journal article·2019-04-18

Modeling of compressive strength of cemented sandy soil

Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti, Saman Soleimani Kutanaei, Mobina Taslimi Paein Afrakoti

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper attempted to show the application of particle swarm optimization in the prediction of the compressive strength of cement sandy soil from the curing period, porosity of sample and percentage of cement. The results of the study show that the unconfined compressive strength of the cement stabilized sandy soil increases with an increasing cement content curing time period. Moreover the compressive strength decreases with an increasing porosity. The compressive strength improvement due to cement treatment has a larger increase in samples with less porosity. In addition, particle swarm optimization algorithm is and accurate technique in estimation of compressive strength of cement stabilized sandy soil. In order to compare of existing correlations, a total number of 100 unconfined compressive tests and 15 scanning electron microscope tests have been conducted on cemented Babolsar sand. It can be concluded that compared to existing correlations models, particle swarm optimization algorithm models give more reliable prediction about compressive strength of cement satblized sandy soil. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of the polynomial model shows that cement content and porosity have significant impact on predicting unconfined compressive strength.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Babol, Iran;

Department of Civil Engineering, Rouzbahan Institute of Higher Education, Sari, Iran

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/eng-2015-001110.1515/eng-2015-0011 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10706-004-7793-110.1007/s10706-004-7793-1 ↗
3. 10.1080/01694243.2014.99534310.1080/01694243.2014.995343 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000020510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000205 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:8(1216)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:8(1216) ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.00310.1016/j.tust.2013.10.003 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11440-015-0381-010.1007/s11440-015-0381-0 ↗
8. Kutanaei SS · EJGE · 2013 · 18 · 633
9. 10.1590/S1679-7825201400060000410.1590/S1679-78252014000600004 ↗
10. 10.1590/S1679-7825201400110000210.1590/S1679-78252014001100002 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000152110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001521 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000176110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001761 ↗
13. 10.1080/01694243.2015.111007310.1080/01694243.2015.1110073 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12517-014-1458-z10.1007/s12517-014-1458-z ↗
15. 10.1007/s12517-014-1409-810.1007/s12517-014-1409-8 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12517-013-1201-110.1007/s12517-013-1201-1 ↗
17. Janalizadeh A · Sci Iran A · 2013 · 20 · 1401
18. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.00810.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.008 ↗
19. 10.1590/S1679-7825201100020000410.1590/S1679-78252011000200004 ↗
20. 10.12989/sem.2012.43.3.33710.12989/sem.2012.43.3.337 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2016.126468110.1080/01694243.2016.1264681 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.01510.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.015 ↗
23. 10.1155/2013/54921310.1155/2013/549213 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11803-013-0182-010.1007/s11803-013-0182-0 ↗
25. 10.1590/S1679-7825201400030000910.1590/S1679-78252014000300009 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000246410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002464 ↗
27. Choobbasti AJ · J Adhes Sci Technol
28. 10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.53310.12989/scs.2014.16.5.533 ↗
29. 10.12989/sem.2016.57.6.103910.12989/sem.2016.57.6.1039 ↗
30. Kutanaei SS · Int J Phys Sci · 2011 · 6 · 4044
31. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.11.00910.1016/j.enganabound.2011.11.009 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12517-016-2452-410.1007/s12517-016-2452-4 ↗
33. Kutanaei SS, Choobbasti AJ. Prediction of liquefaction potential of sandy soil around a submarine pipeline under earthquake loading. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract. 2019;10:04019002.10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000349 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.034 ↗
35. 10.1080/19475705.2015.106063810.1080/19475705.2015.1060638 ↗