Fatigue of glued-in rods in engineered hardwood products — Part II: Numerical modelling
Source abstract
Abstract
Fatigue behaviour of materials is traditionally performed on probes that ensure that stresses (or strains) are very uniform. This is a situation seldom encountered in most adhesively bonded joints, where stresses usually peak at the end of the overlaps. This paper presents a relatively simple model to predict the fatigue behaviour of glued-in rods (GiR) involving hardwood in previously investigated in an extensive experimental campaign. The model is based on strength and stiffness degradation of the components of the GiR, which were experimentally estimated in small scale tests. Based thereupon, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used to estimate the effect of material degradation on the residual strength of the GiR, which was then interpreted as S-N-curves. The influence of several parameters, e.g. strength and stiffness degradation rates and the magnitude of the residual strength threshold were numerically investigated. The result showed that it is possible, using a practitioner adapted numerical model, to predict the fatigue behaviour of GiR, based upon comparatively simple fatigue characterisation on their components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Wood Treatment and Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
TU Dortmund University
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials
University of Applied Sciences Wiesbaden Rüsselsheim
Funding
Internationaler Verein für Technische Holzfragen e.V.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2307/310674810.2307/3106748 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0337217410.1007/BF03372174 ↗
3. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000051910.1061/JSDEAG.0000519 ↗
4. 10.1260/030952404121086510.1260/0309524041210865 ↗
5. Jacobs, A.; Sundnes, J.; Baker, A.; Timmers, M. Mass Timber High-Rise Design, Cost and Schedule Research: Competitive Advantages of Wood over Concrete. Structures and Architecture - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Structures and Architecture, Guimares, Portugal. ICSA 2016, 2016; pp 1481–1489.
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000072610.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000726 ↗
7. Wöhler, A.;. Über die Festigkeitsversuche mit Eisen und Stahl; Ernst & Sohn: Berlin, 1870.
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00066-010.1016/S0950-0618(00)00066-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.03110.1016/j.cma.2014.10.031 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(93)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(93) ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.008 ↗
13. 10.1023/A:100444080133110.1023/A:1004440801331 ↗
14. Desch, H. E.; Dinwoodie, J. M. Timber. Structure, Properties, Conversion and Use. Macmillan Education, Palgrave: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 7.10.1007/978-1-349-13427-4 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00107-016-1082-610.1007/s00107-016-1082-6 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00107005020410.1007/s001070050204 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0061241610.1007/BF00612416 ↗
18. Clorius, C. O.; Pedersen, M. U.; Hoffmeyer, P.; Damkilde, L. Compressive Fatigue in Wood. Wood Sci. Technol.. [Online]. 2000, (34), 21–37.
19. 10.1007/s00107005039110.1007/s001070050391 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00107005040510.1007/s001070050405 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.400945810.1115/1.4009458 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00018-810.1016/S0142-1123(98)00018-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.023 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199830404208110.1177/0021998304042081 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x ↗
27. 10.1155/2016/957352410.1155/2016/9573524 ↗
28. Castillo, E.; Fernández-Canteli, A. A Unified Statistical Methodology for Modeling Fatigue Damage; Springer: Dordrecht, 2009.
29. 10.1115/1.366225610.1115/1.3662256 ↗
30. Marin, J.;. Mechanical Behavior of Engineering Materials; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.
31. 10.1177/00219983830170020310.1177/002199838301700203 ↗
32. 10.1177/00219983840180010110.1177/002199838401800101 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.11410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.114 ↗
34. 10.1177/00219983870210010110.1177/002199838702100101 ↗
35. 10.1177/00219983990330070210.1177/002199839903300702 ↗
36. 10.1177/00219983870210040510.1177/002199838702100405 ↗
37. Madsen, Henrik O. “Bayesian fatigue life prediction”. Probabilisticmethods in the Mechanics of Solids and Structures. Springer: Berlin,Heidelberg, 1985. 395–406.
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.09430110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.094301 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.012 ↗
40. Reifsnider K. L.; Jen M. H. R. Composite-flywheel durabilityand life. Part II. Long-term materials data. No. UCRL-15523-Pt. 2.Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg (USA) 1982.
41. Freudenthal. Statistical Approach to Brittle Fracture. An Advanced Treatise, Vol. II; Mathematical Fundamentals; Academic press: New-York, London, 1968.
42. 10.1137/011605210.1137/0116052 ↗
43. Weibull, E. H. W.;. A Statistical Representation of Fatigue Failures in Solids. Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,Sweden, November 27, 1949.
44. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.1610.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.16 ↗
45. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.4010.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.40 ↗
46. Castillo, E.; Fernandez-Canteli, A. A Unified Statistical Methodology for Modeling Fatigue Damage, 1st ed.; Softcover version of original hardcover edition 2009; Springer Netherland: Berlin, 2010.
47. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.006 ↗
48. 10.1177/002199830707873510.1177/0021998307078735 ↗
49. 10.22190/FUME180321014C10.22190/FUME180321014C ↗
50. 10.1080/00218464.2015.111492710.1080/00218464.2015.1114927 ↗
51. 10.1080/00218464.2016.118154810.1080/00218464.2016.1181548 ↗
52. Vassilopoulos, A. P., Ed.. Fatigue and Fracture of Adhesively-Bonded Composite Joints. Behaviour, Simulation and Modelling; Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering 52; WP Woodhead Publ./Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2015.
53. 10.1515/hf-2016-015410.1515/hf-2016-0154 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.07.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2007.07.001 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.11.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.11.002 ↗
56. 10.1080/00218464.2017.129134910.1080/00218464.2017.1291349 ↗
57. 10.1617/s11527-015-0640-410.1617/s11527-015-0640-4 ↗
58. 10.1007/s00226-011-0424-010.1007/s00226-011-0424-0 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.004 ↗
60. Myslicki S.; Bletz-Mühldorfer O.; Diehl F.; Vallée T.; Scholz R.; Walther F. Fatigue of Glued-In Rods in Engineered Hardwood Products — Part I: Experimental Results. Journal of Adhesion. [Online]. 2018.10.1080/00218464.2018.1555477 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.10.00110.1016/j.probengmech.2008.10.001 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.001 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.004 ↗
64. 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00058-X10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00058-X ↗
65. Norris, C. B.;. Strength of Orthotropic Materials Subjected to Combined Stresses; Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, 1962.
66. 10.1617/s11527-006-9155-310.1617/s11527-006-9155-3 ↗
67. Kaufmann M.; Kolbe J.; Vallée T. Hardwood Rods Glued into Softwood Using Environmentally Sustainable Adhesives. The Journal of Adhesion 94(11) 991–1016.10.1080/00218464.2017.1385459 ↗
68. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00043-910.1016/S0143-7496(00)00043-9 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.087 ↗
70. 10.1023/A:101756521527410.1023/A:1017565215274 ↗