Influence of veneering technique and veneer-coping thickness on fracture toughness of implant retained veneered Y-TZP zirconia crowns
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the study is to investigate the influence of veneering technique and veneer-coping thickness on the fracture toughness of implant retained zirconia crowns. Eighty zirconia copings are fabricated, half of which have 0.5 mm and the other half 1 mm thickness. Each 0.5 mm and 1 mm thickness coping is veneered to overall thickness of 3 and 4 mm using layering and hot press methods. Metal ceramic crowns with veneer-coping thickness of 2.5/0.5 mm are used as controls. All specimens are cemented to implant abutments using zinc oxide eugenol cement and tested using a micro-indenter. Crack lengths for specimens are evaluated to calculate fracture toughness using a formula. Results are analyzed using ANOVA. Veneer-coping thickness of 2.5/0.5 (5:1) and 3.5/0.5 (7:1) show significantly better (p = 0.001) fracture toughness as compared to V/C thickness of 2/1 (2:1) and 3/1 (3:1) for implant retained zirconia crowns. Metal ceramic crowns show significantly higher fracture toughness (p = 0.01) as compared to zirconia crowns of similar veneer/coping thickness. Veneering technique did not influence fracture toughness of zirconia crowns and hot-pressing is a viable technique for veneering Zr copings. Higher veneer-coping ratios i.e. thicker veneer and thinner copings, of zirconia crowns demonstrate better fracture toughness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty Of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Malaysia
Dental Production Laboratory, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Funding
King Saud University
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/258703a010.1038/258703a0 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-610.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.a.v86a:410.1002/jbm.a.v86a:4 ↗
4. Sax C · Int J Comput Dent · 2011 · 14 · 183
5. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x ↗
6. Sailer I · Quintessence Int · 2006 · 37 · 685
7. 10.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-s310.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-s3 ↗
8. 10.1080/01694243.2015.111730410.1080/01694243.2015.1117304 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.01010.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 ↗
10. 10.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-s310.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-s3 ↗
11. 10.4012/dmj.27.44810.4012/dmj.27.448 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60060-710.1016/S0022-3913(11)60060-7 ↗
13. 10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.22110.4047/jap.2011.3.4.221 ↗
14. 10.1080/01694243.2016.118477910.1080/01694243.2016.1184779 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.00810.1016/j.dental.2012.06.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-010.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60114-010.1016/S0022-3913(12)60114-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.01110.1016/j.dental.2008.05.011 ↗
19. 10.2334/josnusd.52.64710.2334/josnusd.52.647 ↗
20. 10.1111/jopr.2013.22.issue-110.1111/jopr.2013.22.issue-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.01410.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014 ↗
22. 10.1111/jopr.2008.17.issue-510.1111/jopr.2008.17.issue-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.02610.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.00910.1016/j.dental.2011.05.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60060-710.1016/S0022-3913(11)60060-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.01310.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.00510.1016/j.dental.2011.05.005 ↗
28. 10.1016/0022-3913(76)90253-510.1016/0022-3913(76)90253-5 ↗
29. 10.1111/jor.2007.34.issue-710.1111/jor.2007.34.issue-7 ↗
30. Liu YH · Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi · 2008 · 43 · 561
31. Proos KA · Int J Prosthodont · 2003 · 16 · 474
32. 10.1177/15440591030820120710.1177/154405910308201207 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.02310.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.023 ↗
34. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00845.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00845.x ↗
35. Dong JK · Int J Prosthodont · 1992 · 5 · 9
36. 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.34910.4047/jap.2015.7.5.349 ↗
37. 10.4012/dmj.2011-02810.4012/dmj.2011-028 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.00610.1016/j.dental.2011.07.006 ↗
39. Ponton CB · Mat Sci Technol · 1989 · 5
40. 10.1111/jopr.2015.24.issue-110.1111/jopr.2015.24.issue-1 ↗
41. Friedlander LD · Int J Prosthodont · 1990 · 3 · 159
42. Yoshinari M · Int J Prosthodont · 1994 · 7 · 329
43. 10.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-610.1111/clr.2007.18.issue-6 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00032-310.1016/S0109-5641(98)00032-3 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.00110.1016/j.dental.2009.07.001 ↗
46. 10.1177/0022034590069002090110.1177/00220345900690020901 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.00410.1016/j.dental.2008.01.004 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.00910.1016/j.dental.2011.11.009 ↗
49. 10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.16210.4047/jap.2012.4.3.162 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60090-510.1016/S0022-3913(11)60090-5 ↗