journal article·2015-11-17

Two dimensional analysis for an adhesively bonded composite single-lap joint based on flexible interface theory

Zhengwen Jiang, Shui Wan, Zhipeng Zhong, Peifeng Li, Shuqin Li, Yubo He

Publisher page

Abstract

An improved two-dimensional model based on flexible interface theory is proposed for an adhesively bonded composite single-lap joint. In the modified model, the adherends are treated as a Timoshenko beam, and the adhesive layer is assumed to be an Euler–Bernoulli beam. The peel stress and shear stress across the adhesive thickness varied. Additionally, the zero shear stress condition at the free end of the adhesive layer was satisfied. Based on the displacement compatibility condition of a flexible interface, the governing differential equations for the internal forces are derived. The stress distributions of the adhesive layer can be obtained by solving the governing differential equations. A comparison of the results between the modified model, existing classical models, and finite element results indicate that the improved two-dimensional model can determine the stress distribution of the adhesive with high accuracy. Finally, the effects of the thickness ratio, Young’s modulus ratio, and interfacial compliance on the stress distribution of the adhesive are studied using the improved model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(ISSN)1528-271610.1002/(ISSN)1528-2716 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.08.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2003.08.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.019 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.02.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.12.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5133-110.1007/978-1-4615-5133-1 ↗
11. 10.1243/03093247V08213410.1243/03093247V082134 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-810.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-8 ↗
13. Goland M · J. Appl. Mech · 1944 · 11 · A1710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
14. Hart-Smith LJ · 1973
15. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90037-X10.1016/0020-7683(94)90037-X ↗
16. 10.1080/1537649070181042310.1080/15376490701810423 ↗
17. 10.1093/qjmam/30.4.41510.1093/qjmam/30.4.415 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.316697610.1115/1.3166976 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1298)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1298) ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.024 ↗
21. Ojalvo IU · Bond thickness efforts upon stresses in single-lap adhesive joints · 1978 · 16 · 204
22. 10.1115/1.342397110.1115/1.3423971 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.024 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.10.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.10.002 ↗
25. 10.1163/15685610074210410.1163/156856100742104 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.02610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.026 ↗
27. 10.1080/1537649049026950010.1080/15376490490269500 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.00110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.017 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.03.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.03.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.015 ↗
33. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-110.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.002 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:3(605)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:3(605) ↗