Ultrasensitive low-temperature H 2 S detection enabled by microwave-synthesized CuO/SnO 2 /RGO composite nanosheets with abundant heterojunctions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) poses a significant threat to human health even at trace levels. Rapid and reliable H2S detection with high sensitivity is of paramount importance. Herein, copper oxide and tin dioxide comodified reduced graphene oxide (CuO/SnO2/RGO) composite nanosheets (CSRs) were synthesized via a one-step microwave-assisted method and used as functional sensing layers for H2S detection. The composite consists of secondary CuO and SnO2 nanoparticles, grown in situ and uniformly anchored onto the reduced graphene oxide (RGO) surfaces. The 3-CSR composite with a Cu : Sn molar ratio of 3 : 7 has a particle size range from 6.3 to 25.1 nm with an average diameter of 11.8 nm. The formation mechanism stems from the initial coordination of Sn2+ and Cu2+ ions with the oxygen-containing functional groups on the graphene oxide (GO) surface. The CSR sensor demonstrates an exceptional sensing response to H2S, which is significantly modulated by the Cu/Sn molar ratio. The optimized 3-CSR composite exhibits superior gas-sensing properties, achieving a remarkable response of 28,233 toward 50 ppm H2S with an ultrafast response time of merely 2 s at a low operating temperature of 80 °C. The enhanced performance is attributed to the synergistic effects of numerous p–n heterojunctions, together with the high RGO network, high specific surface area, and oxygen vacancy defects, which promote gas adsorption and charge transfer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Sulfur Compounds in Biology · Industrial Gas Emission Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. HM Smith. Advances and opportunities in H 2 S measurement in chemical biology. 2023, 3: 2677-2691.10.1021/jacsau.3c00427 ↗
2. ZJ Chen. Response enhancement in high-temperature H 2 S-treated metal oxide gas sensors. 2024, 9: 3979-3985.10.1021/acssensors.4c00749 ↗
3. KI Adeniyi. High-pressure hydrogen sulfide experiments: How did our safety measures and hazard control work during a failure event. 2020, 6: 15.10.3390/safety6010015 ↗
4. S Batterman. Low level exposure to hydrogen sulfide: A review of emissions, community exposure, health effects, and exposure guidelines. 2023, 53: 244-295.10.1080/10408444.2023.2229925 ↗
5. YQ Wu. Ultra-sensitive multi-gas detection (CS 2 /SO 2 /H 2 S/OCS) using spectral reconstruction combined with differential temperature conversion. 2025, 97: 19618-19626.10.1021/acs.analchem.5c02998 ↗
6. null10.1109/JSEN.2025.3531888 ↗
7. Y Zhang. Electrospun Cu-doped In 2 O 3 hollow nanofibers with enhanced H 2 S gas sensing performance. 2022, 11: 427-442.10.1007/s40145-021-0546-2 ↗
8. L Yin. Nanoparticle built CuO/ZnO nanowires by coaxial electrospinning for ultrasensitive and selective detection of H 2 S molecule. 2025, 51: 25437-25445.10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.03.227 ↗
9. CC Hu. Chemiresistive gas sensors for intelligent sensing: Design strategies, emerging applications and future challenges. 2025, 54: 11302-11367.10.1039/D5CS00979K ↗
10. SY Lee. Turning on selective H 2 S gas sensing activity in ternary nickel tungstate strongly correlated electron system through sub-gap band manipulation. 2025, 35: 2425477.10.1002/adfm.202425477 ↗
11. TTN Hoa. Highly selective H 2 S gas sensor based on WO 3 – coated SnO 2 nanowires. 2021, 26: 102094.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102094 ↗
12. MJ Zheng. Atomic Ru species driven SnO 2 -based sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of H 2 S in the ppb-level. 2025, 10: 1093-1104.10.1021/acssensors.4c02935 ↗
13. RT Ghahrizjani. Highly sensitive H 2 S gas sensor containing simultaneously UV treated and self-heated Ag–SnO 2 nanoparticles. 2023, 391: 134045.10.1016/j.snb.2023.134045 ↗
14. BY Song. Highly selective ppb-level H 2 S sensor for spendable detection of exhaled biomarker and pork freshness at low temperature: Mesoporous SnO 2 hierarchical architectures derived from waste scallion root. 2020, 307: 127662.10.1016/j.snb.2020.127662 ↗
15. YL Zhang. Monolayer self-assembled film of Pd decorated in-doped SnO 2 hollow nanospheres for ultrasensitive H 2 S MEMS gas sensors. 2025, 440: 137845.10.1016/j.snb.2025.137845 ↗
16. YX Qin. High-performance gas sensor based on Ag@SnO 2 –Co 3 O 4 hollow nanocomposite for fast and highly selective H 2 S detection. 2025, 428: 137239.10.1016/j.snb.2025.137239 ↗
17. DR Miller. Nanoscale metal oxide-based heterojunctions for gas sensing: A review. 2014, 204: 250-272.10.1016/j.snb.2014.07.074 ↗
18. MX Zhang. Interfacial energy barrier tuning of hierarchical Bi 2 O 3 /WO 3 heterojunctions for advanced triethylamine sensor. 2022, 11: 1860-1872.10.1007/s40145-022-0652-9 ↗
19. HY Jiang. Low-temperature H 2 S sensor based on in situ growth of hierarchical CuO/NiO microspheres and the sensing mechanism. 2026, 447: 138893.10.1016/j.snb.2025.138893 ↗
20. ZC Zheng. CuO-decorated bismuth subcarbonate p–n heterostructured micro-flowers for high-selectivity VOC gas sensor arrays and cooked rice quality assessment. 2026, 15: 9221233.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221233 ↗
21. A Mirzaei. Resistance-based H 2 S gas sensors using metal oxide nanostructures: A review of recent advances. 2018, 357: 314-331.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.015 ↗
22. A Kumar. RF sputtered CuO anchored SnO 2 for H 2 S gas sensor. 2022, 370: 132417.10.1016/j.snb.2022.132417 ↗
23. KR Park. Design of highly porous SnO 2 –CuO nanotubes for enhancing H 2 S gas sensor performance. 2020, 302: 127179.10.1016/j.snb.2019.127179 ↗
24. Y Kim. Ultrasensitive and selective CuO/GaN co-decorated SnO 2 nanowire gas sensor with ppb-level detection of H 2 S gas. 2026, 447: 138879.10.1016/j.snb.2025.138879 ↗
25. PM Bulemo. Selectivity in chemiresistive gas sensors: Strategies and challenges. 2025, 125: 4111-4183.10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00592 ↗
26. KL Zhang. Dielectric–magnetic manipulation of reduced graphene oxide permittivity for enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption. 2024, 13: 1974-1984.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220990 ↗
27. LX Ou. Recent progress on flexible room-temperature gas sensors based on metal oxide semiconductor. 2022, 14: 206.10.1007/s40820-022-00956-9 ↗
28. M Hassan. Revisiting traditional and modern trends in versatile 2D nanomaterials: Synthetic strategies, structural stability, and gas-sensing fundamentals. 2023, 12: 2149-2246.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220810 ↗
29. M Hao. Three-dimensional graphene and its composite for gas sensors. 2021, 40: 1494-1514.10.1007/s12598-020-01633-9 ↗
30. A Sharma. Porous materials as effective chemiresistive gas sensors. 2024, 53: 2530-2577.10.1039/D2CS00761D ↗
31. TT Chen. Cu-doped SnO 2 /rGO nanocomposites for ultrasensitive H 2 S detection at low temperature. 2023, 9: 69.10.1038/s41378-023-00517-z ↗
32. L Yin. Ternary SnO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 /RGO composite: Microwave-assisted preparation and its high H 2 S-sensing performance. 2024, 51: 104564.10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104564 ↗
33. YW Gao. Microwave-assisted synthesis of hierarchically porous Co 3 O 4 /rGO nanocomposite for low-temperature acetone detection. 2021, 594: 690-701.10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.041 ↗
34. YJ Zhu. Microwave-assisted preparation of inorganic nanostructures in liquid phase. 2014, 114: 6462-6555.10.1021/cr400366s ↗
35. L Yin. Multilayer CuO/CuMoO 4 /MoS 2 nanoflowers: Microwave-assisted MoS 2 derivation and efficient H 2 S detection. 2026, 450: 139311.10.1016/j.snb.2025.139311 ↗
36. null10.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
37. JP Perdew. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. 1996, 77: 3865-3868.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. S Grimme. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. 2011, 32: 1456-1465.10.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
39. QX Feng. Percolation effect of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) on ammonia sensing of rGO-SnO 2 composite based sensor. 2017, 243: 1115-1126.10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.075 ↗
40. J Guo. Synthesis of hollow tubular reduced graphene oxide/SnO 2 composites and their gas sensing properties. 2017, 209: 102-105.10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.118 ↗
41. DK Xiao. CuO/ZnO hollow nanocages derived from metal–organic frameworks for ultra-high and rapid response H 2 S gas sensor. 2024, 50: 15767-15779.10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.057 ↗
42. LJ Yao. Construction of novel Pd–SnO 2 composite nanoporous structure as a high-response sensor for methane gas. 2020, 826: 154063.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154063 ↗
43. F Jiang. Insights into the influence of CeO 2 crystal facet on CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/CeO 2 catalysts. 2020, 10: 11493-11509.10.1021/acscatal.0c03324 ↗
44. JY Xu. Oxygen vacancy engineering on cerium oxide nanowires for room-temperature linalool detection in rice aging. 2022, 11: 1559-1570.10.1007/s40145-022-0629-8 ↗
45. YW Zhou. Urchin-like Na-doped zinc oxide nanoneedles for low-concentration and exclusive VOC detections. 2024, 13: 507-517.10.26599/JAC.2024.9220873 ↗
46. R Purbia. A thermodynamic approach toward selective and reversible sub-ppm H 2 S sensing using ultra-small CuO nanorods impregnated with Nb 2 O 5 nanoparticles. 2021, 9: 17425-17433.10.1039/D1TA03852D ↗
47. KD Wu. Oxygen vacancy-rich engineering-optimized molybdenum trioxide microbelts for room-temperature ppb-level trimethylamine detection. 2025, 14: 9221102.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221102 ↗
48. XY Miao. Precise preparation of α-Fe 2 O 3 /SnO 2 core-shell nanowires via atomic layer deposition for selective MEMS-based H 2 S gas sensor. 2023, 378: 133111.10.1016/j.snb.2022.133111 ↗
49. Q Hu. Binder-free CuO nanoneedle arrays based tube-type sensor for H 2 S gas sensing. 2021, 326: 128993.10.1016/j.snb.2020.128993 ↗
50. null10.1016/j.snb.2024.136596 ↗
51. D Wang. High response H 2 S chemiresistive gas sensor based on multidimensional CuO/CeO 2 : The application for real-time portable alarm device. 2025, 424: 136884.10.1016/j.snb.2024.136884 ↗
52. YM Liu. Green preparation of nanosheet-assembled CuO/ZnO hollow microspheres based on ammonia etching and ultrafast response to H 2 S. 2024, 500: 157306.10.1016/j.cej.2024.157306 ↗
53. YY Xie. Gas-sensing mechanism and performances of Ti 3 C 2 T x /CuO for H 2 S at room temperature. 2025, 519: 165339.10.1016/j.cej.2025.165339 ↗
54. DZ Zhang. Diversiform gas sensors based on two-dimensional nanomaterials. 2023, 16: 11959-11991.10.1007/s12274-022-5233-2 ↗
55. JY Li. Surface oxygen chemistry of metal oxide semiconductors for gas-sensing applications. 2024, 11: 8602-8626.10.1039/D4QI02385D ↗
56. MY Wang. First-principles calculations informing machine learning framework and visualization system for rapid and generalized gas response prediction in black phosphorus sensors. 2025, 14: 9221243.10.26599/JAC.2026.9221243 ↗
57. SG Deng. Multifunctional SnO 2 QDs/MXene heterostructures as laminar interlayers for improved polysulfide conversion and lithium plating behavior. 2024, 16: 229.10.1007/s40820-024-01446-w ↗
58. YL Zhao. Pt decorated CoFe 2 O 4 /Co 3 O 4 nanosheets derived from 2D Fe–Co MOF for enhanced HCHO detection. 2025, 14: 9221092.10.26599/JAC.2025.9221092 ↗