journal article·2021-02-17

Effect of the geometric shapes of repair patches on bonding strength

Hyunhee Lee, Seokwoon Seon, Soyoun Park, Rashiga Walallawita, Kwangju Lee

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 97· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of repair patches with different geometric shapes on bonding strength was investigated. Four shapes of patches were considered: rectangular patch (RP), triangular patch (TP), inverted triangular patch (IP), and parallelogram patch (PP). The offset distance of two adjacent layers in a repair patch is defined as the tread depth. Four-point bending tests were performed to measure bonding strengths. The bonding strength of IP was the largest because of the spaces between the top and middle layers of patch and the parent structure through which resin easily flowed during repair. There was an optimum tread depth where bonding strength was the largest. Finite element analysis was performed to find the bonding strengths and the positions of crack initiation. The bonding strengths in the analysis had similar trends as in the test results. In RP, the stress was the largest at the end of the fillet, where crack initiation started. In other patches, the stress was the largest in the adhesive near the corner of a glass fiber layer. Amounts of resin that had been impregnated into patches during repair were measured. In IP, resin was impregnated the most uniformly, which enhanced its bonding strength.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of KoreaTech, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

School of Mechanical Engineering, KoreaTech, Cheonan, Republic of Korea

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199831452105810.1177/0021998314521058 ↗
2. 10.1080/00218464.2014.90044910.1080/00218464.2014.900449 ↗
3. 10.1080/00218464.2014.88331510.1080/00218464.2014.883315 ↗
4. Lekou D. J. · Tech. Rep. · 2002
5. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
6. 10.1243/14644207JMDA21910.1243/14644207JMDA219 ↗
7. Adams R. D. · 1997
8. 10.1007/s10443-013-9335-610.1007/s10443-013-9335-6 ↗
9. 10.1080/00218464.2015.107588510.1080/00218464.2015.1075885 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.023 ↗
11. 10.1080/01694243.2012.76192610.1080/01694243.2012.761926 ↗
12. 10.1080/00218464.2014.98537910.1080/00218464.2014.985379 ↗
13. 10.1080/00218464.2013.76613210.1080/00218464.2013.766132 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.01810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.018 ↗
16. 10.1080/00218464.2015.107824310.1080/00218464.2015.1078243 ↗
17. 10.1080/00218464.2015.109563910.1080/00218464.2015.1095639 ↗
18. 10.1080/00218464.2014.89621210.1080/00218464.2014.896212 ↗
19. 10.1177/002199831350880110.1177/0021998313508801 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00029-X10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00029-X ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.11.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.11.012 ↗
22. 10.1177/146442071666640010.1177/1464420716666400 ↗
23. 10.1080/00218464.2015.111698410.1080/00218464.2015.1116984 ↗
24. 10.1080/00218464.2016.120423610.1080/00218464.2016.1204236 ↗
25. 10.1080/00218464.2015.110322710.1080/00218464.2015.1103227 ↗
26. 10.1080/00218464.2014.99470310.1080/00218464.2014.994703 ↗
27. 10.1177/002199831453103110.1177/0021998314531031 ↗
28. ASTM D6272-02 · 2002
29. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.007 ↗
30. ASTM D5573-99 · 2012