journal article·2010-01Open access

Evaluation of Fatigue Damage in Adhesive Bonding: Part 2: Single Lap Joint

M. M. Abdel Wahab, I. Hilmy, I. A. Ashcroft, A. D. Crocombe

Abstract

The damage parameters for crack initiation in a single lap joint (SLJ) are determined by combining continuous damage mechanics, finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental fatigue data. Even though a SLJ has a simple configuration, the stresses in the adhesive region are quite complex and exhibit multi-axial states. Such a condition leads to the need to introduce a general value for the triaxiality function in the damage evolution law rather than using a triaxiality function which equals unity, as in the case of a uni-axial stress state, e.g., the bulk adhesive test specimen presented in Part 1 of this paper. The effect of stress singularity, due to the presence of corners at edges, also contributes to the complex state of stress and to the variability of the triaxiality function along the adhesive layer in a SLJ. The damage parameters A and β determined in Part 1 for bulk adhesive are now extended to take into account the multi-axial stress state in the adhesive layer, as calculated from FEA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Volkersen O. · Lutfahrtforschung · 1938 · 15
2. Gol M. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1944 · 11
3. Hart Smith L. J. · 1973
4. Frostig Y. · J. Eng. Mech. · 1999 · 12510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1298) ↗
5. Duncan B. · 2000
6. Magalhaes A. G. · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2005 · 25 · 31310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.10.002 ↗
7. Adams R. D. · J. Strain Anal. · 1974 · 9 · 18510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
8. 10.1163/15685610074211310.1163/156856100742113 ↗
9. M Goncalves J. P. · Fatigue Fracture Eng. Mat. Structure · 2002 · 26 · 47910.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00653.x ↗
10. Crocombe A. D. · 2001
11. 10.1163/1568561005106675810.1163/15685610051066758 ↗
12. Abdel Wahab M. M. · Intl. J. Fatigue · 2002 · 24 · 70510.1016/S0142-1123(01)00173-6 ↗
13. Dean G. · 2001
14. Greenwood L. · 1969
15. John S. J. · Composites · 1991 · 22 · 12110.1016/0010-4361(91)90670-C ↗
16. Crocombe A. D. · J. Adhesion · 1993 · 42 · 20910.1080/00218469308044648 ↗
17. Anderson G. P. · Intl. J. Fracture · 1989 · 39 · 19110.1007/BF00047449 ↗
18. Groth, H. L. and Brottare, I. 1988.J. Testing Evaluation29110.1520/JTE10381J ↗
19. Hattroi T. · J. Electronic Packaging · 1989 · 111 · 234
20. Lefebvre D. R. · J. Adhesion · 1999 · 70 · 11910.1080/00218469908010490 ↗
21. Wu Z. · Composite Structures · 2004 · 65 · 33910.1016/j.compstruct.2003.11.009 ↗
22. Akisanya A. R. · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2003 · 51 · 2710.1016/S0022-5096(02)00076-5 ↗
23. Xu L. R. · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2004 · 24 · 45510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.12.004 ↗
24. 2008
25. Solana A. G. · 2008
26. Barber J. R. · 2002
27. Krishnamachari S. I. · 199310.1007/978-1-4615-3110-4 ↗
28. 10.1163/1568561015254083010.1163/15685610152540830 ↗
29. Lemaitre J. · 199610.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
30. Varias A. G. · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1991 · 39 · 96310.1016/0022-5096(91)90014-F ↗
31. Huang Y. · J. Electron. Pack. · 1996 · 118 · 22910.1115/1.2792157 ↗