protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2024, 7: 7945-7955.10.1021/acsaem.4c01529 ↗
58. YR Yin. A real proton-conductive, robust, and cobalt-free cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with exceptional performance. 2023, 3: 697-708.10.1002/sus2.156 ↗