journal article·2016-09-16

Microfibrillated-cellulose-modified urea-formaldehyde adhesives with different F/U molar ratios for wood-based composites

Nadir Ayrilmis, Jin-Heon Kwon, Seung-Hwan Lee, Tae-Hyung Han, Chan-Woo Park

Publisher page

Abstract

The relationship between urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesives (E0 and E1 classes) and microfibrillated-cellulose (MFC) and its effect on the mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumbers (LVLs) were investigated. Bending strength, modulus of elasticity in bending, and tensile shear strength of the LVLs were determined. The morphology, gel time, viscosity, and acidity of the modified UF adhesives were also investigated. The tensile shear strength of the LVLs significantly increased (2.89 to 3.35 N/mm2) as the MFC suspension was increased to 3.75 g in the 7.50 g E0 class UF adhesive, while it slightly increased (3.10 to 3.16 N/mm2) as the MFC suspension was increased to 2.5 g in the 8.75 g E1 class UF adhesive. The results showed that the bond performance of the E0 class adhesive with the MFC was better than that of the E1 class adhesive with the MFC. The MFC was found to be valuable nanoscale reinforcing filler for the improvement of bond performance of UF adhesive, in particular, E0 class adhesive, in the production of wood-based composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon city, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Basic Science Institute

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69065910.1080/01694243.2012.690659 ↗
2. Frihart CR · 2005
3. 10.1155/2012/15850310.1155/2012/158503 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10570-011-9576-110.1007/s10570-011-9576-1 ↗
5. 10.1163/156856108X29550910.1163/156856108X295509 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.003 ↗
7. 10.1002/978111887224610.1002/9781118872246 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10570-010-9431-910.1007/s10570-010-9431-9 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y ↗
11. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69689210.1080/01694243.2012.696892 ↗
12. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-462810.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-010.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
14. Herrick FW · J. Appl. Polym. Sci · 1983 · 37 · 797
15. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.08510.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.085 ↗
16. Liu H · SWST/UNECE-TC Convention · 2010
17. 10.1007/s10570-008-9212-x10.1007/s10570-008-9212-x ↗
18. Fornué ED · O Papel · 2011 · 72 · 85
19. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.00510.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.005 ↗