Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of different composite resins
Source abstract
Abstract
This study was aimed to observe the relationship between the different surface treatments and the bond strength of both composite based adhesive cement and zirconia ceramic. Thirty-two zirconia ceramic discs were fabricated by following the instructions of manufacturer (5 × 5 × 1.5 mm). Four subgroups were obtained from the specimens according to the specified surface treatments respectively: (a) C: control groups: no treatment; (b) SB: sandblasting with 125 μm aluminum oxide particles for 10 s; (c) SC: silica coating for 10 s; (d) Nd :YAG laser . The composite resin specimens Panavia F and Clearfil SA were introduced and polymerized to the treated bonding areas. Afterwards the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C during 24 h, and the shear test was applied. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan tests. The bond strength was stated significantly higher in silica coating/Panavia F group (23.35 MPa). The lowest bond strength was stated in control groups cemented with Clearfil SA (12.25 MPa). As a result it was determined that the bond strength has affected the both surface treatments and cement types (p < 0.001). The silica coating –treated zirconia ceramic recorded a significant increase in mean bond strength values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Atatürk, Erzurum, Turkey
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Rize, Turkey
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Della Bona A · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 159
2. 10.1590/S1806-8324200700010000210.1590/S1806-83242007000100002 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-310.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-3 ↗
4. 10.1111/jor.1996.23.issue-310.1111/jor.1996.23.issue-3 ↗
5. Sörensen JA · J Calif Dent Assoc · 1998 · 26 · 207
6. Chang KH · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 183
7. Guazzato M · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 339
8. 10.1067/mpr.2003.5010.1067/mpr.2003.50 ↗
9. Chen JH · Oper Dent · 1998 · 23 · 250
10. 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-310.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X ↗
12. Özcan M · Int J Prosthodont · 2001 · 14 · 335
13. Dérand P · Int J Prosthodont · 2000 · 13 · 131
14. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.00210.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-110.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1 ↗
16. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x ↗
17. 10.14219/jada.archive.1967.017810.14219/jada.archive.1967.0178 ↗
18. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12436510.1067/mpr.2002.124365 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-810.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8 ↗
20. 10.1067/mpr.2001.11984310.1067/mpr.2001.119843 ↗
21. Blixt M · Int J Prosthodont · 2000 · 13 · 221
22. 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90368-510.1016/0022-3913(89)90368-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70068-410.1016/S0022-3913(97)70068-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-910.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9 ↗
25. Diaz-Arnold AM · Am J Dent · 1993 · 6 · 291
26. 10.1089/pho.2007.213010.1089/pho.2007.2130 ↗
27. 10.2341/06-5210.2341/06-52 ↗
28. 10.2341/08-8010.2341/08-80 ↗
29. Della Bona A · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 248
30. 10.1177/0022034595074009140110.1177/00220345950740091401 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.01510.1016/j.msec.2013.09.015 ↗
34. Re D · Eur J Esthet Dent · 2008 · 3 · 186
35. Arami S · J Lasers Med Sci · 2014 · 5 · 171
36. 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-610.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00294-510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00294-5 ↗
38. Frankenberger R · Oper Dent · 2000 · 25 · 209
39. Bottino MA · Int J Prosthodont · 2005 · 18 · 60
40. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00006-310.1016/S0300-5712(00)00006-3 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x ↗
42. 10.4012/dmj.25.62610.4012/dmj.25.626 ↗
43. Valendro LF · J Adhes Dent · 2006 · 8 · 175
44. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.02110.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021 ↗
45. Wegner SM · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 267
46. 10.1007/s00784-008-0222-810.1007/s00784-008-0222-8 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10103-015-1848-910.1007/s10103-015-1848-9 ↗
48. 10.1002/sca.v37.310.1002/sca.v37.3 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10103-013-1381-710.1007/s10103-013-1381-7 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10103-012-1136-x10.1007/s10103-012-1136-x ↗
51. ∅ilo G · Int Dent J · 1993 · 43 · 492
52. 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-310.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3 ↗
53. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-810.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8 ↗
54. 10.1080/00016359842299210.1080/000163598422992 ↗