journal article·2013-08-03Open access

Mixed-Mode Strength of Thin Adhesive Films: Experimental Characterization Through a Tubular Specimen with Reduced Edge Effect

A. Spaggiari, D. Castagnetti, E. Dragoni

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 89· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract The present work deals with the characterization of adhesives in thin film under uniform and multi-axial loading conditions. The tests are carried out with a tubular butt bonded specimen, previously developed by the authors, which ensures both shear and normal uniform stress fields inside the adhesive layer. Stress analysis is performed analytically and shows that, in addition to the axial stress, both radial and circumferential stress components are present in the adhesive layer due to Poisson's effect. This leads to a high level of stress triaxiality especially when only axial loading is considered. The experimental tests performed on eight different loading modes show that the adhesive behaves better under shear stress rather than under normal tensile stress, and its strength increases under compressive mixed mode loading. Among literature criteria for equivalent stress, the Stassi D'Alia criterion provides a clear equivalent failure stress value for the adhesive here examined, regardless of the stress triaxiality. KEYWORDS: Butt jointsMechanical properties of adhesivesStress analysisStress distribution
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0021846810807120710.1080/00218468108071207 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00101-510.1016/S0143-7496(03)00101-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/0143-7496(86)90011-410.1016/0143-7496(86)90011-4 ↗
4. da Silva L. F. M. · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2008 · 22 · 1510.1163/156856108X292241 ↗
5. Adams R. D. · 1997
6. 10.1016/S0950-0618(89)80040-610.1016/S0950-0618(89)80040-6 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:100476971989510.1023/A:1004769719895 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.04.01710.1016/j.commatsci.2011.04.017 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.11.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.11.002 ↗
10. 10.1163/15685610131703550310.1163/156856101317035503 ↗
11. 10.1080/0021846060094851110.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
12. 10.1080/00218464.2010.50615510.1080/00218464.2010.506155 ↗
13. 10.1080/00218464.2011.59730910.1080/00218464.2011.597309 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.00310.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.006 ↗
18. 10.1163/016942410X50768710.1163/016942410X507687 ↗
19. 10.1080/00218464.2012.66083110.1080/00218464.2012.660831 ↗
20. Montgomery D. C. · 2004
21. 10.1007/BF0212817310.1007/BF02128173 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.003 ↗
23. 10.1023/A:102221853015010.1023/A:1022218530150 ↗
24. 10.1080/0021846080208923910.1080/00218460802089239 ↗
25. Drucker D. · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · 1952 · 10 · 15710.1090/qam/48291 ↗
26. 10.1002/nme.131510.1002/nme.1315 ↗