journal article·2024-12-16

Enhancing mechanical properties of GFRP–aluminum joints through Z pinning: a low velocity shear impact study

S. Karimi

Publisher page

Abstract

Studying the mechanical responses of GFRP and aluminum samples under varying loads is crucial for developing methods to enhance their mechanical properties. This research investigates the impact of z-pinning on single-lap adhesive joints through low-velocity shear impact tests. The study involves testing two types of joints: single-lap adhesive joints and single-lap hybrid pin-adhesive joints with six reinforcing pins, subjected to drop weight tests at load levels of 22.5, 27.5, and 32.4 J. The findings demonstrate that z-pinning can increase the joints’ load-bearing capacity by up to 18.87% and energy absorption by 20.58%. This enhancement is attributed to the additional composite substrate layers in the hybrid joint, which help absorb impact loads. In contrast, in the single-lap adhesive joint, only the layer adjacent to the adhesive bears the impact load. Observations from the tests indicate that in the single-lap adhesive joint, the first composite layer next to the adhesive undergoes complete delamination, whereas in the hybrid joint, all laminates fracture at the steel pins. In summary, this study underscores the significant potential of z-pinning to improve single-lap adhesive joints, providing an innovative approach to enhance their load-bearing capacity and energy absorption.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Composite Laboratory, Qazvin Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00047-610.1016/S0143-7496(00)00047-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11742310.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117423 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11669210.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116692 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.009 ↗
5. Tong L, Mouritz AP, Bannister M. 3D fiber reinforced polymer composites. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2002.
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.012 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830708618610.1177/0021998307086186 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00122-X10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00122-X ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.03910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.039 ↗
10. 10.1080/1537649030674010.1080/15376490306740 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.019 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10354710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103547 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.10462910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104629 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10443-023-10119-7)10.1007/s10443-023-10119-7) ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000147210.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001472 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10443-022-10018-310.1007/s10443-022-10018-3 ↗
19. 10.1080/01694243.2021.198772010.1080/01694243.2021.1987720 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2019.166720310.1080/01694243.2019.1667203 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10303510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103035 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2545710.1002/pc.25457 ↗
23. 10.1163/016942410X50110610.1163/016942410X501106 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.01310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.013 ↗
25. 10.3390/jcs803008410.3390/jcs8030084 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.003 ↗