Experimental investigation of an adhesive fracture energy measurement by preventing plastic deformation of substrates in a double cantilever beam test
Source abstract
Abstract
A method to prevent substrate damage in a double cantilever beam (DCB) test was experimentally investigated by changing bond-line width. Highly toughened adhesives are developed due to an increase in the demand for structural adhesives. Furthermore, structural materials that are lightweight and excellent in mechanical properties but have limitations in thickness are developed. In contrast, plastic deformation of the substrates is expected when the DCB test is performed with conventional DCB specimens using the aforementioned adhesives and materials. The reduction in the maximum stress on the substrate surface by narrowing a bond-line width is a practical method to prevent plastic deformation when a substrate possesses limited thickness. In this study, the influence of the bond-line width on an adhesive fracture energy in mode I was experimentally investigated by manufacturing DCB specimens in which the bond-line width is narrower than the substrate width. Additionally, the maximum bond-line width to prevent plastic deformation of the substrates was theoretically derived. The evaluated criteria for examining the existence of the plastic deformation by changing the bond-line width exhibited good agreement with the experiment results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Automotive Solution Center, Technical Development Group, Kobe Steel, Ltd, Kobe, Japan
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12544-008-0001-210.1007/s12544-008-0001-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.02.01310.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.02.013 ↗
3. 10.1179/13621719910153801210.1179/136217199101538012 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0322491610.1007/BF03224916 ↗
5. ASTM D3433-99 · 2012
6. ISO 25217:2009(E) · 2009
7. Mostovoy S. · J. Mater. · 1967 · 2 · 661
8. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-010.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00047-210.1016/S0143-7496(03)00047-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.006 ↗
11. 10.1177/00219983870210040310.1177/002199838702100403 ↗
12. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-410.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4 ↗
13. 10.1243/03093247V24420710.1243/03093247V244207 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0115150210.1007/BF01151502 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.013 ↗
16. 10.1186/s40563-017-0087-710.1186/s40563-017-0087-7 ↗
17. 10.11618/adhesion.53.33010.11618/adhesion.53.330 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.009 ↗
19. 10.1109/TCAPT.2003.81764610.1109/TCAPT.2003.817646 ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983920260110110.1177/002199839202601101 ↗
21. 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00047-X10.1016/0263-8223(95)00047-X ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.006 ↗
23. 10.1080/00218464.2015.107010110.1080/00218464.2015.1070101 ↗