Improved one-dimensional beam model for unbalanced composite single-lap joint
Source abstract
Abstract
An analytical nonlinear solution was provided for unbalanced composite single-lap joint (CSLJ) using an improved one-dimensional beam model, which incorporated the effect of bending–tension coupling. The bending–tension coupling stiffness was introduced to characterize the coupling bending and tension behavior induced by the un-symmetric stacking sequence of composite laminates. The governing differential equations captured the bending–tension coupling behavior and the geometrically nonlinear features were constructed based on the displacement compatibility conditions of flexible interface. The transverse deformation in overlap region, edge moment factors and adhesive stress distributions for the unbalanced CSLJ with inflexible, intermediate flexibility and flexible adhesive can be determined by the present one-dimensional beam model. The accuracy of the present model was validated by the comparison with nonlinear finite element model. The effect of bending–tension coupling on edge moment factors and peak values of adhesive stresses was shed light on with the present model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Funding
the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) · the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · the Fundamental Research Funds for outstanding Doctoral Dissertation of Southeast university · the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduated School of Southeast University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.060 ↗
2. 10.1080/01694243.2017.129057310.1080/01694243.2017.1290573 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5133-110.1007/978-1-4615-5133-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.007 ↗
5. 10.1177/00219983950290090610.1177/002199839502900906 ↗
6. Goland M · J Appl Mech · 1944 · 11 · A1710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
7. Hart-Smith LJ · 1973
8. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90037-X10.1016/0020-7683(94)90037-X ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-110.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-1 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:3(605)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:3(605) ↗
12. Li G · 2000
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.09.001 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00419-015-1093-510.1007/s00419-015-1093-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/0143-7496(89)90066-310.1016/0143-7496(89)90066-3 ↗
16. Srinivas S · 1975
17. Adams RD · A method for the stress analysis of lap joints · 1992 · 38 · 199
18. 10.1080/1537649049026950010.1080/15376490490269500 ↗
19. 10.1080/0021846059094491810.1080/00218460590944918 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.280489610.1115/1.2804896 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00030-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00030-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00023-410.1016/S1359-8368(03)00023-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00096-110.1016/S0013-7944(03)00096-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005 ↗