The effects of stress state, loading frequency and cyclic waveforms on the fatigue behavior of silver-filled electronically-conductive adhesive joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Conductive adhesives and filled adhesive systems, in general, are used in a variety of engineering applications. There are a number of issues of concern in the design of joints bonded using electronically conductive adhesives (ECAs) and subjected to cyclic loading. These include the effects of stress state and cyclic parameters (frequency and waveform) of mechanical and/or thermal loading on the fatigue failure behavior of adhesively-bonded joints. In order to study the effects of these parameters on joint behavior, two different joint geometries were designed and tested under a spectrum of fatigue and environmental conditions. The results of our work indicated a profound influence of the stress state and cyclic waveform type on the fatigue strength of the joints. Lowering the cyclic load frequency was also found to reduce the fatigue life of the bonded joints. Keywords: ELECTRONICALLY CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVESFATIGUEELEVATED TEMPERATUREELEVATED HUMIDITYCYCLIC LOADINGSTRESS STATECYCLIC FREQUENCYWAVEFORMFRACTUREENDURANCE LIMITP-N CURVECYCLIC CREEPRATE EFFECTMODE-IMODE-IIICRACK GROWTH
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Smart Materials for Construction · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Wong, C. P. 1993.Polymers for Electronic and Photonic Applications, Edited by: Wong, C. P. 167–220. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-762540-9.50008-4 ↗
2. Hu, K. X., Yeh, C. P. and Wyatt, K. W. 1996.Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Electronics Packaging Technology, Shanghai, China110–119.
3. Harper B. D. · Adv. Electron. Packag. · 1997 · 19 · 291
4. Lau J. H. · 1996
5. 10.1163/15685610484029110.1163/156856104840291 ↗
6. 10.1163/15685610484049910.1163/156856104840499 ↗
7. 10.1163/156856104270832210.1163/1568561042708322 ↗
8. Gomatam R. R. · 2002
9. Imanaka M. · J. Adhesion · 1996 · 59 · 11110.1080/00218469608011081 ↗
10. Crocombe A. D. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1999 · 19 · 1910.1016/S0143-7496(98)00049-9 ↗
11. Sun, C. T. and Chan, W. S. 1979.Testing and Design, Edited by: Tsai, S. W. 418Philadelphia, PA: ASTM. ASTM STP 674
12. Rein, K. L., Stinchcomb, W. W. and O’Brien, T. K. 1977.Fatigue of Filamentary Composite Materials, Edited by: Reifsnider, K. L. and Lauraitis, K. N. 171Philadelphia, PA: ASTM. ASTM STP 636
13. Dally J. W. · J. Composite Mater. · 1967 · 1 · 42410.1177/002199836700100410 ↗
14. Dan-Jumba, E., Zhou, S. G. and Sun, C. T. 1989.Advances in Thermoplastic Matrix Composite Materials, Edited by: Newaz, G. M. 113West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. ASTM STP 1044
15. Curtis D. C. · Composites · 1988 · 19 · 44610.1016/0010-4361(88)90702-1 ↗
16. Xiao, X. R. and Al-Hmouz, I. 1977.Proceedings of ICCM-11Vol. 2, 124Gold Coast, Australia
17. Knauss E. G. · Appl. Mech. Rev. · 1973 · 26 · 1
18. Kilik R. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1989 · 8 · 22410.1016/0143-7496(89)90065-1 ↗
19. Smith M. A. · Composites · 1977 · 8 · 25510.1016/0010-4361(77)90112-4 ↗
20. Marceau J. A. · Adhesives Age · 1978 · 21 · 37
21. Xu X. X. · J. Adhesion · 1996 · 58 · 19110.1080/00218469608015200 ↗
22. Al-Ghamdi A. H. · J. Adhesion · 2003 · 79 · 116110.1080/714906165 ↗
23. Xiao X. R. · J. Composite Mater · 1999 · 33 · 114110.1177/002199839903301205 ↗