Interlayer bonding in vat photopolymerization additive manufactured ceramics with enhanced mechanical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The performance of vat photopolymerization (VPP) additive manufactured ceramics is critically limited by weak interlayer bonding, which represents a challenge inherent to the layer-by-layer process. However, current research often optimizes stereolithography and sintering as separate stages, overlooking the dynamic evolution of the interlayer. This study introduces a novel paradigm by conceptualizing the interlayer as a dynamic system evolving under photothermal fields. A strategy of cross-process synergistic control, actively interlayer evolution rather than passively reducing defects, was proposed. We systematically investigate key stereolithographic parameters (irradiance, exposure time, and slicing thickness) and sintering protocols, focusing on the collaborative mechanism between photopolymerization dynamics and sintering kinetics in the interlayer. Orthogonal design identifies slicing thickness as the most critical factor. By precisely controlling the ultraviolet (UV) energy input, a controlled incompletely polymerized state is introduced to enhance interlayer bonding via an effective dynamic balance between primary and secondary photopolymerization. Subsequent sintering is tailored to improve the particle packing density at the interlayer. The ZrO2 ceramic achieves a high flexural strength of 425.89±16.01 MPa and a relative density of 97.21%±0.14% after sintering at 1550 °C for 2 h. This work establishes a framework that links process parameters to interlayer evolution and properties, offering both a practical pathway and a novel theoretical perspective for manufacturing high-performance ceramics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. JC Teng. Co-enhancement of vat photopolymerized 3D printed silica-based ceramic cores by cristobalite phase transformation and in-situ ZrSiO 4 formation. 2025, 1039: 183029.10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.183029 ↗
2. J Yin. Recent advances in 3D printing and densification of SiC ceramics. 2025, 40: 245-255.10.15541/jim20240344 ↗
3. XY Lu. Development of ceramic 3D/4D printing in China. 2024, 3: 200158.10.1016/j.amf.2024.200158 ↗
4. CY Wang. A novel mullite anti-gyroid/SiC gyroid ceramic metastructure based on digital light processing 3D printing with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption and mechanical properties. 2024, 13: 1212-1222.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220930 ↗
5. GQ Wang. Improved mechanical performance and forming accuracy of fluorapatite glass-ceramics manufactured using vat photopolymerization with the addition of zirconia. 2023, 74: 103718.10.1016/j.addma.2023.103718 ↗
6. H Zhang. Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of lightweight and high-strength C f /SiC ceramics. 2020, 34: 101199.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101199 ↗
7. JJ Su. Mechanical and biological properties of zirconia crowns prepared by digital light processing. 2025, 108: 20452.10.1111/jace.20452 ↗
8. SX Zhou. Fabrication of ZTA crowns with simultaneously improved isotropy on mechanical property and surface quality by DLP. 2024, 21: 1593-1615.10.1111/ijac.14631 ↗
9. Q Diao. The applications and latest progress of ceramic 3D printing. 2024, 3: 200113.10.1016/j.amf.2024.200113 ↗
10. KQ Zhang. A review of defects in vat photopolymerization additive-manufactured ceramics: Characterization, control, and challenges. 2024, 44: 1361-1384.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.10.067 ↗
11. M Borlaf. Development of UV-curable ZrO 2 slurries for additive manufacturing (LCM-DLP) technology. 2019, 39: 3797-3803.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.05.023 ↗
12. YX Yao. High performance dental zirconia ceramics fabricated by vat photopolymerization based on aqueous suspension. 2024, 44: 116795.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.116795 ↗
13. KJ Jang. Effect of the volume fraction of zirconia suspensions on the microstructure and physical properties of products produced by additive manufacturing. 2019, 35: 97-106.10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.001 ↗
15. W Yared. Elimination of delamination cracks in ceramics manufactured using LCD stereolithography. 2024, 17: 100531.10.1016/j.oceram.2023.100531 ↗
16. YF Li. An overview on ceramic multi-material additive manufacturing: Progress and challenges. 2025, 7: 042005.10.1088/2631-7990/adbc75 ↗
17. JH Li. Vat photopolymerization of additively manufactured zirconia ceramic structures from slurries of surface functionalized particles: A critical review. 2025, 8: 58.10.3390/surfaces8030058 ↗
18. PK Reddy. Additive manufacturing of yttria-stabilized zirconia using digital light processing: Green density and surface roughness analysis. 2024, 50: 22974-22988.10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.021 ↗
19. LZ Zhang. Fabrication and characterization of ZrO 2 (3Y)/Al 2 O 3 micro-ceramic gears with high performance by vat photopolymerization 3D printing. 2024, 50: 5187-5197.10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.11.264 ↗
20. HQ Gong. Investigating the correlation and composition of organic components in ZrO 2 -based slurry on printability improvement and defect suppression of Vat photopolymerization. 2023, 34: 105149.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105149 ↗
21. RS Zhao. Grain size refinement of additive manufactured Ce-TZP ceramics by coupled two-step pre-sintering and HIP. 2024, 13: 621-629.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220883 ↗
22. KQ Zhang. Roles of solid loading in stereolithographic additive manufacturing of ZrO 2 ceramic. 2021, 99: 105604.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105604 ↗
23. KQ Zhang. Digital light processing of 3Y-TZP strengthened ZrO 2 ceramics. 2020, 774: 138768.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138768 ↗
24. null10.1111/jace.16241 ↗
25. C Huang. A warpage-free Si 3 N 4 slurry strategy for vat photopolymerization. 2025, 14: 9221016.10.26599/JAC.2024.9221016 ↗
26. M Saâdaoui. X-ray tomography of additive-manufactured zirconia: Processing defects–strength relations. 2020, 40: 3200-3207.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.010 ↗
27. JC Wang. Fabrication of zirconia ceramic parts by using solvent-based slurry stereolithography and sintering. 2018, 98: 1537-1546.10.1007/s00170-018-2349-3 ↗
28. Q Lian. Additive manufacturing of ZrO 2 ceramic dental bridges by stereolithography. 2018, 24: 114-119.10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0144 ↗
29. XQ Wu. Influence of boundary masks on dimensions and surface roughness using segmented exposure in ceramic 3D printing. 2019, 45: 3687-3697.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.031 ↗
30. C Marsico. Vat polymerization-printed partially stabilized zirconia: Mechanical properties, reliability and structural defects. 2020, 36: 101450.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101450 ↗
31. W Harrer. Fractography of zirconia-specimens made using additive manufacturing (LCM) technology. 2017, 37: 4331-4338.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.018 ↗
32. Q Lian. Accurate printing of a zirconia molar crown bridge using three-part auxiliary supports and ceramic mask projection stereolithography. 2019, 45: 18814-18822.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.111 ↗