journal article·2019-12-17

Failure behavior of adhesively bonded joints with a rubber modified epoxy adhesive under tensile-shear combined cyclic loading

Makoto Imanaka, Masaki Kimoto

Publisher page

Abstract

Rubber-modified epoxy adhesives are used widely as structural adhesive owing to their properties of high fracture toughness. In many cases, these adhesively bonded joints are exposed to cyclic loading. Generally, the rubber modification decreases the static and fatigue strength of bulk adhesive without flaw. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the effect of rubber-modification on the fatigue strength of adhesively bonded joints, where industrial adhesively bonded joints usually have combined stress condition of normal and shear stresses in the adhesive layer. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effect of rubber-modification on the fatigue strength under combined cyclic stress conditions. Adhesively bonded butt and scarf joints provide considerably uniform normal and shear stresses in the adhesive layer except in the vicinity of the free end, where normal to shear stress ratio of these joints can cover the stress combination ratio in the adhesive layers of most adhesively bonded joints in industrial applications.In this study, to investigate the effect of rubber modification on fatigue strength with various combined stress conditions in the adhesive layers, fatigue tests were conducted for adhesively bonded butt and scarf joints bonded with rubber modified and unmodified epoxy adhesives, wherein damage evolution in the adhesive layer was evaluated by monitoring strain the adhesive layer and the stress triaxiality parameter was used for evaluating combined stress conditions in the adhesive layer. The main experimental results are as follows: S–N characteristics of these joints showed that the maximum principal stress at the endurance limit indicated nearly constant values independent of combined stress conditions, furthermore the maximum principal stress at the endurance limit for the unmodified adhesive were nearly equal to that for the rubber modified adhesive. From the damage evolution behavior, it was observed that the initiation of the damage evolution shifted to early stage of the fatigue life with decreasing stress triaxiality in the adhesive layer, and the rubber modification accelerated the damage evolution under low stress triaxiality conditions in the adhesive layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technology Education, Osaka Kyoiku University

Department of Chemistry, Osaka Research Institute Industrial Science and Technology

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Bagheri R, Marouf BT, Peason RA. Rubber-toughened epoxies: a critical review. J Macromol Sci C 2009;49:201–220.
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.03.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.03.005 ↗
3. 10.1023/A:100476971989510.1023/A:1004769719895 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.08.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.08.002 ↗
5. Jen Y-M. Fatigue life evaluation of adhesively bonded scarf joints. Int J Fatigue 2018;36:2012–2020.
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90143-510.1016/0266-3538(93)90143-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)83142-910.1016/0032-3861(96)83142-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/0143-7496(95)91622-D10.1016/0143-7496(95)91622-D ↗
13. Imanaka M, Asano H. Effect of rubber content on fatigue crack growth rate under mode I loading. Polym Polym Compos 2017;25:247–250.
14. Ward IM, Hadley DW. An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid ploymers. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1993.
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.011 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.08.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.08.007 ↗
17. 10.1163/016942410X53336310.1163/016942410X533363 ↗
18. 10.1299/jsme1958.27.183610.1299/jsme1958.27.1836 ↗
19. 10.1177/09673911160240030310.1177/096739111602400303 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.09510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.095 ↗