Experimental modal analysis of graphene nanoparticle-reinforced adhesively bonded double strap joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This study performed an experimental modal analysis and investigated the mechanical properties of graphene nanoparticle (GNP)-reinforced, adhesively bonded double strap joints (DSJs). The DP270 structural adhesive was reinforced with graphene nanoparticles by using five different manufacturing methods and bulk specimens were prepared with 1%, 2% and 3% reinforcement by weight. The dispersion of graphene was observed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) because its efficient distribution in the adhesive is directly affected by the mechanical and modal properties of the modified polymer. Furthermore, the damping ratios and natural frequencies of the bulk specimens were also determined. Based on the dynamic characteristics and SEM observations, the most appropriate method to manufacture the joints was selected, and DSJs were prepared by using AA 2024-T3 aluminum alloy as the adherend. After that, the modal and tensile properties of the graphene-reinforced DSJs were determined. Consequently, it was observed that a graphene reinforcement ratio of 2% by weight showed a 36% increase in the damping ratio of the adhesive and a 23% increase in the damping ratio of the joint. In addition, it was observed that graphene reinforcement resulted in up to an 81% increase in the failure strength of the modified DSJs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Igdir University, Igdır, Turkey
Vocational School, Department of Machines and Metal Technologies, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
Funding
Atatürk Üniversitesi
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.06.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2009.06.003 ↗
2. 10.1080/00218464.2016.118706910.1080/00218464.2016.1187069 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.046 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.00610.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.01410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.014 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11668-016-0202-210.1007/s11668-016-0202-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.039 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.046 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.016 ↗
11. 10.1111/ffe.1261210.1111/ffe.12612 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.001 ↗
13. 10.1080/01694243.2016.126465910.1080/01694243.2016.1264659 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.08.00610.1016/j.tafmec.2018.08.006 ↗
15. 3M™ Scotch-Weld™ Epoxy Potting Compound/Adhesive DP270, Technical Data Sheet. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/66773O/3mtm-scotch-weldtm-epoxy-potting-compound-adhesive-dp270.pdf (accessed July 11, 2019).
16. Graphene Nanoplatelets, Material Property Data. http://nanografi.com (accessed July 11, 2019).
17. Aluminum 2024-T3, Material Property Data. http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=57483b4d782940faaf12964a1821fb61&ckck=1 (accessed July 11, 2019).
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
19. 10.1163/156856108X34406310.1163/156856108X344063 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2016.122988110.1080/01694243.2016.1229881 ↗
21. ISO 527-2:2012 · 2012
22. ASTM E756–05 · 2017
23. ASTM D3528−96 · 2016
24. 10.1002/smll.20040011810.1002/smll.200400118 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.06110.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.061 ↗
26. 10.1177/073168441142939410.1177/0731684411429394 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cja.2015.09.00110.1016/j.cja.2015.09.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.008 ↗
30. Rao S. S. · 2011
31. 10.1021/nn901047210.1021/nn9010472 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.05010.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.050 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.009 ↗
34. 10.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.28.029410.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.28.0294 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.09.04810.1016/j.polymer.2011.09.048 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.001 ↗
37. 10.1021/am403867810.1021/am4038678 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.200786710.1063/1.2007867 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.030 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.04110.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.041 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.041 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.06.00310.1016/j.ymssp.2010.06.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.10910.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.109 ↗
45. Padal K. T. B. · Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng. · 2014 · 4 · 753
46. 10.1177/152808371879591410.1177/1528083718795914 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.008 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10853-006-0693-410.1007/s10853-006-0693-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.006 ↗