journal article·2026-03-18

Effect of nanoparticle infiltration into the opaque agent of pink composite resin on its bond strength with base metals

Gamze Mutlu, Osman Cumhur Sipahi, Birsen Şengül Oksal

Publisher page

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotube incorporation into the opaque agent of a pink composite resin (PCR) on its bond strength to two different base metal alloys.Materials and Methods A total of 84 CoCr and Ti specimens (4 mm in diameter, 2 mm in height) fabricated via SLS/DMLS were assigned to eight experimental and four control groups (n = 7). All metal surfaces were sandblasted and primed. TiO2 nanotubes synthesized in a chemistry laboratory were incorporated into the opaque agent of PCR at 0.5% and 1.0% (w/w). Control groups were coated with heat-polymerized acrylic resin and PCR. Shear bond strength (SBS) between metal–resin interfaces was measured using a universal testing machine. Microscopic and spectroscopic analyses were performed to assess nanotube incorporation and characterize interfacial failure.Results The highest SBS values were observed in the CoCr-TiO2n4 (18.5 MPa) and Ti-TiO2n4 (16.2 MPa) groups, whereas the lowest SBS values belonged to the acrylic resin control groups (CoCr-A: 5.0 MPa; Ti-A: 4.6 MPa). A statistically significant difference was detected between the Ti-TiO2n2 and Ti-TiO2n4 groups (p = 0.033).Conclusion Incorporation of functionalized TiO2 nanotubes into the opaque agent tended to improve the bond strength of PCR to metal substrates. These findings indicate potential benefits of nanotube integration; however, further studies with larger sample sizes and optimized concentrations are recommended.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Applications · Polymer Science and Applications · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Çankırı Karatekin University

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Health Sciences University

Department of Chemistry, Giresun University

Funding

the Scientific Research Projects Coordination of Health Sciences University Gülhane

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598-023-46354-y10.1038/s41598-023-46354-y ↗
2. 10.3390/dj504003310.3390/dj5040033 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1311254010.3390/ma13112540 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.02.00110.1016/j.sdentj.2013.02.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.00610.1016/j.dental.2010.01.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60063-710.1016/S0022-3913(10)60063-7 ↗
7. Ali S. Prosthetic complications and patient satisfaction with maxillary PEEK hybrid prostheses veneered with acrylic or composite resin using the all-on-four concept. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(2):1333–1343.10.21608/edj.2021.54991.1422 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.02010.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.02110.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.00710.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.007 ↗
11. Petropoulou A, Pappa E, Pelekanos S. Esthetic considerations in implant replacement of maxillary incisors: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(3):140–144.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)00056-5 ↗
12. Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, et al. Shear bond strength of indirect composite to zirconia after thermocycling. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(4):629–634.10.2334/josnusd.51.629 ↗
13. Koizuka M, Komine F, Blatz MB, et al. Effect of surface treatments on bond strength of gingiva-colored composite to implant frameworks. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(9):977–984.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02505.x ↗
14. 10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.16610.4047/jap.2011.3.3.166 ↗
15. Coachman C, Salama M, Garber D, et al. Prosthetic gingival reconstruction—Part 1: artificial gingiva as an alternative therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29(5):489–494.
16. Salama M, Coachman C, Garber D, et al. Prosthetic gingival reconstruction—Part 2: diagnosis and treatment planning. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29(6):573–581.
17. Salama M, Garber D, Calamita M, et al. Prosthetic gingival reconstruction—Part 3: laboratory procedures and maintenance. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30(1):19–27.
18. Hagiwara Y, Nakajima K, Tsuge T, et al. Customized implant frameworks veneered with gingiva-colored composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(2):112–117.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.011 ↗
19. Elzarug YA, Galburt RB, Ali A, et al. Shear bond strength of gingiva-colored materials to titanium and acrylic teeth. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(4):313–319.10.1111/jopr.12138 ↗
20. Awan K, Khan S. Nanotechnology and its role in dentistry: a review. Pak Oral Dent J. 2014;34(4):928–933.
21. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.00110.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.001 ↗
22. 10.2147/IJN.S28580510.2147/IJN.S285805 ↗
23. Arora R, Kapoor H. Nanotechnology in dentistry: hope or hype. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13(4):928–933.
24. Tian M, Gao Y, Liu Y, et al. Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resins with nano-fibrillar silicate. Dent Mater. 2008;24(2):235–243.10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.27510.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.275 ↗
26. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1307::AID-ADMA1307>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1307::AID-ADMA1307>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
27. Stürmer M, Garcia IM, Souza VS, et al. TiO2 nanotubes functionalized with triazine-methacrylate for dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 2021;37(2):223–235.
28. Banfield JF. Thermodynamic analysis of phase stability of nanocrystalline titania. J Mater Chem. 1998;8(9):2073–2076.10.1039/a802619j ↗
29. 10.1080/01694243.2021.198228210.1080/01694243.2021.1982282 ↗
30. Ramos-Tonello CM, Lisboa-Filho PN, Arruda LB, et al. TiO2 nanotubes in self-adhesive resin cement. Dent Mater. 2017;33(7):866–875.10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.022 ↗
31. Dafar MO, Grol MW, Canham PB, et al. Reinforcement of flowable dental composites with TiO2 nanotubes. Dent Mater. 2016;32(6):817–826.10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.022 ↗
32. Kantovitz KR, Fernandes FP, Feitosa IV, et al. TiO2 nanotubes improve glass ionomer cement properties. Dent Mater. 2020;36(3):e85–e92.10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.018 ↗
33. 10.1080/01694243.2023.218082010.1080/01694243.2023.2180820 ↗
34. 10.2147/IJN.S8603310.2147/IJN.S86033 ↗
35. 10.3390/dj1111026610.3390/dj11110266 ↗
36. Khan F, Kesarwani H, Kataria G, et al. TiO2 nanoparticles in oil-well cement slurry. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2023;37(10):1666–1682.
37. Pellegrino F, Pellutiè L, Sordello F, et al. Agglomeration effects on TiO2 nanoparticle activity. Appl Catal B. 2017;216:80–87.10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.046 ↗
38. Zare Y, Rhee KY, Hui D. Nanoparticle agglomeration effects in nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;122:41–46.
39. Hu N, Wu Y, Xie L, et al. Enhanced adhesion of TiO2 nanotube arrays on titanium. Acta Biomater. 2020;106:360–375.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.009 ↗
40. Brammer KS, Oh S, Cobb CJ, et al. Bone-forming functionality of TiO2 nanotube surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):3215–3223.10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.008 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10856-020-06431-410.1007/s10856-020-06431-4 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep4184410.1038/srep41844 ↗
43. Jafari S, Mahyad B, Hashemzadeh H, et al. Biomedical applications of TiO2 nanostructures. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3447–3470.10.2147/IJN.S249441 ↗
44. Valdez-Salas B, Beltran-Partida E, Curiel-Alvarez M, et al. Fungal nanoadhesion on titanium nanotubes. ACS Omega. 2021;6(24):15625–15636.10.1021/acsomega.1c00475 ↗