journal article·2025-07

Pathways to national-scale adoption of enhanced geothermal power through experience-driven cost reductions

Wilson Ricks, Jesse D. Jenkins

Joule· Volume 9· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

This is a working paper, and is currently undergoing peer review. All code and inputs/results data relevant to the analysis is available for download from a separate repository. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are one of a small number of emerging energy technologies with the potential to deliver firm carbon-free electricity at large scale, but are often excluded from macro-scale decarbonization studies due to uncertainties regarding their cost and resource potential. Here we combine empirically-grounded near-term EGS cost estimates with an experience curves framework, by which costs fall as a function of cumulative deployment, to model EGS deployment pathways and impacts on the United States electricity sector from the present day through 2050. We find that by initially exploiting limited high-quality geothermal resources in the Western US, EGS could achieve early commercialization and experience-based cost reductions that enable it to supply up to a fifth of total US electricity generation by 2050 and substantially reduce the cost of decarbonization nationwide. Higher-than-expected initial EGS costs could inhibit early growth and constrain the technology’s long-run potential, though supportive policies can counteract these effects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications · Global Energy and Sustainability Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. Larson · 2020
2. Carbon-Neutral Pathways for the United States10.1029/2020AV000284 ↗
3. Denholm · 2022
4. The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006 ↗
5. What is different about different net-zero carbon electricity systems?
6. Quantifying the challenge of reaching a 100% renewable energy power system for the United States10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.011 ↗
7. Commercial-Scale Demonstration of a First-of-a-Kind Enhanced Geothermal System
8. Utah FORGE. (2024). Utah FORGE Successfully Completes Stimulation and Circulation Tests – Establishing Effective Communication. https://utahforge.com/2024/05/23/press-release-stimcirc-tests/.
9. From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115769 ↗
10. A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0 ↗
11. Technology perspectives from 1950 to 2100 and policy implications for the global nuclear power industry10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.009 ↗
12. Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127776 ↗
13. 2024
14. The battle for biomass: A systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition
15. High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower potential10.1038/s41560-017-0006-y ↗
16. Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century10.1073/pnas.1809426115 ↗
17. The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems10.1038/s41560-021-00796-8 ↗
18. 2019
19. Geothermal power generation potential in the united states by 2050
20. Augustine · 2023
21. The role of flexible geothermal power in decarbonized electricity systems10.1038/s41560-023-01437-y ↗
22. Review Of Drilling Performance In A Horizontal EGS Development
23. Penrod, E. (2024). NV Energy seeks new tariff to supply Google with 24/7 power from Fervo geothermal plant. Utility Dive. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/google-fervo-nv-energy-nevada-puc-clean-energy-tariff/719472/.
24. Fervo Energy. (2024). World’s largest geothermal PPAs highlight increasing utility demand for clean, reliable next-generation geothermal energy. https://fervoenergy.com/fervo-energy-announces-320-mw-power-purchase-agreements-with-southern-california-edison/.
25. Temperature-At-Depth Maps for the Conterminous U. S. and Geothermal Resource Estimates
26. Mind the gap: Comparing the net value of geothermal, wind, solar, and solar+storage in the western united states10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.023 ↗
27. Blankenship · 2024
28. 2024
29. Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes10.2514/8.155 ↗
30. Learning rates for energy technologies10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00122-1 ↗
31. A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.011 ↗
32. Accelerating Low-Carbon Innovation10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.004 ↗
33. 2020
34. GE Vernova. (2023). GE Hitachi Signs Contract for the First North American Small Modular Reactor. https://www.gevernova.com/news/press-releases/ge-hitachi-signs-contract-for-the-first-north-american-small-modular-reactor.
35. NET Power. (2022). NET Power Announces its First Utility-Scale Clean Energy Power Plant Integrated with CO2 Sequestration. https://netpower.com/press-releases/net-power-announces-its-first-utility-scale-clean-energy-power-plant-integrated-with-co2-sequestration/.
36. Experience curve for natural gas production by hydraulic fracturing10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.027 ↗
37. Market Report on Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems: Recent Developments and Outlook
38. 2023
39. The value of in-reservoir energy storage for flexible dispatch of geothermal power10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118807 ↗
40. System-level impacts of voluntary carbon-free electricity procurement strategies10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.007 ↗
41. Thermal Earth model for the conterminous United States using an interpolative physics-informed graph neural network10.1186/s40517-024-00304-7 ↗
42. Projecting the competition between energy-storage technologies in the electricity sector10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.017 ↗
43. Roser · 2020
44. 2016
45. 2022
46. Global Value Chain and Manufacturing Analysis on Geothermal Power Plant Turbines
47. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2024). Producer Price Index by Industry: Drilling Oil and Gas Wells. https://alfred.stlouisfed.org/series?seid=PCU213111213111.
48. Brown · 2012
49. Mines · 2016
50. Ricks · 2024
51. 2024
52. Impacts of weather-driven output variability on the value of geothermal electricity
53. Young · 2019
54. Thermal Characteristics of the FORGE site, Milford, Utah
55. Williams · 2008
56. 2015
57. Land use trade-offs in decarbonization of electricity generation in the american west
58. Bonaldo · 2023
59. Jenkins, J., and Sepulveda, N. (2017). Enhanced Decision Support for a Changing Electricity Landscape: The GenX Configurable Electricity Resource Capacity Expansion Model. Working Paper MIT Energy Initiative. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Enhanced-Decision-Support-for-a-Changing-Electricity-Landscape.pdf.
60. Schivley · 2024
61. Jenkins · 2024
62. 2024
63. How predictable is technological progress?10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001 ↗
64. Preliminary cost and performance results for a natural gas-fired direct sco2 power plant
65. Use of the experience curve to understand economics for at-scale egs projects
66. Statistical basis for predicting technological progress10.1371/journal.pone.0052669 ↗
67. Technology s-curves in renewable energy alternatives: Analysis and implications for industry and government10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.004 ↗
68. Robins · 2021
69. 2024
70. Evaluating the role of unit size in learning-by-doing of energy technologies10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.010 ↗
71. Wind turbine technology trends10.3390/app12178653 ↗
72. 2022
73. 2023
74. 2023
75. Utilizing supercritical geothermal systems: a review of past ventures and ongoing research activities10.1186/s40517-017-0075-y ↗
76. Hill · 2023