Thermal runaway routes of large-format lithium-sulfur pouch cell batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries emerge as one of the most attractive energy storage systems due to their ultra-high theoretical energy densities, but the pace of their thermal safety assessment is obviously lagging behind. Herein, by investigating the thermal runaway behavior of Li-S pouch cells from the materials level, we unprecedentedly revealed that the thermal runaway route starts from cathode-induced reactions and then gets accelerated by reactions from the anode. Besides, the solvent vaporization is verified to dominate pressure building up during thermal runaway. Moreover, Li-S batteries employing varied electrolytes with different thermal stabilities, even inorganic all solid-state electrolytes, all undergo rapid thermal runaway at a narrow temperature range due to the intrinsic thermal features of the sulfur cathode and Li metal anode sublimating, melting, and cross-reacting at high temperatures. The in-depth depicted thermal runaway routes will deliver great inspiration for mitigating the safety issues of next generation batteries. Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries emerge as one of the most attractive energy storage systems due to their ultra-high theoretical energy densities, but the pace of their thermal safety assessment is obviously lagging behind. Herein, by investigating the thermal runaway behavior of Li-S pouch cells from the materials level, we unprecedentedly revealed that the thermal runaway route starts from cathode-induced reactions and then gets accelerated by reactions from the anode. Besides, the solvent vaporization is verified to dominate pressure building up during thermal runaway. Moreover, Li-S batteries employing varied electrolytes with different thermal stabilities, even inorganic all solid-state electrolytes, all undergo rapid thermal runaway at a narrow temperature range due to the intrinsic thermal features of the sulfur cathode and Li metal anode sublimating, melting, and cross-reacting at high temperatures. The in-depth depicted thermal runaway routes will deliver great inspiration for mitigating the safety issues of next generation batteries.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries10.1021/cm901452z ↗
2. Design principles of artificial solid electrolyte interphases for lithium-metal anodes10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100119 ↗
3. Alternative energy technologies10.1038/35104599 ↗
4. Metallic anodes for next generation secondary batteries10.1039/c3cs60177c ↗
5. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
6. Lithium–sulfur batteries: progress and prospects10.1002/adma.201405115 ↗
7. Review on Li-sulfur battery systems: an integral perspective10.1002/aenm.201500212 ↗
8. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries10.1021/cr500062v ↗
9. Nanostructured sulfur cathodes10.1039/c2cs35256g ↗
10. Lithium-sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects10.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
11. Challenges and prospects of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/ar300179v ↗
12. ZnO hard templating for synthesis of hierarchical porous carbons with tailored porosity and high performance in lithium-sulfur battery10.1002/adfm.201402768 ↗
13. Revealing the multilevel thermal safety of lithium batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.004 ↗
14. Uncovering LiH triggered thermal runaway mechanism of a high-energy LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2/graphite pouch cell10.1002/advs.202100676 ↗
15. Mitigating thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.010 ↗
16. Thermal runaway features of lithium sulfur pouch cells at various states of charge evaluated by extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229503 ↗
17. Comprehensive evaluation of safety performance and failure mechanism analysis for lithium sulfur pouch cells10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.035 ↗
18. Leakage-proof electrolyte chemistry for high-performance lithium–sulfur battery10.1002/anie.202103209 ↗
19. Electrolyte decomposition and gas evolution in a lithium-sulfur cell upon long-term cycling10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.034 ↗
20. The critical role of lithium nitrate in the gas evolution of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C6EE00789A ↗
21. Lithium metal batteries capable of stable operation at elevated temperature10.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.005 ↗
22. The thermal stability of lithium solid electrolytes with metallic lithium10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.012 ↗
23. 4.2 V poly(ethylene oxide)-based all-solid-state lithium batteries with superior cycle and safety performance10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.026 ↗
24. Halogen-free flame-retardant sulfur copolymers with stable Li–S battery performance10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.041 ↗
25. Rechargeable lithium sulfur battery10.1149/1.1571532 ↗
26. Polysulfide shuttle study in the Li/S battery system10.1149/1.1806394 ↗
27. Lithium/sulfur cell discharge mechanism: an original approach for intermediate species identification10.1021/ac2032244 ↗
28. Progress towards commercially viable Li–S battery cells10.1002/aenm.201500118 ↗
29. Approaching practically accessible solid-state batteries: stability issues related to solid electrolytes and interfaces10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268 ↗
30. Radical or not radical: revisiting lithium–sulfur electrochemistry in nonaqueous electrolytes10.1002/aenm.201401801 ↗
31. Insights into Li-S battery cathode capacity fading mechanisms: irreversible oxidation of active mass during cycling10.1149/2.020211jes ↗
32. Intrinsic shuttle suppression in lithium-sulfur batteries for pouch cell application10.1149/2.0981714jes ↗
33. Towards stable lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanistic insights into electrolyte decomposition on lithium metal anode10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.003 ↗
34. Radical decomposition of ether-based electrolytes for Li-S batteries10.1149/2.0311709jes ↗
35. Density functional study of the conformations and vibrations of 1,2-dimethoxyethane10.1021/jp9800766 ↗
36. Ab initio study of the pseudorotation in 1,3-dioxolane10.1016/S0022-2860(01)00830-4 ↗
37. Insight on lithium metal anode interphasial chemistry: reduction mechanism of cyclic ether solvent and SEI film formation10.1016/j.ensm.2018.09.024 ↗
38. Insight on lithium metal anode interphasial chemistry: Reduction mechanism of cyclic ether solvent and SEI film formation10.1016/j.ensm.2018.09.024 ↗
39. The progress of Li–S batteries—understanding of the sulfur redox mechanism: dissolved polysulfide ions in the electrolytes10.1002/admt.201700233 ↗
40. Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.102 ↗
41. Recent progress and emerging application areas for lithium–sulfur battery technology10.1002/ente.202000694 ↗
42. Tuning the electrolyte network structure to invoke quasi-solid state sulfur conversion and suppress lithium dendrite formation in Li–S batteries10.1038/s41560-018-0214-0 ↗
43. Interfacial reactivity and interphase growth of argyrodite solid electrolytes at lithium metal electrodes10.1016/j.ssi.2017.07.005 ↗
44. Critical stripping current leads to dendrite formation on plating in lithium anode solid electrolyte cells10.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
45. The synergetic effect of lithium polysulfide and lithium nitrate to prevent lithium dendrite growth10.1038/ncomms8436 ↗
46. Analysis of the solid electrolyte interphase formed with an ionic liquid electrolyte for lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.119 ↗