journal article·2025-01-02

Comparison between cure kinetics by means of dynamic rheology and DSC of formaldehyde-based wood adhesives

Latifeh Nasseri, Catherine Rosenfeld, Pia Solt-Rindler, Roland Mitter, Johann Moser, Andreas Kandelbauer, Johannes Konnerth, Hendrikus W.G. Van Herwijnen

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 101· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Comparative analysis of the chemical and rheological curing kinetics of formaldehyde-based wood adhesives is crucial for assessing their respective performance. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and rheometry are the conventional techniques used for monitoring the curing processes leading to crosslinking polymerization of the adhesives. However, the direct comparison of these techniques is inappropriate due to the intrinsic differences in their underlying procedures. To address this challenge, the two adhesive samples were sequentially cured, firstly with rheometry and followed by DSC. The observed higher curing degree in the subsequent DSC procedure underpins the incomplete curing of the samples during initial rheometry. Furthermore, the comparative assessment of the activation energies, molar ratios, and active groups of the two adhesives highlights the importance of the pre-exponential factor in addition to the activation energies, as it attributes to the probability of active groups coinciding at the appropriate spatial arrangement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer composites and self-healing · Lignin and Wood Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, Institute of Wood Technology and Renewable Materials, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

Wood K plus - Competence Centre for Wood Composites & Wood Chemistry, Kompetenzzentrum Holz GmbH, Linz, Austria

Egger, Fritz Egger GmbH & Co OG, Unterradlberg, Austria

Metadynea, Metadynea Austria GmbH, Krems, Austria

Center for Process Analysis & Technology (PA&T), School of Applied Chemistry, Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Germany

Funding

FFG

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1302022010.3390/polym13020220 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.007 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.2353810.1002/app.23538 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.00510.1016/j.tca.2017.06.005 ↗
5. 10.1002/9783527828692.ch710.1002/9783527828692.ch7 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.00910.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107300 ↗
8. 10.3390/polym1111180410.3390/polym11111804 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.021 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00226-019-01092-110.1007/s00226-019-01092-1 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3029410.1002/app.30294 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.05.02710.1016/j.cej.2009.05.027 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00107-012-0612-010.1007/s00107-012-0612-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.01610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.016 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1311173410.3390/polym13111734 ↗
16. 10.1134/S199542121903002X10.1134/S199542121903002X ↗
17. 10.32604/jrm.2022.01960210.32604/jrm.2022.019602 ↗
18. Humphrey P. E. A Device to Test Adhesive Bonds. US Patent number 5 170 028 (and other patents). US Patent Office. 1993: Washington DC USA.
19. 10.1021/ma060049a10.1021/ma060049a ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.06010.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.060 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsapm.3c0096410.1021/acsapm.3c00964 ↗
22. 10.2298/HEMIND110912088P10.2298/HEMIND110912088P ↗
23. 10.1007/s10973-014-3946-510.1007/s10973-014-3946-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12681410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126814 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17855210.1016/j.tca.2020.178552 ↗
26. Popović, M.; Djiporović-Momčilović, M.; Budinski-Simendić, J.; Jovičić, M.; Gavrilović-grmuša, I. The Influence of Wood Extracts on the Curing Kinetics of Urea-Formaldehyde Adhesive Studied by Iso-Conversional Method. Pro. Ligno. 2013, 9(4), 153–163.
27. 10.1002/pc.1027010.1002/pc.10270 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tca.2010.11.00110.1016/j.tca.2010.11.001 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10973-011-2138-910.1007/s10973-011-2138-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.07.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.07.010 ↗
31. 10.1002/pen.1112410.1002/pen.11124 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10317810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103178 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00226-010-0359-x10.1007/s00226-010-0359-x ↗
34. 10.1080/01694243.2013.76480910.1080/01694243.2013.764809 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10973-005-0855-710.1007/s10973-005-0855-7 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10570-015-0818-510.1007/s10570-015-0818-5 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00226-013-0565-410.1007/s00226-013-0565-4 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.2033110.1002/app.20331 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.00810.1016/j.msec.2010.07.008 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00391-X10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00391-X ↗
41. 10.1002/app.5063510.1002/app.50635 ↗
42. George, G. A.; Halley, P. J. Chemorheology and Chemorheological Modelling. In Chemorheology of Polymers: From Fundamental Principles to Reactive Processing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2009; pp. 351–374 .
43. 10.1002/pen.76027220910.1002/pen.760272209 ↗
44. 10.1002/polc.507006012110.1002/polc.5070060121 ↗
45. 10.1007/978-3-319-14175-610.1007/978-3-319-14175-6 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.12.02210.1016/j.tca.2008.12.022 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10973-016-5768-010.1007/s10973-016-5768-0 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17859710.1016/j.tca.2020.178597 ↗
49. 10.3390/molecules2611307710.3390/molecules26113077 ↗
50. 10.1201/9780203912225.ch3210.1201/9780203912225.ch32 ↗