journal article·2012-11-01

Influence of Surface Treatments on the Mechanical Strength of Hotmelt Adhesive Joints Made of Cartonboards

Christer Korin, Rauni Seppänen, Mika Vähä-Nissi, Nils Hallbäck

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The influence of surface treatments including pigment coating, surface sizing and calendering on the mechanical strength of hotmelt adhesive joints in pilot made cartonboards was studied. The mechanical strength of the joints was investigated using the Y-peel test device at 23°C and 50% relative humidity. Some of the samples were investigated with respect to the failure mode by scanning electron microscopy. The surfaces were characterized in terms of surface roughness, surface chemical composition, and adhesion behaviour. A strong adhesive bond displayed fibre tear. In addition to fibre tear, interfacial failure, i.e., failure between the cartonboard and the adhesive, was the main reason for fracture in the bonded assembly. The most important factor controlling the integrity of adhesive joints seemed to be the real contact area. The adhesive joints showed significantly higher strength when the hotmelt adhesive was first applied onto the rougher cartonboard of the assembly and then the smoother cartonboard was pressed on the adhesive than vice versa. The surface roughness of cartonboards mainly depended on whether the surface was pigment coated or not. Calendering displayed only a minor effect. No clear influence of surface chemical composition of the cartonboards on the adhesive joint strength was found due to the fact that changes in surface chemistry in this study also led to changes in surface roughness. The strongest adhesive joint was created between two medium-rough and surface-sized cartonboards.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Wood Treatment and Properties · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

a Korsnäs, Frövi, SE-718 80 Frövi , Sweden

b YKI, Institute for Surface Chemistry, Box 5607 , SE-114 86, Stockholm , Sweden

c KCL, P.O. Box 70, FI-02151 Espoo , Finland

d Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2 , SE-651 88, Karlstad , Sweden

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Korin C. · Technol. · 2008 · 22 · 2079
2. Berg J.C. · Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. · 1993 · 8 · 7510.3183/npprj-1993-08-01-p075-085 ↗
3. Mittal K.L. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 1977 · 17 · 46710.1002/pen.760170709 ↗
4. M. E. Schrader, in: Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion , Vol. 3, K. L. Mittal (Ed.), pp. 67–91. VSP/Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands (2003).
5. Quere D. · Physica A · 2002 · 313 · 3210.1016/S0378-4371(02)01033-6 ↗
6. Tryding J. · 2003
7. E. F. Eastman and L. Fullhart, in: Handbook of Adhesives , 3rd ed., I. Skeist (Ed.). McGraw Hill, New York (1990).
8. Edin M. · Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. · 2002 · 17 · 39510.3183/npprj-2002-17-04-p395-400 ↗
9. Bikerman J.J. · TappiJ. · 1961 · 44 · 568
10. 10.1080/0021846010803074310.1080/00218460108030743 ↗
11. Al-Turaif H. · J. Coat. Technol. Res. · 2008 · 5 · 8510.1007/s11998-007-9031-2 ↗
12. Viljanmaa M. · Intl. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 2002 · 22 · 44710.1016/S0143-7496(02)00027-1 ↗
13. Albrecht S. · TappiJ. · 1997 · 80 · 190
14. Korin C. · Technol. · 2007 · 21 · 197
15. ISO 536. Determination of grammage.
16. ISO 534:2005. Determination of thickness, density and specific volume.
17. ISO 8791–4:2007. Determination of roughness/smoothness (air leak methods) — Part 4: Print-surf method.
18. R. Seppänen and M. Sjöberg, in: Project Report “Optimizing the Use of Hotmelt Adhesives for Packaging ”, Report no B-1018, YKI, Institute for Surface Chemistry, Stockholm, Sweden (2008).
19. Dorris G.M. · Cellulose.Chem. Technol. · 1978 · 12 · 9