journal article·2019-06Open access

Strain-based methodology for mixed-mode I+II fracture: A new partitioning method for bi-material adhesively bonded joints

Marcio Moreira Arouche, Wandong Wang, Sofia Teixeira de Freitas, Silvio de Barros

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 95· Issue 5-7

Abstract

The dissemination of composite materials introduces applications of hybrid structures with composite and metal parts. The development of reliable methodologies to evaluate the performance of these structures is required. In this work, the mixed-mode fracture behaviour of a bi-material adhesively bonded joint is investigated. A new strain-based criterion for the design of the mixed-mode bending (MMB) bi-material specimen is suggested. A new analytical partitioning method based on the ‘global method’ is proposed and tested on a composite-to-metal bonded joint and compared with a finite element model using the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT). The results show that the proposed strain-based design methodology can be successfully used in MMB test for bi-material joints. The fracture mode partitioning is accurately predicted by the analytical method. However, the absolute values of the strain energy release rate (SERR) predicted by the analytical method are only accurate if the shear deformation in the test is not significant.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Federal Centre for Technological Education of Rio de Janeiro

Delft University of Technology

Université de Nantes

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0274998210.1007/BF02749982 ↗
2. 10.1007/S11837-007-0022-710.1007/S11837-007-0022-7 ↗
3. 10.1080/00218464.2016.117751410.1080/00218464.2016.1177514 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00040-010.1016/S0950-0618(03)00040-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.02310.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.023 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.027 ↗
8. 10.1080/00218464.2013.85042410.1080/00218464.2013.850424 ↗
9. 10.1080/00218464.2013.85907510.1080/00218464.2013.859075 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00124-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00124-7 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0036783810.1007/BF00367838 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0003452510.1007/BF00034525 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10704-008-9200-z10.1007/s10704-008-9200-z ↗
14. 10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.031 ↗
16. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-310.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-3 ↗
17. 10.2514/3.2520410.2514/3.25204 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.04.01410.1016/j.tafmec.2017.04.014 ↗
19. 10.1520/CTR10078J10.1520/CTR10078J ↗
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00258-010.1016/S0266-3538(02)00258-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.013 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.014 ↗
25. 10.1080/0021846021040810.1080/00218460210408 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.03.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.03.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.05910.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.059 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.06010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.060 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.03.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.08.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.08.011 ↗
32. 10.1080/00218464.2017.132098810.1080/00218464.2017.1320988 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.159567710.1115/1.1595677 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10704-006-0069-410.1007/s10704-006-0069-4 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0001779010.1007/BF00017790 ↗
36. Hibbeler, R. C. Mechanics of Materials, 7th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall; São Paulo, 2010.
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.007 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.033 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.05810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.058 ↗
40. Meniconi, L. C. M.; Porciúncula, I. N.; McGeorge, D.; Pedersen, A. Structural Repair at a Production Platform by Means of a Composite Material Patch. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 3–6, 2010.
41. ASTM International. D6671M-13: Standard Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D6671D6671M-13e1 (accessed Feb 22 2018).