The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation
Source abstract
Abstract
Summary We investigate the role of firm low-carbon resources in decarbonizing power generation in combination with variable renewable resources, battery energy storage, demand flexibility, and long-distance transmission. We evaluate nearly 1,000 cases covering varying CO2 limits, technological uncertainties, and geographic differences in demand and renewable resource potential. Availability of firm low-carbon technologies, including nuclear, natural gas with carbon capture and sequestration, and bioenergy, reduces electricity costs by 10%–62% across fully decarbonized cases. Below 50 gCO2/kWh, these resources lower costs in the vast majority of cases. Additionally, as emissions limits decrease, installed capacity of several resources changes non-monotonically. This underscores the need to evaluate near-term policy and investment decisions based on contributions to long-term decarbonization rather than interim goals. Installed capacity for all resources is also strongly affected by uncertain technology parameters. This emphasizes the importance of a broad research portfolio and flexible policy support that expands rather than constrains future options.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris Agreement - Status of Ratification. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/status-of-ratification. (Accessed: 2nd May 2018).
3. IPCC · 2014
4. Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 ↗
5. The challenge to keep global warming below 2°C10.1038/nclimate1783 ↗
6. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C10.1038/nclimate2572 ↗
7. Biomass enables the transition to a carbon-negative power system across western North America10.1038/nclimate2488 ↗
8. A commercialization strategy for carbon-negative energy10.1038/nenergy.2015.2 ↗
9. GEA · 2012
10. Transport electrification: a key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization10.1007/s10584-013-0969-z ↗
11. Iyer, G., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Kyle, P., Ledna, C., McJeon, H., and Wise, M. (2017). GCAM-USA analysis of U.S. electric power sector transitions. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-26174.pdf.
12. Keppler, J.H., and Cometto, M. (2012). Nuclear energy and renewables: system effects in low-carbon electricity systems. NEA no. 7056. Available at: https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2012/7056-system-effects.pdf.
13. Lokhov · 2011
14. Profitability evaluation of load-following nuclear units with physics-induced operational constraints10.1080/00295450.2017.1388668 ↗
15. The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.002 ↗
16. The economic merits of flexible carbon capture and sequestration as a compliance strategy with the clean power plan10.1021/acs.est.6b03652 ↗
17. Quantifying the value of CCS for the future electricity system10.1039/C6EE01120A ↗
18. Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.067 ↗
19. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100 % penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes10.1073/pnas.1510028112 ↗
20. Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.079 ↗
21. Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057 ↗
22. Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems - a review of research results and methodologies10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.199 ↗
23. Power system balancing for deep decarbonization of the electricity sector10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.180 ↗
24. Reduced storage and balancing needs in a fully renewable European power system with excess wind and solar power generation10.1016/j.renene.2011.02.009 ↗
25. Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.012 ↗
26. Economic and technical challenges of flexible operations under large-scale variable renewable deployment10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.012 ↗
27. Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions10.1038/nclimate2921 ↗
28. Backup flexibility classes in emerging large-scale renewable electricity systems10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.020 ↗
29. Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.019 ↗
30. Storage as a flexibility option in power systems with high shares of variable renewable energy sources: a POLES-based analysis10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.006 ↗
31. Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.029 ↗
32. Real-world challenges with a rapid transition to 100% renewable power systems10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.002 ↗
33. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States
34. How much bulk energy storage is needed to decarbonize electricity?10.1039/C5EE01452B ↗
35. The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.014 ↗
36. A systems approach to quantifying the value of power generation and energy storage technologies in future electricity networks10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.012 ↗
37. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris agreement10.1038/nclimate3202 ↗
38. Jenkins, J.D., and Sepulveda, N.A. (2017). Enhanced decision support for a changing electricity landscape: the GenX configurable electricity resource capacity expansion model. MITEI-WP-2017-10. Available at: http://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Enhanced-Decision-Support-for-a-Changing-Electricity-Landscape.pdf.
39. Impact of operational flexibility on electricity generation planning with renewable and carbon targets10.1109/TSTE.2015.2498640 ↗
40. System integration of wind and solar power in integrated assessment models: a cross-model evaluation of new approaches10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.018 ↗
41. Applicability of a clustered unit commitment model in power system modeling10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2736441 ↗
42. Poncelet, K. (2018). Long-term energy-system optimization models: capturing the challenges of integrating intermittent renewable energy sources and assessing the suitability for descriptive scenario analyses. PhD thesis (KU Leuven). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21586.45762.
43. NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). (2017). 2017 Annual Technology Baseline. Available at: https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2017/.
44. Lazard. (2017). Lazard’s levelized cost of storage analysis — version 3.0. Available at: https://www.lazard.com/media/450338/lazard-levelized-cost-of-storage-version-30.pdf.
45. Georgia Public Service Commission · 2016
46. IEA · 2015
47. US Energy Information Administration. (2018). Carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption: electric power sector. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/sec12_9.pdf.
48. US Energy Information Administration. (2018). Electricity data browser: net generation by energy source: electric utilities. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/.
49. The optimal share of variable renewables the optimal share of variable renewables10.5547/01956574.36.1.6 ↗
50. Mills, A., and Wiser, R. (2012). Changes in the economic value of variable generation at high penetration levels: a pilot case study of California. LBNL-5445E. Available at: http://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-5445e.pdf.10.2172/1183176 ↗