Evaluation of different modelling conditions in the cohesive zone analysis of single-lap bonded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Cohesive Zone Models (CZM) are widely used for the strength prediction of adhesive joints. Different simulation conditions, such as damage initiation and growth criteria, are available for use in CZM analyses to provide the mixed-mode behaviour. Thus, it is highly relevant to understand in detail their influence on the simulations’ outcome. This work studies the influence of different conditions used in CZM simulations to model a thin adhesive layer in single-lap joints (SLJ) under a tensile loading, for an estimation of their influence on the strength prediction under diverse geometrical and material conditions. Validation with experimental data is considered. Adhesives ranging from brittle to highly ductile and overlap lengths (LO) between 12.5 and 50 mm were considered. Different studies were considered: Variation of the elastic stiffness of the cohesive laws, different mesh refinements, study of the element type, and evaluation of several damage initiation and growth criteria. The analysis carried out in this work confirmed the known suitability of CZM for static strength prediction of bonded joints and pointed out the best set of numerical conditions for this purpose. Inaccurate results can be obtained if the choice of the modelling conditions is not the most suitable for the problem.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal
INEGI – Pólo FEUP, Porto, Portugal
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.7603/s40632-015-0036-110.7603/s40632-015-0036-1 ↗
2. 10.1080/00218464.2014.91492710.1080/00218464.2014.914927 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.21810.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.218 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.01210.1016/j.cja.2013.04.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.11.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.11.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.03010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.030 ↗
7. Petrie E. W. · 1999
8. 10.1533/978184569075510.1533/9781845690755 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.00110.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.001 ↗
10. Ayatollahi, M. R., Giv, A. N., Razavi, S. M. J., and Khoramishad, H. J. Adhes. 1–18 (2016).
11. Volkersen O. · Luftfahrtforschung · 1938 · 15 · 41
12. 10.1177/073168440707002610.1177/0731684407070026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.001 ↗
14. 10.1163/156856199X0041510.1163/156856199X00415 ↗
15. 10.1177/00219983720060020210.1177/002199837200600202 ↗
16. 10.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.01910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-110.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.12.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.12.003 ↗
22. 10.1080/01694243.2015.113180610.1080/01694243.2015.1131806 ↗
23. 10.1080/00218464.2015.105816410.1080/00218464.2015.1058164 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.09.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2015.09.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.11.01610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.11.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
29. 10.1080/00218464.2012.66083410.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
31. Faneco T. M. S. · J. Test. Eval
32. Leitão, A. C. C., Campilho, R. D. S. G., and Moura, D. C. Exp. Mech. 1–14 (2015).
33. 10.1080/00218464.2015.110322710.1080/00218464.2015.1103227 ↗
34. ABAQUS® Documentation, Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, 2009.
35. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
37. Adams R. D. · 1997
38. 10.1243/03093247V09318510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
39. Ebnesajjad S. · 2014
40. 10.1080/00218464.2014.99470310.1080/00218464.2014.994703 ↗
41. de Sousa C. C. R. G. · 2016
42. 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-810.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-8 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00344-X10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00344-X ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.054 ↗